1 1
lpuerto

Armbian Stretch is not using Predictable Network Interface Names. Why?

Recommended Posts

First of all, sorry if I'm asking something really obvious, but I'm new in Linux. 

 

Hi! 

I just have a new fresh install of Armbian Stretch on my Cubox, and I just realized that Armbian isn't using the Predictable Network Interface Names but the old one. 

 

gnWPovs.png

root@opl-cubox:/home/lpuerto# ifconfig
eth0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
        inet 192.168.1.6  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.1.255
        inet6 fe80::d263:b4ff:fe00:8297  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x20<link>
        ether d0:63:b4:00:82:97  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
        RX packets 411  bytes 50456 (49.2 KiB)
        RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
        TX packets 308  bytes 36582 (35.7 KiB)
        TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING>  mtu 65536
        inet 127.0.0.1  netmask 255.0.0.0
        inet6 ::1  prefixlen 128  scopeid 0x10<host>
        loop  txqueuelen 1000  (Local Loopback)
        RX packets 0  bytes 0 (0.0 B)
        RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
        TX packets 0  bytes 0 (0.0 B)
        TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
wlan0: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
        ether 6c:ad:f8:1d:38:8b  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
        RX packets 0  bytes 0 (0.0 B)
        RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
        TX packets 0  bytes 0 (0.0 B)
        TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

I can't even find the /etc/dhcpcd.conf file

 

Is this correct or I've done something wrong? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
1 1