Schnurzl

What 500€? How much time do you need to write the phrase "don't waste our time"? I though it is just paste & copy from other threads and you would enjoy writing this phrase. But don't worry I will no longer steal your very important time - bye bye. ;-)

OK, we further improve communication style from "wasting time" to call users "troll". Very interesting what happens if a user is reporting an issue.

If you like to hear Armbian is the only one for these devices, YES you are right. But I was not talking about the naming of linux releases just for these devices. I really do not understand why you call releases stable with KNOWN issues in BASIC functionality and you think that is the right way? I would understand if you call it stable as long as KNOWN issues are listed right beside the release on armbian web page. I get more and more the impression it is just not wanted. But with this stategy you guide users away from armbian to use different HW. Users are selecting/buying a SBC because of certain specs and interfaces and the presence of existing operating system. Later they understand, OK it was a wrong decision because some interfaces are not working at all >> lets switch to different HW and OS.....

I am not the administrator of your website. I testet recent release and gave feedback what is not working. The USB-C issue is a known issue for a longer time, because it was reported by different users. Who ever is administrating the armbian website can list the reported issues. If you are asking me to adminstrate the armbian website, give me the access.

Other distros call releases alpha, beta, nightly, early release. Stable releases are usually called stable after a longer time of testing and feedback from usesers. I do not understand the difficulties in understanding that. You got already feedback from different users about this issue with usb c and you are aware of this issue for a longer time. So why not adding a note to this release what is not working or not calling it any longer "stable". Open source does not mean name it better than it is - that is windows. Open source is the truth and forthrighness. I know my English is weak. So I would never call my stable.

Respect starts with how people communicate to each other. Reading the forum and posting from others I learned two things. 1. People reporting issues are not welcome at all. 2. The most favorit answer is "not wasting your time". I know you love to write it. Basic interfaces are not tested/ not working and even a simple reboot is not working - lets call it stable release. Any reported issues - just answer "don't waste my time, we are working for free". Yes I got it and you "earned my full respect".

USB-C not working on NanoPC T4 with buster server 5.8y. USB-C port just delivers power but no communication at all. On debian stretch USB-C is working (tested aigain, HW is OK). Can someone provide a list with what kernel/image is what not working. I like to use the device for OMV. I guess someone has a list of known/reported issues? I don't like to test image by image to slowly identify surprise by surprise for each image/kernel. I like to use the device for OMV including dockers.