Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

What a rare thing I am. Maybe a trasgo, I don't know. Got chromium from apt and worked like a charm.

Edited by maka
Posted

I installed u-boot to eMMC, but found that there is no saveenv command, does anybody know why? 

 

Tried to compile u-boot myself but when I run make command in u-boot source I got following error: 

Image 'simple-bin' is missing external blobs and is non-functional: rockchip-tpl atf-bl31

/binman/simple-bin/mkimage/rockchip-tpl (rockchip-tpl):
   An external TPL is required to initialize DRAM. Get the external TPL
   binary and build with ROCKCHIP_TPL=/path/to/ddr.bin. One possible source
   for the external TPL binary is https://github.com/rockchip-linux/rkbin.

/binman/simple-bin/fit/images/@atf-SEQ/atf-bl31 (atf-bl31):
   See the documentation for your board. You may need to build ARM Trusted
   Firmware and build with BL31=/path/to/bl31.bin

Image 'simple-bin' is missing optional external blobs but is still functional: tee-os

/binman/simple-bin/fit/images/@tee-SEQ/tee-os (tee-os):
   See the documentation for your board. You may need to build Open Portable
   Trusted Execution Environment (OP-TEE) and build with TEE=/path/to/tee.bin

Image 'simple-bin-spi' is missing external blobs and is non-functional: rockchip-tpl

/binman/simple-bin-spi/mkimage/rockchip-tpl (rockchip-tpl):
   An external TPL is required to initialize DRAM. Get the external TPL
   binary and build with ROCKCHIP_TPL=/path/to/ddr.bin. One possible source
   for the external TPL binary is https://github.com/rockchip-linux/rkbin.

Some images are invalid
make: *** [Makefile:1126: .binman_stamp] Error 103

 

I got following binary files in the folder:

u-boot-dtb.bin  u-boot-nodtb.bin  u-boot-rockchip-spi.bin  u-boot-rockchip.bin  u-boot.bin

But none of them starts with bytes "RKNS" as in /usr/lib/linux-u-boot-edge-h96-tvbox-3566/u-boot-rockchip.bin . So I suspect that they are not the one I should burn to eMMC

Posted (edited)

Where did you read the u-boot building?

 

export BL31=../trusted-firmware-a/build/rk3568/release/bl31/bl31.elf [or]export BL31=../rkbin/bin/rk35/rk3568_bl31_v1.34.elf

export ROCKCHIP_TPL=../rkbin/bin/rk35/rk3568_ddr_1560MHz_v1.13.bin

make evb-rk3568_defconfig

make CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu-

 

You have not done first and second step. This is an example for another board, an sbc better than your box, and the files you have to use is unknown. Don't use this ones or maybe you get a brick. You have been warned.

Edited by maka
Posted (edited)
46 minutes ago, maka said:

Where did you read the u-boot building?

 

export BL31=../trusted-firmware-a/build/rk3568/release/bl31/bl31.elf [or]export BL31=../rkbin/bin/rk35/rk3568_bl31_v1.34.elf

export ROCKCHIP_TPL=../rkbin/bin/rk35/rk3568_ddr_1560MHz_v1.13.bin

make evb-rk3568_defconfig make

CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu-

 

You have not done first and second step. This is an example for another board, an sbc better than your box, and the files you have to use is unknown. Don't use this ones or maybe you get a brick. You have been warned.

You are right, I didn't do the first two steps. I got the base config from running "./compile.sh BOARD=h96-tvbox-3566 BRANCH=edge uboot-config". Then 'make menuconfig' and make. 

It's hard to find documentation for compile u-boot only. 

 

Will try your steps. But where do I find file rk3568_bl31_v1.34.elf and rk3568_ddr_1560MHz_v1.13.bin? I could find it in the source folder. 

Edited by DreamDreams
Posted

I found the binary files. On my system they have different version. 

 

I successfully compiled and burn new u-boot to my board. But saveenv is still missing. 

 

# grep SAVEENV .config
CONFIG_CMD_SAVEENV=y
CONFIG_SAVEENV=y

 

U-Boot 2024.07-armbian-2024.07-S3f77-P0000-H3f52-Vc494-Bda0a-R448a (Nov 19 2024 - 15:22:24 +0800)

Model: Generic RK3566/RK3568
DRAM:  8 GiB (effective 7.7 GiB)
Core:  251 devices, 25 uclasses, devicetree: separate
MMC:   mmc@fe2b0000: 1, mmc@fe310000: 0
Loading Environment from nowhere... OK
In:    serial@fe660000
Out:   serial@fe660000
Err:   serial@fe660000
Model: Generic RK3566/RK3568
Net:   No ethernet found.
Hit any key to stop autoboot:  0 
Scanning for bootflows in all bootdevs
Seq  Method       State   Uclass    Part  Name                      Filename
---  -----------  ------  --------  ----  ------------------------  ----------------
Scanning global bootmeth 'efi_mgr':
Card did not respond to voltage select! : -110
No EFI system partition
No EFI system partition
Failed to persist EFI variables
No EFI system partition
Failed to persist EFI variables
No EFI system partition
Failed to persist EFI variables
  0  efi_mgr      ready   (none)       0  <NULL>                    
** Booting bootflow '<NULL>' with efi_mgr
Loading Boot0000 'mmc 0' failed
EFI boot manager: Cannot load any image
Boot failed (err=-14)
Scanning bootdev 'mmc@fe2b0000.bootdev':
Card did not respond to voltage select! : -110
Scanning bootdev 'mmc@fe310000.bootdev':
Unknown uclass 'nvme' in label
Unknown uclass 'scsi' in label
No USB controllers found
No ethernet found.
No ethernet found.
No more bootdevs
---  -----------  ------  --------  ----  ------------------------  ----------------
(1 bootflow, 1 valid)
=> 
=> 
=> 
=> 
=> <INTERRUPT>
=> 
=> saveenv
Unknown command 'saveenv' - try 'help'

 

Posted

Another question, how can I determine whter my memory is capable of 1560MHz or 1056MHz? 

 

Below is u-boot output when reset. 

=> reset
resetting ...
DDR 2d653b3476 typ 24/01/20-15:04:19,fwver: v1.21
ln
LP4/4x derate en, other dram:1x trefi
SRX
ddrconfig:7
LPDDR4X, 324MHz
BW=32 Col=10 Bk=8 CS0 Row=17 CS1 Row=17 CS=2 Die BW=8 Size=8192MB
tdqss: cs0 dqs0: 72ps, dqs1: -72ps, dqs2: -48ps, dqs3: -144ps, 
tdqss: cs1 dqs0: 72ps, dqs1: -72ps, dqs2: -24ps, dqs3: -144ps,

 

Posted

Now I'm very disapointed with this box. Comparing to my Firefly-rk3399, it has 2x memory, newer CPU/GPU, but performance is worse. 

 

glmark2-es2-wayland score: RK3399 1100, RK3566 500

ffmpeg -hwaccel drm -benchmark on same AVC/H264 video, RK3399 40X, RK3566 10X

 

And GUI smothiness is much worse than RK3399. I can feel the difference, and it is very obvious. 

Kernel version are both 6.12 mainline. 

Posted

Nothing rare in your review. You are comparing a high price rk3399 with a low one rk3566. The last makes a good job because is well supported and can move a Desktop for little money. With LXQT works wonderfull.

Posted
20 minutes ago, maka said:

Nothing rare in your review. You are comparing a high price rk3399 with a low one rk3566. The last makes a good job because is well supported and can move a Desktop for little money. With LXQT works wonderfull.

Is RK3399 more expansive? I was missled by my purchase price. And on paper, RK3399's Mali T860 is much weaker than RK3566's Mali G52. 

Posted

I'd like to try Joshua Riek's image, but not sure how. @Hqnicolas, your link in previous post is 404 now. 

 

I tried to boot kernel linux-image-vendor-rk35xx with rk3566-h96-tvbox.dtb but got instant kernel panic. 

Posted (edited)

Joshua ryek had to halt his project because of problems. I hope he is getting better know. His interest in rk3566 is   almost zero. Only help could change this.

 

RK3399's gpu Mali T860 MP4 is much more powerful than rk3566's Mali G52 2EE (MP1).

Edited by maka

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Guidelines