LosiInSwiss 0 Posted May 19, 2020 Share Posted May 19, 2020 Hi all I have been using https://github.com/billw2/rpi-clone to clone sd cards as it uses rsync. It's much quicker than imaging and will clone larger cards to smaller if there is space. The thing is it expects a raspberrypi and so doesn't update the UUID in the armbianEnv.txt and fstab. If I manually do this then the clone is bookable and works fine. I cant script (yet), so if anyone could take a look at the script on git and suggest how this could be changed to work with armbian also i would be really grateful. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Igor 2448 Posted May 19, 2020 Share Posted May 19, 2020 (edited) On 5/19/2020 at 7:59 AM, LosiInSwiss said: I cant script (yet) This is a great opportunity to learn about and to learn about how to contribute. Edited March 31 by TRS-80 typo 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthijs Kooijman 6 Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 I needed rpi-clone support for Armbian as well, so I implemented at least basic support at https://github.com/billw2/rpi-clone/pull/140 Testing welcome (probably best to just download the script from the pullrequest, since there has not been significant activity in that repo, so I do not expect the PR to be merged anytime soon...) 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRS-80 184 Posted March 31 Share Posted March 31 On 3/16/2022 at 2:49 PM, Matthijs Kooijman said: probably best to just download the script from the pullrequest, since there has not been significant activity in that repo, so I do not expect the PR to be merged anytime soon... If original guy has lost interest, maybe you guys would like to collaborate on an active fork. Assuming this is something you will be maintaining anyway for your own usage. This is the beauty (and opportunity) of F/LOSS. We have options in such cases. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthijs Kooijman 6 Posted Saturday at 08:21 AM Share Posted Saturday at 08:21 AM On 4/1/2022 at 12:47 AM, TRS-80 said: If original guy has lost interest, maybe you guys would like to collaborate on an active fork. Assuming this is something you will be maintaining anyway for your own usage. I won't have time for that, too many other projects already... (including some other projects I rescued like this :-p). I will be maintaining my own fork a bit, but only for my particular and very specific usecase, so going beyond that and properly maintaining the project (including development and/or accepting contributions) is going to take up a lot more time... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.