Jump to content

bschwehn

Members
  • Posts

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by bschwehn

  1. In case anyone missed it, Mikaey posted a workaround that does not require a new armbian image / kernel. Perhaps a viable workaround? I am not sure what the best fix is for armbian itself (so that it will be fixed in some upcoming release), so I don't feel confident submitting a pull request, but time permitting I will have another look this weekend.
  2. Haha, that's great, thanks! Silly me has been rebuilding full kernels for a workaround
  3. There is already some discussion about this topic at the other topic However, if this is causing you issues that need fixing now, it shouldn't be too hard to work around it manually until a better solution is available Simplest solution might be to have a script / service running (as root) that does - read temp from /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone0/temp - if temp is too high for you, throttle max frequency, e.g. using cpufreq-set -u 700000 then up the limit again once temp is reduced. Not ideal of course, but should work in the short term. How high is your temp getting before shutdown? Or what does armbianmonitor -m output before it shuts down? Just asking as I have a hard time getting my OPi PC2 above 82C under load, no heatsinks, but no casing either...
  4. FWIW, these messages seem to go away when building the dev branch without patch /patch/kernel/sunxi-dev/ths-29-sun4i-gpadc-iio-add-h5-thermal-zone.patch Not sure if this patch is compatible with the changes already done in the megous branch (like this patch) Still, throttling is done only down to 1104 MHz (not an issue for me personally, for me this throttle is enough for mine to not go above 81C @100% CPU usage for 10 minutes). Edit: Looks like I have it working now. I have basically added the patch ths-29-sun4i-gpadc-iio-add-h5-thermal-zone.patch directly to linux-mainline/orange-pi-5.0/arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi (instead of /arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi) Not sure why that should make a difference, but throttling now seems to take the trips I have configured (though it seems to use a different cooling map: ramp up: after insulating the board to get the temperature up: removing insulation lets temp drop again, and freq rise:
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Guidelines