Page 10 only says:
# There is a difference between Default VLAN and Native VLAN.
# Native VLAN can be of a value of same as Default VLAN
# which is 1.
# But when a native VLAN is changed for e.g in this case its 10,
# still the default VLAN remains 1.
It does not say anything about the differences. Just that it is a different thing. But neither where default VLAN is set nor how (by which part?)?
OK, I guess it is a best practice to do VLAN instead of creating different bridges? But bridges would also work?
I see the rule: Put everything in the bridge, but don't understand why. For example all devices from VLAN 102 are already in the bridge. So there should be no need to also add the interface eth0.102. Is there any reason to do this?
Same for wan. Why would I like it to join br0? If I leave it on it's own. I have one more seperation instead of seperation only by VLAN. So what is the interest?
That is exactly what I have done. But I only did the DSA part and the interfaces-Configuration and then used my configuration of dnsmasq.
Thank you so much for taking the time and answering my questions.