darkdrgn2k Posted April 21, 2018 Share Posted April 21, 2018 The wireless interfaces are not coming up [ 16.959456] cfg80211: Loading compiled-in X.509 certificates for regulatory database [ 16.969238] cfg80211: Loaded X.509 cert 'sforshee: 00b28ddf47aef9cea7' [ 16.971635] platform regulatory.0: Direct firmware load for regulatory.db failed with error -2 [ 16.971650] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 41.751941] rk_gmac-dwmac ff540000.ethernet eth0: Link is Up - 100Mbps/Full - flow control off [ 41.751976] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkdrgn2k Posted April 21, 2018 Author Share Posted April 21, 2018 seems im missing allot of wireless drivers including rt2800usb and ath9k_htc root@aaaa:/lib/modules/4.16.0-rc6-rk3328/kernel/drivers/net/wireless# find . . ./ti ./ti/wlcore ./ti/wlcore/wlcore.ko ./ti/wlcore/wlcore_sdio.ko ./ti/wl18xx ./ti/wl18xx/wl18xx.ko ./rtl8814au ./rtl8814au/8814au.ko ./broadcom ./broadcom/brcm80211 ./broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac ./broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/brcmfmac.ko ./broadcom/brcm80211/brcmutil ./broadcom/brcm80211/brcmutil/brcmutil.ko ./rtl8812au ./rtl8812au/8812au.ko Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkdrgn2k Posted August 31, 2018 Author Share Posted August 31, 2018 *BUMP* anyone know anyway of fixing this less re-compiling the kernel? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Igor Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 6 hours ago, darkdrgn2k said: *BUMP* anyone know anyway of fixing this less re-compiling the kernel? A modern kernel is in development. We don't support it but you are welcome to send a PR with changes and it will be included. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
berturion Posted September 11, 2018 Share Posted September 11, 2018 Hello Igor, when you say "a modern kernel", you mean a kernel near the version of the mainline one ? Is there a corresponding git repo to see the progress of it ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Igor Posted September 11, 2018 Share Posted September 11, 2018 34 minutes ago, berturion said: Hello Igor, when you say "a modern kernel", you mean a kernel near the version of the mainline one ? Is there a corresponding git repo to see the progress of it ? We usually work with/have two kernels. Stock legacy, currently mostly 4.4.y. and mainline, usually latest LTS or stable, 4.14.y/4.18.y at the time. Legacy is labeled "default", while modern "next" ... or "dev" when attached to the master kernel branch. Repositories per kernel family are defined here: https://github.com/armbian/build/tree/master/config/sources ... for this particular board family we use the repository from Ayufan which seems to be in the best shape. Another alternative would be kernel.org + a bunch of patches. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
berturion Posted September 11, 2018 Share Posted September 11, 2018 11 hours ago, Igor said: We usually work with/have two kernels. Stock legacy, currently mostly 4.4.y. and mainline, usually latest LTS or stable, 4.14.y/4.18.y at the time. Legacy is labeled "default", while modern "next" ... or "dev" when attached to the master kernel branch. Repositories per kernel family are defined here: https://github.com/armbian/build/tree/master/config/sources ... for this particular board family we use the repository from Ayufan which seems to be in the best shape. Another alternative would be kernel.org + a bunch of patches. Ok thanks. For now I am on Arch Arm with the mainline kernel. But I am not very satisfied with its stability. My system hangs randomly. I suspect a bad support of the USB stuff. I am thinking of migrating to Armbian, I really liked it on my old Cubieboard2. My rootfs is on a partition of a self powered external disk connected to the USB 3.0 port. I also have another external disk in a 2.0 port (powered by the host) that is mounted when executing cron backup tasks. Do you think Armbian with aayfan kernel is a more stable ? What is the probability for the mainline kernel to have a good support for this board ? (Sorry to be a little out of the subject of this thread) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maruprez Posted October 1, 2018 Share Posted October 1, 2018 (edited) I'm Sorry... It has been a mistake!!! Edited October 3, 2018 by maruprez Mistake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts