RSS Bot

cli-patch: generalize to-git functionality with PUSH_TO_GITHUB and PUSH_TO_REPO & enable for u-boot as well as kernel cli-patch: generalize to-git functionality with PUSH_TO_GITHUB and PUSH_TO_REPO & enable for u-boot as well as kernel PUSH_TO_REPO=<url>: set the full git URL to push to PUSH_TO_GITHUB=<org>/<repo>: shorthand for pushing to GitHub; sets PUSH_TO_REPO note: be kind to GitHub, and use forks of torvalds/linux and u-boot/u-boot so GH has a decent base tree still, kernel pushes are huge, mostly due to the all-wifi-drivers commit that's always first and always slightly different note: when pushing to GitHub, keep in mind the pushed branch contains a GHA workflow, which will only run if you have GHA enabled on the repo examples (adapt to your username/forks): ./compile.sh BOARD=nanopct6 BRANCH=edge rewrite-kernel-patches PUSH_TO_GITHUB=rpardini/linux ./compile.sh BOARD=rock-5b BRANCH=legacy rewrite-uboot-patches PUSH_TO_GITHUB=rpardini/armbian-patched-u-boot View the full article

thinkpad-x13s: bump to jhovold's wip/sc8280xp-6.10-rc6; add fprintd back to Trixie; fixes thinkpad-x13s: bump to jhovold's wip/sc8280xp-6.10-rc6; add fprintd back to Trixie; fixes adapt according to most recent instructions from jhovold: https://github.com/jhovold/linux/wiki/X13s https://github.com/jhovold/linux/commit/993ae484d12ae6323647638000ed683c5222feb3 View the full article

Description Split off from https://github.com/armbian/build/pull/6902 as requested by @rpardini Add armhf support to Trixie Move the NETWORKING_STACK in main config to after family config to allow the family config to change it. How Has This Been Tested? [x] ./compile.sh BOARD=bananapir2 BRANCH=current BUILD_DESKTOP=no BUILD_MINIMAL=no EXPERT=yes KERNEL_CONFIGURE=no RELEASE=trixie [x] ./compile.sh BOARD=bananapir2 BRANCH=current BUILD_DESKTOP=no BUILD_MINIMAL=no EXPERT=yes KERNEL_CONFIGURE=no RELEASE=noble View the full article

Description Some beautification (new lines) Use only find without grep Board configs are also bash/shell files, so add them to the list. How Has This Been Tested? [x] Run lib/tools/shellfmt.sh Checklist: [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas [x] My changes generate no new warnings View the full article

Description Add parallel compression for xz with the option XZ_OPT="--threads=0" gzip and bzip were already using parallel compressors. xz has this option built-in, so add the argument to make use of it. Source: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200901151002.988547791@linuxfoundation.org/ Also change KBUILD user and host to make cat /proc/version show something like Linux version 6.9.8 (build@armbian) instead of Linux version 6.9.8 (armbian@next). build@armbian refers to the Armbian build framework (this repository) How Has This Been Tested? [x] ./compile.sh build BOARD=nanopi-r6c BRANCH=edge BUILD_DESKTOP=no BUILD_MINIMAL=no EXPERT=yes KERNEL_CONFIGURE=no RELEASE=trixie [ ] Benchmark could be done, but I don't know how I can force a full kernel rebuild without using any caching at all Checklist: [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas [x] My changes generate no new warnings [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules View the full article

Description The same configuration has been working fine for the similar NanoPi R6C for a while. Users have reported issues with the vendor U-Boot not able to boot. Ref: https://forum.armbian.com/topic/42105-report-bug-in-nanopi-r6s/ How Has This Been Tested? [x] ./compile.sh BOARD=nanopi-r6s BRANCH=edge BUILD_DESKTOP=no BUILD_MINIMAL=no EXPERT=yes KERNEL_CONFIGURE=no RELEASE=trixie uboot Checklist: [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas [ ] My changes generate no new warnings [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules View the full article

Description The mt7623 family only has one board (BananaPi R2) and has not been properly maintained in many years. Instead of fully removing the family, bump the kernel to 'current' 6.6 since the SoC and also the BananaPi R2 is mainlined and shouldn't cause too many troubles. No need for 'edge' kernel unless someone plans to step in as maintainer who bumps and tests it on every new kernel release. Also: Add armhf support to Trixie (was this disabled for a specific reason? If so, please let me know. It builds fine though) Move the NETWORKING_STACK in main config to after family config to allow the family config to change it. Please note: I do not own the hardware. Inspiration for changed were made from this 1.5 years old PR: https://github.com/armbian/build/pull/4873 By the way, when this is done, there will be no 4.x kernels anymore 🎉 (5.x I'm coming for you soon™ as well 😈) GitHub issue reference: https://github.com/armbian/build/issues/6821 Jira reference number AR-2392 How Has This Been Tested? [x] ./compile.sh BOARD=bananapir2 BRANCH=current BUILD_DESKTOP=no BUILD_MINIMAL=no EXPERT=yes KERNEL_CONFIGURE=no RELEASE=trixie [x] ./compile.sh BOARD=bananapir2 BRANCH=current BUILD_DESKTOP=no BUILD_MINIMAL=no EXPERT=yes KERNEL_CONFIGURE=no RELEASE=noble Checklist: [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas [x] My changes generate no new warnings [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules View the full article

multiple boards: bump u-boot from v2024.07-rcX to v2024.07 final u-boot v2024.07: rewrite patches against v2024.07 final rk322x-box: rewrite u-boot patches against v2024.07-rc5 rk3318-box: rewrite u-boot patches against v2024.07-rc5 jethubj200: rewrite u-boot patches against v2024.07 final multiple boards: bump u-boot from v2024.07-rcX to v2024.07 final after this, all patches were rewritten, but zero changes. success! View the full article

u-boot: embed armbian artifact version in CONFIG_LOCALVERSION u-boot: embed armbian artifact version in CONFIG_LOCALVERSION we're hacking at it anyway, so why not use it to uniquely identify the exact build View the full article

odroidm1: bump to u-boot v2024.07; replace defconfig patches with hook odroidm1: bump to u-boot v2024.07; replace defconfig patches with hook bump "armbian" env to reset env in SPI on first run View the full article

nanopi-r5s: u-boot: pci enum in preboot; disable armbian-led-state nanopi-r5s: u-boot: pci enum in preboot; disable armbian-led-state pci enum in preboot; required for working m.2 when booting some older kernels this board has an overlay (DEFAULT_OVERLAYS="nanopi-r5s-leds") to drive the LEDs, disable armbian-led-state service View the full article

Description also bump: rk3288 xt-q8l-v10 target rk322x-box target (was already v2024.07-rc5) rk3318-box target (was already v2024.07-rc5) rk322x-box and rk3318-box were already at v2024.07, since u-boot v2024.07 has been released some days ago, they have been moved from rc5 to release (see https://github.com/armbian/build/pull/6855) Asus Tinkerboard/S and xt-q8l-v10, which are both rk3288 targets, have been bumped from v2022.04 to v2024.07, trying to keep all the features working. I guess now the workaround cited here could be removed as well. GitHub issue reference: Jira reference number AR-2406 How Has This Been Tested? [x] Built image for both rk3288 targets successfully [x] Boot from emmc, sd and USB on xt-q8l-v10 [x] Boot from emmc and sd on Asus Tinkerboard S [x] UMS mode on Asus Tinkerboard S [x] Video console and USB keyboard working [x] Built uboot only for rk322x-box [x] Built uboot only for rk3318-box In particular, fresh images have been built, installed on sdcard, booted and then installed onto emmc with armbian-install script successfully for both Tinkerboard S and xt-q8l-v10 Side targets rk322x-box and rk3318-box have not been tested further: they have been througly tested with v2024.07-rc5 and I consider sufficient they don't break compilation with u-boot release version. Checklist: Please delete options that are not relevant. [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code [x] My changes generate no new warnings View the full article

Fix: dtb dtbo install, wrong select media sensors Disable incorrectly designed patches. They need to be aligned with the kernel code. How Has This Been Tested? Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Please also note any relevant details for your test configuration. [x] Test build sunxi [ ] Test build sunxi64 View the full article

Description move original OrangepiZero patch to be applied on that board only add patch for powering WiFi on Inovato Quadra with correct pin How Has This Been Tested? [x] Build test Checklist: [x] My changes generate no new warnings [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules View the full article

Description Radxa E52C is a rk3582 based board with dual 2.5G ethernet. This pr depends on https://github.com/armbian/linux-rockchip/pull/203. Since its soc is rk3582 so it should the same uboot patch from rock-5c to enable good ip cores disabled by u-boot. How Has This Been Tested? Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Please also note any relevant details for your test configuration. [x] ./compile.sh BOARD=radxa-e52c BRANCH=vendor BUILD_MINIMAL=no DEB_COMPRESS=xz KERNEL_CONFIGURE=no RELEASE=noble KERNEL_GIT=shallow BUILD_DESKTOP=no [x] Board boots fine. Checklist: Please delete options that are not relevant. [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas [x] My changes generate no new warnings [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules View the full article

Description sunxi-6.6: patches: A small cleaning was done. Delete unused ones. Update the changed ones. mk_format_patch: Copy only those patches that have changes in chunks View the full article

Description Maint. How Has This Been Tested? [ ] CI Checklist: [ ] My changes generate no new warnings View the full article

Description This PR moves OPi5 series Uboots to Radxa tree and gets rid of Xunlong uboot completely. How Has This Been Tested? [x] Opi 5 boots w/o SPI flash with newer Uboot [x] Opi 5 Plus boots w/o SPI flash with newer Uboot [x] Opi 5 Plus boots with NVME SSD Checklist: Please delete options that are not relevant. [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas [ ] My changes generate no new warnings [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules View the full article

Description This reverts commit 11245601d095645d2973a0e765ee0f9a01d51cc1. Fix doesn't work correctly. How Has This Been Tested? [ ] CI Checklist: [ ] My changes generate no new warnings [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules View the full article

Description As discussed in https://github.com/armbian/build/issues/6835 Deprecate legacy, but only remove from board configs for now. Print a warning, the whole branch is slated for removal. @efectn Please have a look at Opi5, there was some functions in the board config uboot_add_sata_target @amazingfate @igorpecovnik I think it would be best to change the default branch in the vendor kernel repo to the new 6.1-rk3 https://github.com/armbian/linux-rockchip what do you think? GitHub issue reference: https://github.com/armbian/build/issues/6835 Jira reference number AR-2394 How Has This Been Tested? [x] ./compile.sh kernel BOARD=nanopi-r6s BRANCH=legacy BUILD_DESKTOP=no BUILD_MINIMAL=no EXPERT=yes KERNEL_CONFIGURE=no RELEASE=trixie -> New deprecation warning appears Checklist: [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas [ ] My changes generate no new warnings [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules View the full article

Description The legacy U-Boot can't be built anymore and 4.4 is EOL. As discussed in https://github.com/armbian/build/issues/6821#issuecomment-2205234200 I didn't see any kernel or uboot patch folder. If I forgot something related to legacy, please let me know :) GitHub issue reference: https://github.com/armbian/build/issues/6821 Jira reference number AR-2392 Checklist: [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas View the full article

add board bigtreetech-cb2: BigTreeTech CB2 add board bigtreetech-cb2: BigTreeTech CB2 Co-authored-by: Ricardo Pardini ricardo@pardini.net View the full article

u-boot: use pipetty in place of unbuffer u-boot: use pipetty in place of unbuffer unbuffer never solved anything; pipetty might View the full article

mixtile-blade3: use default blobs & bump vendor u-boot to next-dev-v2024.03 mixtile-blade3: rk3588: u-boot: rewrite u-boot patches, no changes rewritten against ddc91cd08c10f625f7a7c93033042aa4071c78a8 - a specific commit in radxa's next-dev mixtile-blade3: rk3588: u-boot: bump to next-dev-v2024.03 drop 0004-cmd-source-fix-the-error-that-the-command-source-failed-to-execute.patch rebase the others mixtile-blade3: use default blobs View the full article

mekotronics: rk3588: u-boot: borrow patch to fix build on newer gcc mekotronics: rk3588: u-boot: rewrite u-boot patches, no changes rewritten against 609a77ef6e99c56aacd4b8d8f9c3056378f9c761 - a specific commit in radxa's next-dev mekotronics: rk3588: u-boot: borrow patch to fix build on newer gcc View the full article