Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have read a few forum posts on the topic but I'm still not convinced.

 

Which one is safer and more stable for Armbian based NAS?

 

I previously had issues and data loss on BTRFS. However I now hear that it's much more stable. I been using ZFS on FreeBSD without any issues for years and I would prefer it but it seems that it's a hit and miss to get it working. I just did and it was very easy but I read that people have random issues with upgrades etc.

 

Any thoughts?

 

Thanks!

a

 

Posted
6 hours ago, tenox2 said:

I have read a few forum posts on the topic but I'm still not convinced.

 

I assume you are referring to: Why I prefer ZFS over btrfs ?  If not, then I would give it a read.  It's long but a lot of good points are made both ways.

Posted
9 hours ago, TRS-80 said:

 

I assume you are referring to: Why I prefer ZFS over btrfs ?  If not, then I would give it a read.  It's long but a lot of good points are made both ways.

Yes I am. A lot of good points but doesn't help choosing one over the other.

Posted

You could always flip a coin.  :D

 

Jokes aside (and Reading your OP again carefully) you did state that you lean towards ZFS.  Which I do too, personally.  Anyway, I can tell you that running ZFS on Armbian have become significantly easier lately, as all the excitement around it got Igor working on it and I am pretty sure the relevant bits are built into the kernels that Armbian are shipping these days.  And this was not the case even just a few months ago (it was just being worked on around the time of the above linked post in fact).  As that seemed to be your main objection, I am not sure if that fact alone is enough to finally nudge you to decide in that direction or not.

 

FWIW, I am planning a ZFS build finally, based on ROCKPro64 and a SATA board which I read reports of working well.  I would just recommend doing your homework, especially around related hardware, and how well supported it is in Linux.

Posted

Well looks like we are on the same boat. I guess maybe what I would love to hear is an "official" (if there is such a thing) statement from Raspbian regarding ZFS support. Whats reassuring so far is that Kobol (Hlios NAS) for example looks like they are recommending ZFS on Armbian.

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Guidelines