Jump to content

Afritic Group

Members
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. @Igor: Is there really a chance that Kernel 6.12.x would address PCIe different than 6.1.x? Aren't those addresses in hardware?
  2. @eselarm: Thank you for your feedback! So to double check: The labels on the hardware and with e.g. ifconfig are correctly matching for R6C?
  3. Current Kernel is Linux 6.1.75-vendor-rk35xx #1 SMP Tue Nov 12 08:48:32 UTC 2024 aarch64 GNU/Linux
  4. Unfortunately, there seems not yet to be an area in this forum for NanoPi R6C/S, so here we go ... Here is the default Armbian /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", KERNELS=="fe1c0000.ethernet", NAME:="wan" SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="r8169", KERNELS=="0003:31:00.0", NAME:="lan1" SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="r8169", KERNELS=="0004:41:00.0", NAME:="lan2" This does not match up with the labels on the case! Here is the correct config we have updated and tested on a NanoPi R6S at Afritic Group: SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", KERNELS=="fe1c0000.ethernet", NAME:="lan2" SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="r8169", KERNELS=="0003:31:00.0", NAME:="wan" SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="r8169", KERNELS=="0004:41:00.0", NAME:="lan1" So now with this updated config, the internal and external names match up!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Guidelines