Jump to content

wizardknight

Members
  • Posts

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. So I switched to a pure Debian install, and the exact same line //192.168.15.150/15tb_NAS/Data/ /mnt/NAS cifs rw,user=,password=,file_mode=0777,dir_mode=0777,async,x-systemd.automount 0 0 worked without issue. I am forced to assume there is an issue with this OS.
  2. I am about ready to shoot my want to be server. I have an Ubuntu samba server running a public share on my LAN. The share has no username or password required to make it windows friendly. No other system has issues accessing it. I have a new ROCK64 running Armbian 23.11.1 Bookworm CLI. It will not mount a CIFS share at boot, but will mount it with a mount -a command. Fstab entries that have not worked: //192.168.15.150/15tb_NAS/Data/ /mnt/NAS cifs rw,user=,password=,file_mode=0777,dir_mode=0777,async,x-systemd.automount 0 0 //192.168.15.150/15tb_NAS/Data/ /mnt/NAS cifs vers=3.0,rw,user=,password=,file_mode=0777,dir_mode=0777,async,x-systemd.automount,_netdev,x-systemd.after=network-online.target 0 0 //192.168.15.150/15tb_NAS/Data/ /mnt/NAS cifs rw,user=,password=,file_mode=0777,dir_mode=0777,async,x-systemd.automount,_netdev 0 0 Relivant journalctl -xb output: Feb 08 14:58:37 rock64 mount[1355]: mount error(101): Network is unreachable Feb 08 14:58:37 rock64 mount[1355]: Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g. man mount.cifs) and kernel log messages (dmesg) Feb 08 14:58:37 rock64 kernel: CIFS: Attempting to mount \\192.168.15.150\15tb_NAS Feb 08 14:58:37 rock64 kernel: CIFS: VFS: Error connecting to socket. Aborting operation. Feb 08 14:58:37 rock64 kernel: CIFS: VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -101 This looks like the network is not coming up in time, but I have tried x-systemd.automount and _netdev and x-systemd.after=network-online.target as options to make the system wait for the network. Shouldn't one of those fix the issue? Maybe I have been looking at this to long, and can't see the forest for the trees. Can anyone else see an issue here? I figure it's user error, but maybe there is a bug in this build? Feel free to ask questions if something is missing, and I will provide whatever I can.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Guidelines