Alex83

Members
  • Content Count

    9
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. I deleted the allwinner and rockchip folders, but after another apt upgrade it's the same error (no space left).
  2. what should I do with the full root partition with 256MB ITS WITH EVERY CHANGE OF KERNEL OR BOOT OPTIONS AN ERROR MESSAGE FOR BOOT PARTITION (NO SPACE LEFT)
  3. @balbes150 Thank you for your unique great work! I think also it's a great idea to unify the images and just to replace in uEnv.ini the dtb filename to the correct ones! I used the file Armbian_19.11.5_Aml-g12_bionic_dev_5.5.0-rc4_20191228.img.xz for using it on my CSA93 S912 Amlogic device with 3GB DDR3 and 32GB ROM. The Chipset for Ethernet works! I used aml_autoscript in Android-Update-Firmware-Manually then it just started till the Tiger S912 Logo and hung. After replacing in uEnv.ini the FIRST line to: "dtb_name=/dtb/amlogic/meson-gxm-q200.dtb" then it booted! It seems like meson-gxm-q200.dtb works for S912 devices with 1000 Mbit/s interfaces. Here is my dmesg: So the driver for RTL8211F Gigabit Ethernet works on 100 Mbit/s and 1Gbe/s nearly perfect! I did an iperf3 messurement from PC and Banana PI. From BananaPI the performance was ~800 Mbit/s RX/TX and with my PC the CSA93 performed to 950 Mbit/s RX/TX. Problems: - No sound - No Wifi. I guess it's the problem of ath10k, but thought it's already officially implemented in the newer builds (I have a Qualcomm QCA9377 in my box) - Boot partition is formated to FAT16 and just 256 MB. I can't resize with another system because it says it has to change into FAT32 then and maybe the bootloader doesn't like that. - Reason for this is, that I wanna use wireguard and when it comes to installation it says no space left on boot partition. Actually there is no space left of the 256 MB and it seems to be impossible to extend the size without damaging the fs. Would love if you have some hints how to proceed!
  4. Hey Igor, thank you very much for your answer. I tried what you suggested and ended up to set up the whole system new. Now I bought a Banana Pi M2+ with 4x960MHz. After long research I noticed that an iperf3 measurement achieve directly from the device through my wireguard tunnel nearly the gross bandwidth of 34 Mbit/s and when I route over the M2+ the bandwidth drops to 10 Mbit/s. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 2.90 MBytes 24.3 Mbits/sec [ 7] 2.00-3.00 sec 1.35 MBytes 11.3 Mbits/sec [ 9] 2.00-3.00 sec 1.86 MBytes 15.6 Mbits/sec [ 11] 2.00-3.00 sec 3.36 MBytes 28.2 Mbits/sec [SUM] 2.00-3.00 sec 9.47 MBytes 79.5 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 3.08 MBytes 25.8 Mbits/sec [ 7] 3.00-4.00 sec 2.04 MBytes 17.1 Mbits/sec [ 9] 3.00-4.00 sec 2.99 MBytes 25.1 Mbits/sec [ 11] 3.00-4.00 sec 1.51 MBytes 12.7 Mbits/sec [SUM] 3.00-4.00 sec 9.63 MBytes 80.8 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 1.75 MBytes 14.6 Mbits/sec [ 7] 4.00-5.00 sec 1.86 MBytes 15.6 Mbits/sec [ 9] 4.00-5.00 sec 3.26 MBytes 27.4 Mbits/sec [ 11] 4.00-5.00 sec 2.54 MBytes 21.3 Mbits/sec [SUM] 4.00-5.00 sec 9.41 MBytes 78.9 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 1.95 MBytes 16.3 Mbits/sec [ 7] 5.00-6.00 sec 2.19 MBytes 18.4 Mbits/sec [ 9] 5.00-6.00 sec 3.18 MBytes 26.7 Mbits/sec [ 11] 5.00-6.00 sec 2.26 MBytes 18.9 Mbits/sec [SUM] 5.00-6.00 sec 9.57 MBytes 80.3 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 1.93 MBytes 16.2 Mbits/sec [ 7] 6.00-7.00 sec 2.64 MBytes 22.1 Mbits/sec [ 9] 6.00-7.00 sec 2.63 MBytes 22.1 Mbits/sec [ 11] 6.00-7.00 sec 2.40 MBytes 20.2 Mbits/sec [SUM] 6.00-7.00 sec 9.60 MBytes 80.5 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 1.91 MBytes 16.0 Mbits/sec [ 7] 7.00-8.00 sec 1.86 MBytes 15.6 Mbits/sec [ 9] 7.00-8.00 sec 2.83 MBytes 23.7 Mbits/sec [ 11] 7.00-8.00 sec 3.29 MBytes 27.6 Mbits/sec [SUM] 7.00-8.00 sec 9.88 MBytes 82.9 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 2.87 MBytes 24.1 Mbits/sec [ 7] 8.00-9.00 sec 2.20 MBytes 18.5 Mbits/sec [ 9] 8.00-9.00 sec 1.93 MBytes 16.2 Mbits/sec [ 11] 8.00-9.00 sec 2.79 MBytes 23.4 Mbits/sec [SUM] 8.00-9.00 sec 9.79 MBytes 82.1 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 2.91 MBytes 24.4 Mbits/sec [ 7] 9.00-10.00 sec 2.12 MBytes 17.8 Mbits/sec [ 9] 9.00-10.00 sec 2.16 MBytes 18.1 Mbits/sec [ 11] 9.00-10.00 sec 2.14 MBytes 17.9 Mbits/sec [SUM] 9.00-10.00 sec 9.32 MBytes 78.2 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ 5] 10.00-10.01 sec 19.8 KBytes 29.1 Mbits/sec [ 7] 10.00-10.01 sec 5.66 KBytes 8.32 Mbits/sec [ 9] 10.00-10.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec [ 11] 10.00-10.01 sec 15.6 KBytes 22.9 Mbits/sec [SUM] 10.00-10.01 sec 41.0 KBytes 60.2 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec sender [ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 24.0 MBytes 20.1 Mbits/sec receiver [ 7] 0.00-10.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec sender [ 7] 0.00-10.01 sec 22.0 MBytes 18.4 Mbits/sec receiver [ 9] 0.00-10.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec sender [ 9] 0.00-10.01 sec 24.6 MBytes 20.6 Mbits/sec receiver [ 11] 0.00-10.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec sender [ 11] 0.00-10.01 sec 24.6 MBytes 20.7 Mbits/sec receiver [SUM] 0.00-10.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec sender [SUM] 0.00-10.01 sec 95.1 MBytes 79.8 Mbits/sec receiver ----------------------------------------------------------- Server listening on 5201 ----------------------------------------------------------- Here is the measurement from my device which is routed to the m2+ If you measure straight to M2+ it transmits in both directions around 82 Mbit/s and that is OK because of a 100 Mbit/s switch in between. I also tried it straight with 1 Gbe but the transmit through the tunnel is still 10 MBit/s average. The interesting thing is in the first second of measurement it's also 31 Mbit/s, second is 0 and then it continues which 7 to 10. It is so annoying and strange....
  5. Hi Igor, thanks for your quick and nice response. Unfortunately I am not able to compile by myself. I guess the problem is something which is easier to fix. With this variations of latency noone can use wireguard for any useful services. So I guess there is am easier solution. With my old TPlink Wr841 the same wireguard link works fine and with constant latency. Unfortunately if there is load the router is to slow to keep the low latency, so I thought best idea is let routers simply be routers with proprietary software nowadays and take powerful Arm devices for wireguard tunnel and routing the traffic through. Anyway, how can we find the root cause of the latency problems? I have more informations if it helps Edit: I guess it has something to do with the governor and the CPU profile. I tried changing it from ondemand to performance and conservative. Also I tried changing the frequency to 912 MHz minimum and 960 MHz maximum. Nothing changed with the ping times... root@bananapi:/# armbianmonitor -u System diagnosis information will now be uploaded to /usr/b n/armbianmonitor: line 385: read: read error: 0: Connection timed out /usr/bin/armbianmonitor: line 386: [: 46.8: integer express on expected http://ix.io/25P4 Please post the URL in the forum where you've been asked fo . root@bananapi:/#
  6. Hi, just noticed that with Banana M1 and wireguard something stragne happens... As described I just installed package wireguard-tools and built a wireguard tunnel. The ping variation is too high. Here is a log of Banana-PI-Tunnel: And the same time to same destination from my Ubuntu-Desktop-Wireguard-Tunnel: Both is without any traffic (beside ping) over the wg-tunnel. The Banana isn't overloaded. Just installed armbian bionic without desktop and first thing to try was the tunnel from clean setup. Also the MTU of the wireguard is set to 1300 for the test to prevent fragmentation. Any ideas what's wrong and how to get wireguard-dkms-package or low-latency-Kernels onto the Banana PI? I think there is a problem with priority and realtime of the wireguard-protocol.
  7. Hi, i have an CSA93 device with S912 chipset and AP6339 3GB DDR3 RAM and 32 GB Flash. It's this device: Link to explain which device I use Could someone tell me which .dtb file I need to use and if I can boot this device by SD-Card and/or USB-Sticks? Thank you very much in advance!
  8. Hi, is it possible to boot Armbian on Alfawise Z28 Pro 2GB/16GB from SD-Card without destroying Android on EMMC? If yes, could anyone provide the image for SD?
  9. Hi guys, As I see the subject of the topic was about the Aflawise Z28 pro Box with 2 GB RAM / 16 GB ROM and 1GBE. So could someone please update the current situation and tell how it is going or especially why it's more difficult to use the SD-card with this device. Thanks in advance guys. Edit: Hey guys, I found some Linux-Loaders for all Rockchip devices (RK3229, RK3328 and others). Maybe it helps you to find a good way to improve our devices http://www38.zippyshare.com/v/MQhd79D5/file.html