NicoD Posted October 14, 2019 Posted October 14, 2019 Hi all. I've made a new video where I compare the above boards. I show specs, performance and transfer speeds of everything. Here's the video. Here my gathered data. Benchmarks ---------- Khadas VIM3 | Clock S/C | B/C | Blender | 7z S/C | 7Z B/C | glxgears | CPUMiner | SBCBench | glmark2 Ubuntu Bionic 1.80Ghz 2.21Ghz 13m22s 1582 2322 192FPS 12.90 http://ix.io/1P6F Ubuntu XFCE 1.80Ghz 2.21Ghz 12m43s 1586 2316 355FPS 12.90 http://ix.io/1PhE Armbian Bionic 1.80Ghz 2.11Ghz 11m48s 1610 2244 495FPS Armbian Bionic 1.80Ghz 2.21Ghz 11m28s 1613 2348 510FPS 12.85 http://ix.io/1PD2 Armbian Disco 1.80Ghz 2.21Ghz 11m11s http://ix.io/1PDR Armbian Buster 1.80Ghz 2.21Ghz 11m21s 1644 2374 590FPS 12.80 http://ix.io/1PEm RockPi 4B | Clock S/C | B/C | Blender | 7z S/C | 7Z B/C | glxgears | CPUMiner | SBCBench Debian Stretch64 1.51Ghz 2.02Ghz 21m44s 1340 1988 90FPS 8.79 http://ix.io/1Rrl Debian Stretch64 1.42Ghz 1.80Ghz 23m34s 1260 1789 90FPS 8.07 http://ix.io/1RrE 50 Armbian Disco 1.42Ghz 1.80Ghz 21m38s 1246 1811 254FPS 9.90 Armbian Bionic 1.42Ghz 1.80Ghz 22m19s 1247 1809 255FPS 9.55 http://ix.io/1Rz3 Armbian Bionic5.4.0RC4 75 NanoPi M4 | Clock S/C | B/C | Blender | 7z S/C | 7Z B/C | glxgears | CPUMiner | SBCBench Armbian Bionic 1.42Ghz 1.80Ghz 22m18s 1249 1813 250FPS 9.50 http://ix.io/1ORz Armbian Stretch 1.42Ghz 1.80Ghz 23m48s 1269 1789 7.97 http://ix.io/1ORY Armbian Buster 1.42Ghz 1.80Ghz 21m23s 1277 1816 290FPS 10.07 http://ix.io/1P6X Armbian Disco 1.42Ghz 1.80Ghz 20m34s 1252 1823 260FPS 9.95 http://ix.io/1PbD Odroid N2 | Clock S/C | B/C | Blender | 7z S/C | 7Z B/C | glxgears | CPUMiner | SBCBench Armbian Bionic 1.9Ghz 1.8Ghz 14m29s 1629 1891 Atomic Pi | Clock S/C | B/C | Blender | 7z S/C | 7Z B/C | glxgears | CPUMiner | SBCBench Ubuntu Disco 1.67Ghz 27m58s 1441 60FPS Storage ------- NanoPi M4 | Read | Write 32GB eMMC 180MB/s Samsung EVO SD-cardreader 68.1MB/s 20.6MB/s USB3-Sata 395.5MB/s 411.5MB/s Odroid N2 | Read | Write 32GB eMMV 151.4MB/s Samsung EVO SD-cardreader 61.9MB/s 14.2MB/s USB3-SATA 228.5MB/s 239.6MB/s Khadas VIM3 | Read | Write eMMC 16GB 165.9MB/s 60 MB/s SSD over USB3 286.1 MB/s 380.3 MB/s write SSD over USB2 : 40.2 MB/s Samsung EVO plus with on-board sd-reader : 10.2MB/s write 22.1MB/s read with USB3 sd-reader : 31.7MB/s write 88.6MB/s read RockPi4B | Read | Write On-board sd 23.9 MB/s 14.3 MB/s ssd over USB3 402.7 MB/s 406.2 MB/s write NVMe 730 MB/s 745.0 MB/s write 1GB 10GB 432MB/s
HL13 Posted November 1, 2019 Posted November 1, 2019 Hi, Could you check NVMe speed for Khadas VIM3, please? I guess it`s possible to connect NVMe SSD direct to the board without Khadas M2X Extension Board. Thank you.
NicoD Posted November 1, 2019 Author Posted November 1, 2019 4 hours ago, HL13 said: Hi, Could you check NVMe speed for Khadas VIM3, please? I guess it`s possible to connect NVMe SSD direct to the board without Khadas M2X Extension Board. Thank you. The NVMe on the VIM3 is at the USB3 speed. So it's the USB3 speed that I show. You need to disable the USB3 to be able to use this. So using a USB3 ssd is better since you can plug other USB3 devices then(with usb3 hub). The NVMe is just an extra that doesn't make nuch sense It's the CPU that makes this board what it is. But the I/O could be better.
HL13 Posted November 1, 2019 Posted November 1, 2019 2 hours ago, NicoD said: The NVMe on the VIM3 is at the USB3 speed. Have you checked? ;-) Looks like...the board may have the higher speed for NVMe then USB3.0 Amlogic A311Dhttps://dl.khadas.com/Hardware/VIM3/Datasheet/A311D_Datasheet_01_Wesion.pdf Integrated I/O Controllers and Interfaces • One USB SS and PCIe 2.0 combo interface up to 5Gbps, supporting 2 configurations: o 1 USB 2.0 Host + 1 PCIe o 1 USB3.0 (No PCIe) Diff switch:https://dl.khadas.com/Hardware/VIM3/Schematic/VIM3_V12_Sch.pdf FUSB340: USB 3.1 SuperSpeed Data Switch, 10 Gbps https://www.onsemi.com/products/interfaces/analog-switches/fusb340 And the second intresting point. NVMe may "fix" the problem "Wifi issue with USB3/No 5Ghz wifi. Could have solved the USB3 interference"
NicoD Posted November 1, 2019 Author Posted November 1, 2019 2 minutes ago, HL13 said: Have you checked? ;-) Looks like...the board may have the higher speed for PCIe then USB3.0 Interesting. 4 minutes ago, HL13 said: FUSB340: USB 3.1 SuperSpeed Data Switch, 10 Gbps I should test this indeed. I thought the NVMe goes dierectly through the USB3.0 port. I don't see where it is connected to here. 8 minutes ago, HL13 said: And the second intresting point. NVMe may "fix" the problem "Wifi issue with USB3/No 5Ghz wifi. Could have solved the USB3 interference" Could be, if it's not thru the same USB3 lane. Good things to find out. Thanks.
HL13 Posted November 2, 2019 Posted November 2, 2019 I`ve found NVMe speed for VIM3 in Khadas official "Performance & Benchmark":https://dl.khadas.com/Hardware/VIM3/Performance/VIM3_V11_Performance_190624.pdf 1
NicoD Posted November 15, 2019 Author Posted November 15, 2019 On 11/2/2019 at 8:27 PM, HL13 said: I`ve found NVMe speed for VIM3 in Khadas official "Performance & Benchmark":https://dl.khadas.com/Hardware/VIM3/Performance/VIM3_V11_Performance_190624.pdf Too bad performance overall isn't that great in I/O. SD card is just aweful, 16GB eMMC is too small for me. With USB3 to SATA adapter ssd also isn't performing great. It's got the best CPU by far. But the bandwidth towards it isn't that great. If only there was an extra PCIe x4 lane on this SoC. That would have made a world of difference. The RK3399's have amazing I/O, ok CPU. But I wished I had the I/O of RK3399 and the CPU, thermals and power efficiency of the s922x/a311d. And on top good gpu/vpu drivers. Dreams for the future.
Recommended Posts