Jump to content

Armbian Stretch is not using Predictable Network Interface Names. Why?


Recommended Posts

Posted

First of all, sorry if I'm asking something really obvious, but I'm new in Linux. 

 

Hi! 

I just have a new fresh install of Armbian Stretch on my Cubox, and I just realized that Armbian isn't using the Predictable Network Interface Names but the old one. 

 

gnWPovs.png

root@opl-cubox:/home/lpuerto# ifconfig
eth0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
        inet 192.168.1.6  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.1.255
        inet6 fe80::d263:b4ff:fe00:8297  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x20<link>
        ether d0:63:b4:00:82:97  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
        RX packets 411  bytes 50456 (49.2 KiB)
        RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
        TX packets 308  bytes 36582 (35.7 KiB)
        TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING>  mtu 65536
        inet 127.0.0.1  netmask 255.0.0.0
        inet6 ::1  prefixlen 128  scopeid 0x10<host>
        loop  txqueuelen 1000  (Local Loopback)
        RX packets 0  bytes 0 (0.0 B)
        RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
        TX packets 0  bytes 0 (0.0 B)
        TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
wlan0: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
        ether 6c:ad:f8:1d:38:8b  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
        RX packets 0  bytes 0 (0.0 B)
        RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
        TX packets 0  bytes 0 (0.0 B)
        TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

I can't even find the /etc/dhcpcd.conf file

 

Is this correct or I've done something wrong? 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Guidelines