wdtz

Members
  • Content Count

    46
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by wdtz

  1. >I'm willing to try any builds, configs, and pretty much anything else anyone can think of, short of soldering,

    Do some dtb hacking? All the memory timing is in this, maybe the mem is pushed too far, too hard?

    But, it is plenty complicated, looking at 5x, much of the detail is gone, so applies to 4x mostly

  2. OK, a bit more update, I did try a nightly, mostly works OK

    one boot(early) needed a vt, black screen and

    oddly, caps,num were not active so I didn't think it had booted, well, give it a try,, whoa!! whats this!

    One did a hard lock, the first IIRR

    Since it has been booting without problem

    (This is using its own uboot)

    Sleep, so far is only s2idle, deep fails to wake

    Despite ACPI and a change to legacy uboot, have not gotten S3 sleep

    S3 on manjaro, elementary, fedora,, sleep is 7%/d, fast  too,,

    so makes running off SD feasible (if you're not a reboot addict)

    Any suggestions for S3?

    Anything besides sleep.conf?

  3. @TDCroPower

    I have to wonder if you have a uboot (&equally important, idbloader) on your emmc

    If you run fdisk on emmc is there room,,1st part start at 32768 (or >)?

    What the boot rom is looking for is idblaoder, well, a raw read for the signature bytes

    3B 8C DC FC  BE 9F 9D 51  (so far, all idbloaders are same here)

    I guess it is assumed that if idbloader is there (on that media), then so will uboot

    So, something like..... dd if=/dev/emmc of=test skip=64 count=1

    then,,,,, hexedit test

  4. https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=10694&page=6 ,, post 58 & on

    Oddly I had a great deal of trouble getting anything but black screen, probably booted 'cause capslock toggle worked (leds)

    The bsp uboots gave 'hard locks' (mrfix, pcm), now using samueldr, 1 in 5 boots

    My pbp is a bit unusual, emmc uboot area blanked, so forced to use SD uboot

    If sleep to mem works, doesn't matter if SD is slow, resume to desktop is 10-12 s, another 10 for wifi

    But I have not found how to resume armbian, so no idea how well it does

  5. Well, if you have serial terminal....

    >the device loads first the uboot from the emmc

    I doubt that there is one (on the emmc)

    So then it looks at SD, loads 1st idbloader, then uboot, then ATF (arm trusted firmware),,

    all from uSD

    I would say that either your emmc/controller are bad or dtb is not right

    copy boot.* as backup, try other dtbs,, since it is a H96+ also write image to a usb stick,,

    many dtb have a wrong regulator setting for SD power, uboot is OK, then SD is dead with kernel

    usb stick will still work, see if fdisk works with different dtb (writes without error, a rerun shows correct data)

     

    --theoretical--If idbloader from emmc and then uboot (emmc), and there is a bootable SD card,

    what comes next??.. Clearly the version of uboot must prioritize SD or only android would boot

    I know, for rk3299 order baked into chip is spi, emmc, SD, usb for program load

    I don't remember for rk3328

    --edit--

    only 2 dtb are right for H96max+ easyb and ?hexdump?

    All others have no power to SD after uboot

    uboot can read SD OK, load dtb, then load kernel, then card is dead

    So, only change SD card, easiest is to copy good dtb to *.gd

    then copy, in turn, dtb to name of dtb you are using, make a note of which,

    or do in alphabetical order, don't bother with anything with android in the name

     

  6. >Buffer I/O error on dev mmcblk1, logical block 0, lost async page write

    >/dev/mmcblk1: close device failed: Input/output error

    I think something is wrong with hardware, perhaps try a different (but compatible) dtb

    OR try   dd if=/dev/zero of=emmc bs=1M count=20 (change emmc as appropriate)

    Do be sure to run fdisk again, command p ,, q,, just to see if error msg was correct

     

    And, PLEASE start first partition at 32768 sectors (16M).

    Most distros expect unpartitioned space for idbloader(start 64 sec), uboot (8M, 32384)

    and ATF (not sure). sometimes you see them as mmcblkXboot0, boot1, rpmb in dmesg,,

    (uboot in boot0, ATF in rpmb,, idbloader just raw)

    NOT accessible with fdisk at all,, will NOT show up,

    if it wasn't for     dmesg | grep mmcblk       you wouldn't know they exist

    And some distros have different offsets, but if you leave 16M blank it usually works out

  7. Why would you not use fdisk on the emmc to define and format partitions?

    Do start at 16M, 32768 sectors for the first, 2-300M,, fat, type c

    and the rest linux, type 83,, mkdosfs -F32 /dev/mmcblk1p1,, mkfs.ext4   .......p2

    All as root  (16M = 16*1024*2 sectors,,, space for idbloader, uboot, tfm)

    If the emmc is bad, you will get lots of errors

  8. OK, i'll make an attempt, please correct me where wrong

    dtc is kind of stupid, and device trees could definitely be improved

    I'll bet you don't have a compiler environment and that's the problem

    an example line, still symbolic,,, gpios = <&gpio2 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;

    The <&something,,> is an internal (only?) pointer in the dtb

    The next 2 elements are probably populated from an appropriate .h (header) file

    (specific to that hardware)

    So it becomes,,,  gpios = < 0x3e 0x02 0x01 >;  ( a random example)

    The dtc compiler can only deal with numbers

    There is also an include at the top, has to be merged in

     

    It would be a REAL improvement if the pointers, wherever possible

    had the same numbers as linux devices they represent

    (Probably that would be half, to differentiate the "made up"

    ones, add F0 00 00 00, so f0000001,f0000002, ...

    There could be a standard..... a device tree number standard)

     

    The &numbers seem to be somewhat random, 1st come I think

    All source dts are not written is same order and have different numbers of stanza's

    so, in 6 dts's for example for 3328, only 2 will almost match (&numbers)

    most confusing, pages of notes, a real pain

  9. understand, uboot and kernel have different dtb,  that is why h96max+ starts, with uboot as seen

    by serial cable, but then when hands over to kernel dtb does not power uSD slot, something non-standard

    with regulators. So, it can't find its root filesystem, because slot is dead, no power

    You see no hdmi display until quite late in the boot, so it seems dead, just can't read uSD slot

    It there is a usb stick ALSO plugged in, will find root fs on usb stick..  uSD slot continues dead, unpowered

    easyb and hexdump  have made dtb for h96max+/T9 that make regulators work.

    I don't know about other models

    ----edit----

    For my h96max+ there is a problem with usb2 port, in dmesg late in boot and periodically

    (with hexdumps' dtb, not with easyb's)

    genirq: Flags mismatch irq 13. 00000080 (serial) vs. 00004000 (debug)

    Quickly, the usb2 port 'locks up' there is no easy way to revive,,

    I am sure a suitable  unbind,bind would make it work for a bit, a bit esoteric

    But now, I am using easyb's dtb, a 5hr power out forced a shutdown (47d uptime)

    No problem with usb2 port

  10. I hope you don't expect me to do it for you?

    I am going to assume that you have broken that image up into the partition images

    I don't know if you are using win or linux, no matter

    There are hexeditors for both, a gui vesion is my recommendation,

    wxHex or okteta or ghex,  I tend to use okteta

    load kernel.img into hexeditor, control f , make sure the hex button is selected,

    enter the signature above.  It will be a good sign if it is found at the begining of the line,

    make a note of the address, keep searching. Then, in calculator, set decimal , address/1024, should be even, no remainder

    If so,, try        dd if=kernel.img of=test bs=1024 skip=(above number) count=70     (Input file, output file, block size)

    Check test, load into hexeditor, should begin with signature, if not, you screwed up

    Then try to decompile, as usual

    If you don't find it appended to kernel, search in other images

  11. Are you saying that there is no resource.img? You do know that the dtb is 2K into resource.img (IIRR)? use dd to strip

    Sometimes the dtb is appended to the kernel,,, anyway search, with a hexeditor for D0 0D FE ED 00, at an even K boundry

    d00dfeed00 it the "signature" for dtb's.  Most dtbs are about 60-65K in size

    Most of the resource.img is an (graphic) image file (or 2) for the splash screen

    I haven't found android dtbs to be very  useful

    And, BTW how well does easyb's dtb work for you,, does everything work, both usb, ethernet?

    I have 46d uptime, I seldom reboot

  12. Digit:  with a working and non-working situation,, compare

     

    lsusb ,,, lsusb | wc -l  ,,,    dmesg | tail -15 (just after dongle inserted,, ie unplug, replug)

    as root/sudo,,,   lsmod | grep ath  ,,, ifconfig

     

    If it doesn't show with lsusb, check the other port,

    for me, hexdump's dtb conflicts usb2 and debug, doesn't work,,

    and usb3 locks hub on a daily basis, needs a replug, 3 different hubs

    Haven't tried easyb's dtb yet

  13. >I have tried the conversion from dts to dtb but i not have success. 

    Try again,,,  dtc -h,, must be dtb,,, dts is only for editing/altering,,, kernel wants dtb

    Let us know how it goes

    Because of the symbolic names, if you don't have a compile environment it

    probably won't work

  14. I guess you have not read much of this thread, last5-6 pages would be good

    t9.dtb for 4.4.x kernel seems OK, I have not tried any 5.x, slightly different dtb (guess)

    Not on ups, 10d uptime,, H96max+, wifi dongle a bit unstable, needs powered hub, x11vnc

    Oh, and if hub back-feeds (many do) must unplug for reboot or power off

    For example, a 2 second power "blink", you will think box is dead, until you unplug hub power too

  15. @hexdump

    Thanks for your t9.dtb,, works fine with H96 max+ for me

    I could never figure out how the regulators worked, somehow you did

    Only thing lacking is module for SSV6051

    I guess I should try to put patch in right place and make a kernel

  16. On 2/15/2019 at 7:49 PM, rmoriz said:

     

    They are not the same, as my 64GB version has another radio chipset. There are at least two hardware versions out there, and there are different android firmware releases. One is "SSV6051_RTL8189" the other one is "HS2734".

    Board is labeled RK3328_8D4_V1.1, same as yours, wifi chip is indeed different, SV6051P

    Serial connection as shown in your photo

    I think the problem with sd card is power to socket,

    if you read this thread I have a few posts previous

  17. 17 hours ago, rmoriz said:

    1. PCB is labelled as "RK3328_8D4_V1.1" with date "20180703"

    2 .Wifi/BT chip seems to be:

    I have H96 max+,32gb, board is same, wifi is sv6051, no bluetooth

    Like you, most of the dtb give root fs not found, no /dev/block/mmc....  ,, or

    for the android versions a black screen, serial shows only a few lines of kernel load (<5)

    --edit--

    you can make it work by writing image to both a uSD card and a usb stick,

    it will probably find the stick and run from it. The uSd can be small and slow

    Not so good with only 2 usb sockets

  18. 17 hours ago, CarlosPiles said:

    Be carefull with changing /system/xbin/su as i've read sometimes it blocks Android boot.

    Can you quote some specific models?

    My H96max+, android8.1 seemed OK,,  SuperSU installed OK, root checker said all was well

  19. 47 minutes ago, mb16 said:

    but in my case, running literary "adb root" did work for me.

    Err,, adb is not "android",, android is the graphical shell,,

    hypothetical example,, if you had firefox installed,, typing firefox in adb would NOT startup firefox

    But, for sure , adb is very powerful, despite being a considerable pain

    More on point, adb uses the su in /sbin,, android uses the su in /system/xbin,, it is no good

  20. 4 hours ago, mb16 said:

    adb root worked out of the box, devices like this one seem to be rooted by default?

    Clearly,, you have not read whole thread,, about 5 pages back, but differently

    in adb# ,, ls -l /sbin/su;  ls -l /system/xbin/su   ,, notice that they are not the same?

    (google) verity off; mount -o remount,rw /system;  cd /system/xbin; mv su su.bak;  cp /sbin/su .

    and then root will work in android

    FWIW

  21. 4 hours ago, nathanwz said:

    can anyone give me a hint what the problem might be

    I have one of these, in the simple shell ls -l /dev/block will show at best mmcblk1 (the emmc),

    (almost) never the sd card

    I think it's something to do with the regulator,,  pwm does not seem to work,,

    the android dtb seem to use simpleReg vrs rk805-regulator

    I did a "hack" bypassing gpio, barely works, lots of errors in dmesg

    (regulator errors,, boots and runs from sd)

    The other method is to copy rootfs to a usb stick, rename the partitions (e2label)