Cancer

HP Pavilion8 core processor, 32Gig RAM laptop. I wanted to limit information to limit time for digging into it, but here they are: log-build-322ed1c8-a4db-4873-85ac-be8e6a87fbd6.log.ans summary-build-322ed1c8-a4db-4873-85ac-be8e6a87fbd6.md

Hi All I've made for my sbc image, however found during this process messages including 1 marked as error : ``` Error response from registry: failed to fetch the content of "ghcr.io/armbian/os/armbian-bsp-cli-bananapipro-current:1-PCc91e-V4b00-H9299-B1e5d-Rf36a": ghcr.io/armbian/os/armbian-bsp-cli-bananapipro-current:1-PCc91e-V4b00-H9299-B1e5d-Rf36a: not found ``` some repeatible during the process: ``` gpg: WARNING: unsafe ownership on homedir '/home/bask/.gnupg' /usr/bin/deb-systemd-helper was not called from dpkg. Exiting. /usr/bin/deb-systemd-helper was not called from dpkg. Exiting. invoke-rc.d: unknown initscript, /etc/init.d/iperf3 not found. ``` and finally filtered from log: ``` filtered from log @output/logs/log-build-322ed1c8-a4db-4873-85ac-be8e6a87fbd6.log.ans Error 3 occurred in main shell /home/bask/Dokumenty/build/lib/functions/configuration/menu.sh:38 dialog_if_terminal_set_vars() --> lib/functions/configuration/menu.sh:38 interactive_config_ask_board_list() --> lib/functions/configuration/interactive.sh:149 config_possibly_interactive_kernel_board() --> lib/functions/main/config-interactive.sh:16 prep_conf_main_build_single() --> lib/functions/main/config-prepare.sh:21 cli_standard_build_run() --> lib/functions/cli/cli-build.sh:22 armbian_cli_run_command() --> lib/functions/cli/utils-cli.sh:136 cli_entrypoint() --> lib/functions/cli/entrypoint.sh:176 main() --> compile.sh:50 ``` Not sure if I should worry or it is handled somehow? I'll try an expert mode as there was not too much to configure and verify Second thing: 90 mins for this process is normal? I was doing it on newly installed Ubuntu (directly on the disk in dual mode so whole HW available for it)

@ag123 I was writing about configuration from minimal armbian image for bananapi pro, you're writing something about gnome interface... your default it's in minimal armbian image default in the file /etc/netplan/armbian-default.yaml (different name for some reason known to Igor) and this file should be set to 600 as required by netplan while it isn't in the image. As I wrote before Network manager is masked where have you taken this idea from? It's running so why do you want to install nmtui is best of all. Hmm maybe also old and bad from someone's perspective Anyway , question is if network manager should be unmasked (what then?), or default netplan config changed to some dhcp settings for netplan to directly get info about network. How can i be sure that config will work after reboot?

I don't like brainless matrix. Not using ifconfig however newer doesn't always mean better especially when it's not fool proof configured. Nevermind. When in new basic images we have 3 programs/processes instead of one for network and system after reboot doesn't come to back without checking configuration something is wrong. if one is new to new config must find what manages the network. Question is who are images for? Not for newbies for sure. Correct me if I'm wrong in any point: I can see in docs on main pages that netplan.io controls configuration. Really? Network manager does it however is masked and netplan is redirected to network manager config from what I've seen. When somebody doesn't know newer stuff must investigate/ask/look for solution or having at least admin knowledge in this matter. docs say that at first boot I should see: ``` Internet connection was not detected. Connect via wireless? [Y/n] y Multiple wireless adaptors detected. (...) ``` Never have seen such thing at all in armbian Docs should show defaults properly and if one needs more the rest in deeper details. However it doesn't look

still on windows , but microsoft suggests 11 so looking for linux 11

" Either of those," i'm one step closer OK, i 'll get Ubunto on vm and will look deeper. Thanks for now

Not joking at all. 1st point Supported Architectures: x86_64, aarch64, riscv64 board is armhf Next 3 points from this readme: System: VM, container, or bare-metal with: ≥ 8GB RAM (less with KERNEL_BTF=no) ~50GB disk space Operating System: Armbian / Ubuntu 24.04 (Noble) for native builds Any Docker-capable Linux for containerized setup Windows: Windows 10/11 with WSL2 running Armbian / Ubuntu 24.04 Are they alternate to each other

Thanks for answering. Couple things: "As per documentation, run on a compatible host". Which documentation? can you provide link you define by this word? Define pls compatible host as it is very unclear in comparison to what i was reading ( it was unclear too) , or it is defined in docs you mentioned... banana pi pro is not supported as I understood. Igor Pecovnik was supporting this device for years. Maybe he can deliver more info in this subject. 2 points in reqs: - Armbian / Ubuntu Noble 24.04.x for native building or any Docker capable Linux for containerised - Windows 10/11 with WSL2 subsystem running Armbian / Ubuntu Noble 24.04.x Both required?

It's not about technicalities but basic logic. We have here situation where one program which should offer on/off functionality affects config of another one. @laibsch I'm not sure why have you reacted this way. Maybe i'm not proffessional but it's about linux and users should at least point on such things @robertoj Naturally, it's not about armbian itself, but generally linux related. F.e. when i configure another samba instance usual way and find it's not working by looking in logs and finding after some lost time that interface name has changed. How many people are requesting isssue with samba and loosing time just because of that?

fully agree with author statement. The same as change from ethx to endx is a step in wrong direction. Somebody was using windows too much. ifconfig is not even installed by default because of ip command. Distribution managers should be forced to stop such things. @laibsch "when you bring a network interface up or down that can obviously affect firewall rules" Is it a joke?

i should add some details: minimal version which is from yesterday for download, which has short description: "optimised for automation and production deployments" doesn't say too much. No idea what it means without better description. it's not in any of defined categories defined in faq. Is there any specs how to get sources and compile it for my small server with sata drive? I was not compiling kernel for about 30yrs+ however could do it with good specs . Many things changed... like even sources are not accessible as they were in the past. Naturally specs which i've seen is not the way to go.

Hi All What is current working image for banana pi pro? Can't find any except one in archive (bookworm) which is not perfect.