Search the Community
Showing results for 'AR100'.
Found 3 results
-
Starting from: https://github.com/armbian/build/commit/8278dc5e4215a84492dbe297fe243b878a60aaf4 Ref: https://github.com/crust-firmware/crust https://linux-sunxi.org/AR100
-
I had another distro and power button nicely shut down the system and it doesn't with armbian. I have read some things about it but I'm not even sure if they apply to this board or they are updated, about acpi events, logind and AR100, and I've read the official schematics of the board. It seems the button is connected to ADC pins. I installed acpid but acpi_listen reports nothing. But evtest does! root@bananapim5:~# evtest /dev/input/by-path/platform-adc_keys-event Input driver version is 1.0.1 Input device ID: bus 0x19 vendor 0x1 product 0x1 version 0x100 Input device name: "adc_keys" Supported events: Event type 0 (EV_SYN) Event type 1 (EV_KEY) Event code 259 (BTN_3) Properties: Testing ... (interrupt to exit) Event: time 1687334663.436476, type 1 (EV_KEY), code 259 (BTN_3), value 1 Event: time 1687334663.436476, -------------- SYN_REPORT ------------ Event: time 1687334663.948482, type 1 (EV_KEY), code 259 (BTN_3), value 0 Event: time 1687334663.948482, -------------- SYN_REPORT ------------ Is there a way to tell the system that this is event is an acpi event or a driver would be needed? I don't think I can make a real driver but I think I could get read the event from /dev/input/by-path/platform-adc_keys-event with python or something. If I can't I could always wrap evtest and make it do the reading. Thanks!
-
Description This PR adds support for Recore A5, A6, and A7 hardware. Recore is a 3D printer control board based on Allwinner A64. Since the board uses the AR100 for real time stepping, the SCP is disabled and instead a version of Klipper is loaded instead. How Has This Been Tested? The patches have been tested by building the current and legacy kernels with the minimal images. [ ] Minimal image with current kernel [ ] Minimal image with legacy kernel Checklist: [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation [ ] My changes generate no new warnings [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules View the full article
