Jump to content

t-bob

Members
  • Posts

    45
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by t-bob

  1. those details were just things i've read about on this and other forums.

     

    some people had luck with using devmem2 and doing echo's to the gpio device.

     

    that module doesnt exist for me.

     

    hciattach seems to load everything but i'm unable to bring the network up

     

    [   63.874269] Bluetooth: hci0: command 0x1003 tx timeout
    [   65.890379] Bluetooth: hci0: command 0x1001 tx timeout
    [   67.906448] Bluetooth: hci0: command 0x1009 tx timeout

  2. [  231.171784] r8723bs: module is from the staging directory, the quality is unknown, you have been warned.
    [  231.226752] RTL8723BS: module init start
    [  231.226761] RTL8723BS: rtl8723bs v4.3.5.5_12290.20140916_BTCOEX20140507-4E40
    [  231.226766] RTL8723BS: rtl8723bs BT-Coex version = BTCOEX20140507-4E40
    [  231.226840] RTL8723BS: module init ret =0
    [  231.308168] Bluetooth: Core ver 2.22
    [  231.308277] NET: Registered protocol family 31
    [  231.308281] Bluetooth: HCI device and connection manager initialized
    [  231.308300] Bluetooth: HCI socket layer initialized
    [  231.308309] Bluetooth: L2CAP socket layer initialized
    [  231.308339] Bluetooth: SCO socket layer initialized
    [  231.342572] Bluetooth: HCI UART driver ver 2.3
    [  231.342584] Bluetooth: HCI UART protocol H4 registered
    [  231.342588] Bluetooth: HCI UART protocol BCSP registered
    [  231.342675] Bluetooth: HCI UART protocol LL registered
    [  231.342680] Bluetooth: HCI UART protocol ATH3K registered
    [  231.342739] Bluetooth: HCI UART protocol Three-wire (H5) registered
    [  231.342989] Bluetooth: HCI UART protocol Intel registered
    [  231.343157] Bluetooth: HCI UART protocol Broadcom registered
    [  231.343207] Bluetooth: HCI UART protocol QCA registered
    [  231.343212] Bluetooth: HCI UART protocol AG6XX registered
    [  231.343216] Bluetooth: HCI UART protocol Marvell registered
    [  231.371480] Bluetooth: RFCOMM TTY layer initialized
    [  231.371501] Bluetooth: RFCOMM socket layer initialized
    [  231.371527] Bluetooth: RFCOMM ver 1.11
    [  231.530453] Bluetooth: BNEP (Ethernet Emulation) ver 1.3
    [  231.530461] Bluetooth: BNEP filters: protocol multicast
    [  231.530476] Bluetooth: BNEP socket layer initialized
    [  233.543018] Bluetooth: hci0: command 0x1003 tx timeout
    [  235.559107] Bluetooth: hci0: command 0x1001 tx timeout
    [  237.575212] Bluetooth: hci0: command 0x1009 tx timeout

  3. looks like it almost wants to work with 4.x and that firmware.

     

    modprobe r8723bs; modprobe hci_uart; modprobe bluetooth; modprobe rfcomm
    systemctl restart bluetooth
    hciattach -s 1500000 /dev/ttyS1 any bdaddr 43:29:B1:55:01:01

    hciconfig -a
    hci0:   Type: Primary  Bus: UART
            BD Address: 00:00:00:00:00:00  ACL MTU: 0:0  SCO MTU: 0:0
            DOWN INIT RUNNING
            RX bytes:0 acl:0 sco:0 events:0 errors:0
            TX bytes:12 acl:0 sco:0 commands:3 errors:0
            Features: 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00
            Packet type: DM1 DH1 HV1
            Link policy:
            Link mode: SLAVE ACCEPT

     

    hciconfig hci0 up
    Can't init device hci0: Connection timed out (110)

  4. I've built the latest armbian (5.48 & 5.46) for all the different versions (default, next & dev) and they all have issues starting the wifi !

     

    If i manually do an ifdown/ifup it usually comes up (say 80% of the time)

     

    I was just wondering if anyone else had seen this issue or is it just me .....

     

    Thanks, TB

  5. Hi,

     

    I was wondering if anyone was having issues with the ethernet port using the legacy kernel ?

     

    It does seem to kind of work ... it will get DHCP from the router and configure the routing tables etc but after that it goes wonky.

     

    When I do a ping test from the router I get "50/50 transmitted, 15/50 received, 70% loss". A ping test from the opi-win to the router gets a similar result.

     

    If I try a ping/ssh from a PC connected to the router I get a 95% packet loss :(

     

    Everything else seems to work fine ... HDMI, USB, WiFi (AP/STA modes) which is really, really nice.

     

    Thanks

     

    TB

  6. The only odd thing so far is the that USB ports dont seem to work :( The hubs appear but when you insert a usb key nothing appears in /dev or the syslog/kernel log etc etc. Will keep looking.

     

    Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
    Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
    Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
    Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub

  7. I just built the latest OPi Win image and WOW ... just about everything seems to be working. I'll test it over the coming days but AWESOME work guys.

     

    Wifi is back, eth0 is back and HDMI works !!!!!

     

    I've not tried any kind of GUI yet but I can get a console prompt on the TV & see the kernel boot messages

     

    Now for more testing, testing & testing ....

     

    TB

  8. Hi,

     

    I've been playing around with the latest build (Armbian_5.37_Orangepiwin_Debian_stretch_next_4.14.5.img.gz) just to see how things are going and I've noticed that the wifi has gone ?

     

    I saw that it doesnt talk about patching the ap6212 firmware anymore. Had a look around but couldnt see anything.

     

    I know it's a dev build but I hope that it's just a missing config file from that build branch or something.

     

    Thanks

     

    TB

  9. Yes, we'd never get complete agreement on a config ... but even if we could get an agreement on say the wifi chipset(s) and always include usb3 on anything that's not a 'zero' clone. Stuff like that would be good.

     

    The Wemos stuff looks interesting and not too pricey like some other ones.

     

    Well, the whole trickle down economy thing worked so well for everyone didnt it :)

     

    The master mode would only need OK performance and not excellent ... just web traffic (5+ users)

  10. Many thanks for the comments & info.

     

    Yes, the only guarantee in life is death & taxes :)

     

    All these SBC's have compromises that have to be made. Even the RPi which has awesome s/w support but no external wifi antenna, bad microSD slot (why didnt they pay an extra 5 cents and get the one that clicks in) & only 1G of ram.

     

    It's a pity we couldnt get someone to make a SBC with all the stuff that we want but I doubt that would ever happen :(

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Guidelines