Alex83

Members
  • Content Count

    22
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Alex83

  • Rank
    Member

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Hey guys, great and awesome work! I hope video acceleration will work soon. I just updated my V88 Mini with working wifi, NAND installation but it hung during upgrade. After new replug and plug again the device worked again and no more upgrades. Unfortunately the reboot still isn't working... @jock Have you found a fix for the reboot problem? The upgrade wasn't enough to fix it. Update: Since the upgrade the wifi performance went drastically down! Before I got around 30 Mbit/s through Iperf3 measurements and now it went down to 0,5 Mbit/s - 1 Mbit/s. I don't know what happened with the driver seems to be a problem now.
  2. Please don't give up guys! We all hope for big developments in the arm sector and especially with that RK and Amlogic devices. As I said maybe it's worth another Thread to collect ideas what to do with that hardware. As far as I understand, YouTube, Netflix or Disney+ Player won't unfortunately be the best scenarios to use this device in the near future...
  3. @fabiobassa: Especially for you I did also setup a wireguard-tunnel to my bannana pi (also running armbian) with 1 GbE interface. Here is the result without the tunnel: root@bananapi:/etc/wireguard# iperf3 -c 192.168.178.174 -i 1 -t 5 -P 1 -R Connecting to host 192.168.178.174, port 5201 Reverse mode, remote host 192.168.178.174 is sending [ 4] local 192.168.178.193 port 35768 connected to 192.168.178.174 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 11.2 MBytes 94.1 Mbits/sec [ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 11.2 MBytes 94.0 Mbits/sec [ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 11.2 MBytes 94.1 Mbits/sec [ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 11.2 MBytes 93.9 Mbits/sec [ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 11.2 MBytes 94.1 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr [ 4] 0.00-5.00 sec 56.4 MBytes 94.7 Mbits/sec 0 sender [ 4] 0.00-5.00 sec 56.2 MBytes 94.3 Mbits/sec receiver iperf Done. root@bananapi:/etc/wireguard# iperf3 -c 192.168.178.174 -i 1 -t 5 -P 1 Connecting to host 192.168.178.174, port 5201 [ 4] local 192.168.178.193 port 35772 connected to 192.168.178.174 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr Cwnd [ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 11.3 MBytes 95.0 Mbits/sec 96 43.8 KBytes [ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 11.2 MBytes 94.0 Mbits/sec 96 31.1 KBytes [ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 11.2 MBytes 93.8 Mbits/sec 102 25.5 KBytes [ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 11.3 MBytes 94.4 Mbits/sec 77 33.9 KBytes [ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 11.0 MBytes 92.3 Mbits/sec 102 31.1 KBytes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr [ 4] 0.00-5.00 sec 56.0 MBytes 93.9 Mbits/sec 473 sender [ 4] 0.00-5.00 sec 55.9 MBytes 93.7 Mbits/sec receiver iperf Done. root@bananapi:/etc/wireguard# As you can see there is Tx/Rx pretty much the same with around 94 Mbit/s (so the problem with my PC seems to be some issue with diffrent chipset compatibility or maybe frame-sizes MTU or similar problems... I hope to find the reson, but think it's this time the RK322x hardware. To my BananaPI there is not such a big diffrence between Rx/Tx). Anyway... I think these are the results you wanted to see. It's a wired messurement of the above setup messured to a wireguard tunnel: root@bananapi:/etc/wireguard# iperf3 -c 10.66.66.1 -i 1 -t 5 -P 1 Connecting to host 10.66.66.1, port 5201 [ 4] local 10.66.66.2 port 57468 connected to 10.66.66.1 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr Cwnd [ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 9.00 MBytes 75.5 Mbits/sec 26 24.0 KBytes [ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 9.35 MBytes 78.4 Mbits/sec 24 37.4 KBytes [ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 9.36 MBytes 78.5 Mbits/sec 20 44.1 KBytes [ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 9.61 MBytes 80.6 Mbits/sec 18 44.1 KBytes [ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 9.62 MBytes 80.6 Mbits/sec 21 42.8 KBytes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr [ 4] 0.00-5.00 sec 46.9 MBytes 78.7 Mbits/sec 109 sender [ 4] 0.00-5.00 sec 46.8 MBytes 78.4 Mbits/sec receiver iperf Done. root@bananapi:/etc/wireguard# iperf3 -c 10.66.66.1 -i 1 -t 5 -P 1 -R Connecting to host 10.66.66.1, port 5201 Reverse mode, remote host 10.66.66.1 is sending [ 4] local 10.66.66.2 port 57472 connected to 10.66.66.1 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 9.63 MBytes 80.6 Mbits/sec [ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 9.81 MBytes 82.3 Mbits/sec [ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 9.83 MBytes 82.3 Mbits/sec [ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 9.80 MBytes 82.3 Mbits/sec [ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 9.76 MBytes 81.9 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr [ 4] 0.00-5.00 sec 49.7 MBytes 83.4 Mbits/sec 5 sender [ 4] 0.00-5.00 sec 49.0 MBytes 82.1 Mbits/sec receiver iperf Done. You can see the device should at least reach the 80 Mbit/s with Tx/Rx. With the LOOP-Messurement... to be honest if I think longer about it, maybe the messurement isn't really routed through the wireguard-tunnel and it's just a maximum routing power of the device. If I use the diffrent IP-addresses outside the wireguard-tunnel like localhost or 192.168.178.x there is the same result. - So I guess it isn't really routed through a wireguard-tunnel-loop. If you shutdown the desktop environment the loop-test went up to around 830 Mbit/s Tx/Rx with this device. - Maybe we have some experts here to discuss it in a new topic. But anyway, I know this device is strong enough for most routing and vpn-scenarios if we adjust and optimize the drivers of eth0 and wlan0/p2p0. @jock: there is also an inteface called p2p0. If I use this instead of wlan0 the performance for my network is a bit better around 10%-20% better performance. - I don't know if that's already something like hardware-nat or similar, but wanna mention that. Maybe it's interesting for you to know. So Tx/Rx performance increse to around 45 Mbit/s to 50 Mbit/s via Wifi. Here is also the messurement from the rk322x-side: root@rk322x-box:/home/alex# iperf3 -c 10.66.66.1 -i 1 -t 5 -P 1 -R Connecting to host 10.66.66.1, port 5201 Reverse mode, remote host 10.66.66.1 is sending [ 5] local 10.66.66.1 port 45170 connected to 10.66.66.1 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 99.8 MBytes 837 Mbits/sec [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 98.6 MBytes 828 Mbits/sec [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 98.6 MBytes 827 Mbits/sec [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 98.2 MBytes 825 Mbits/sec [ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 98.2 MBytes 823 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr [ 5] 0.00-5.01 sec 494 MBytes 827 Mbits/sec 0 sender [ 5] 0.00-5.00 sec 494 MBytes 828 Mbits/sec receiver iperf Done. root@rk322x-box:/home/alex# iperf3 -c 10.66.66.1 -i 1 -t 5 -P 1 Connecting to host 10.66.66.1, port 5201 [ 5] local 10.66.66.1 port 45174 connected to 10.66.66.1 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 97.5 MBytes 815 Mbits/sec 0 639 KBytes [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 100 MBytes 839 Mbits/sec 0 1.12 MBytes [ 5] 2.00-3.01 sec 100 MBytes 837 Mbits/sec 0 1.12 MBytes [ 5] 3.01-4.01 sec 100 MBytes 834 Mbits/sec 0 1.12 MBytes [ 5] 4.01-5.01 sec 98.8 MBytes 835 Mbits/sec 0 1.12 MBytes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr [ 5] 0.00-5.01 sec 496 MBytes 832 Mbits/sec 0 sender [ 5] 0.00-5.01 sec 496 MBytes 831 Mbits/sec receiver iperf Done. root@rk322x-box:/home/alex# iperf3 -c 10.66.66.2 -i 1 -t 5 -P 1 Connecting to host 10.66.66.2, port 5201 [ 5] local 10.66.66.1 port 55284 connected to 10.66.66.2 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd [ 5] 0.00-1.01 sec 10.4 MBytes 87.0 Mbits/sec 3 94.9 KBytes [ 5] 1.01-2.00 sec 10.6 MBytes 89.3 Mbits/sec 0 155 KBytes [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 9.63 MBytes 80.9 Mbits/sec 1 138 KBytes [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 9.63 MBytes 80.8 Mbits/sec 1 127 KBytes [ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 9.75 MBytes 81.8 Mbits/sec 1 120 KBytes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr [ 5] 0.00-5.00 sec 50.0 MBytes 83.9 Mbits/sec 6 sender [ 5] 0.00-5.00 sec 49.5 MBytes 83.1 Mbits/sec receiver iperf Done. root@rk322x-box:/home/alex# iperf3 -c 10.66.66.2 -i 1 -t 5 -P 1 -R Connecting to host 10.66.66.2, port 5201 Reverse mode, remote host 10.66.66.2 is sending [ 5] local 10.66.66.1 port 55288 connected to 10.66.66.2 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 10.5 MBytes 88.3 Mbits/sec [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 9.03 MBytes 75.8 Mbits/sec [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 9.25 MBytes 77.6 Mbits/sec [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 9.38 MBytes 78.7 Mbits/sec [ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 9.57 MBytes 80.3 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr [ 5] 0.00-5.00 sec 47.9 MBytes 80.4 Mbits/sec 123 sender [ 5] 0.00-5.00 sec 47.8 MBytes 80.2 Mbits/sec receiver iperf Done. Update: Last update for today... I noticed "sudo reboot" or reboot in general doesn't work with my device. It just shuts down, but there is no reboot... As I said use the profile for "Scishion Mars" and it works quite good with ssv6051 wifi support.
  4. @jockI would love if we can use it as a jukebox or something similar. I mean it should already work with spotify premium or something. I think there are already some scripts and software for unix environments like debian, but as I said we need to priorise the sound that this is not lagging at least. - With my S912 (CSA93, 3GB RAM, 32GB ROM, 1GbE unfortunately with AP6212 non working wifi at least for me atm) i can also try to play HD-Videos. They are also laggy, but the sound is working. - I just can't tell you if it's just the HDMI-sound or also the 3,5mm jack and SPDIF-interface.... @fabiobassa: Here are my wifi-wireguard performance-messurement: root@rk322x-box:/etc/wireguard# iperf3 -c 10.66.66.2 -t 5 -i 1 -P4 Connecting to host 10.66.66.2, port 5201 [ 5] local 10.66.66.1 port 55028 connected to 10.66.66.2 port 5201 [ 7] local 10.66.66.1 port 55030 connected to 10.66.66.2 port 5201 [ 9] local 10.66.66.1 port 55032 connected to 10.66.66.2 port 5201 [ 11] local 10.66.66.1 port 55034 connected to 10.66.66.2 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.16 MBytes 9.71 Mbits/sec 1 64.1 KBytes [ 7] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.25 MBytes 10.5 Mbits/sec 0 98.9 KBytes [ 9] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.23 MBytes 10.3 Mbits/sec 1 64.1 KBytes [ 11] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.07 MBytes 8.94 Mbits/sec 1 74.8 KBytes [SUM] 0.00-1.00 sec 4.70 MBytes 39.4 Mbits/sec 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 879 KBytes 7.20 Mbits/sec 0 80.2 KBytes [ 7] 1.00-2.00 sec 942 KBytes 7.71 Mbits/sec 1 85.5 KBytes [ 9] 1.00-2.00 sec 753 KBytes 6.17 Mbits/sec 0 80.2 KBytes [ 11] 1.00-2.00 sec 1005 KBytes 8.23 Mbits/sec 1 81.5 KBytes [SUM] 1.00-2.00 sec 3.50 MBytes 29.3 Mbits/sec 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 1005 KBytes 8.23 Mbits/sec 1 65.5 KBytes [ 7] 2.00-3.00 sec 1005 KBytes 8.23 Mbits/sec 1 69.5 KBytes [ 9] 2.00-3.00 sec 954 KBytes 7.81 Mbits/sec 2 64.1 KBytes [ 11] 2.00-3.00 sec 879 KBytes 7.20 Mbits/sec 1 65.5 KBytes [SUM] 2.00-3.00 sec 3.75 MBytes 31.5 Mbits/sec 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 879 KBytes 7.20 Mbits/sec 0 74.8 KBytes [ 7] 3.00-4.00 sec 1.04 MBytes 8.74 Mbits/sec 1 54.8 KBytes [ 9] 3.00-4.00 sec 879 KBytes 7.20 Mbits/sec 0 73.5 KBytes [ 11] 3.00-4.00 sec 879 KBytes 7.20 Mbits/sec 0 74.8 KBytes [SUM] 3.00-4.00 sec 3.62 MBytes 30.3 Mbits/sec 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 879 KBytes 7.20 Mbits/sec 1 58.8 KBytes [ 7] 4.00-5.00 sec 628 KBytes 5.14 Mbits/sec 0 69.5 KBytes [ 9] 4.00-5.00 sec 942 KBytes 7.72 Mbits/sec 1 58.8 KBytes [ 11] 4.00-5.00 sec 1005 KBytes 8.23 Mbits/sec 0 84.2 KBytes [SUM] 4.00-5.00 sec 3.37 MBytes 28.3 Mbits/sec 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr [ 5] 0.00-5.00 sec 4.71 MBytes 7.91 Mbits/sec 3 sender [ 5] 0.00-5.00 sec 4.58 MBytes 7.69 Mbits/sec receiver [ 7] 0.00-5.00 sec 4.81 MBytes 8.07 Mbits/sec 3 sender [ 7] 0.00-5.00 sec 4.64 MBytes 7.79 Mbits/sec receiver [ 9] 0.00-5.00 sec 4.67 MBytes 7.84 Mbits/sec 4 sender [ 9] 0.00-5.00 sec 4.48 MBytes 7.52 Mbits/sec receiver [ 11] 0.00-5.00 sec 4.74 MBytes 7.96 Mbits/sec 3 sender [ 11] 0.00-5.00 sec 4.56 MBytes 7.65 Mbits/sec receiver [SUM] 0.00-5.00 sec 18.9 MBytes 31.8 Mbits/sec 13 sender [SUM] 0.00-5.00 sec 18.3 MBytes 30.7 Mbits/sec receiver iperf Done. root@rk322x-box:/etc/wireguard# iperf3 -c 10.66.66.2 -t 5 -i 1 -P4 -R Connecting to host 10.66.66.2, port 5201 Reverse mode, remote host 10.66.66.2 is sending [ 5] local 10.66.66.1 port 55038 connected to 10.66.66.2 port 5201 [ 7] local 10.66.66.1 port 55040 connected to 10.66.66.2 port 5201 [ 9] local 10.66.66.1 port 55042 connected to 10.66.66.2 port 5201 [ 11] local 10.66.66.1 port 55044 connected to 10.66.66.2 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.62 MBytes 13.6 Mbits/sec [ 7] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.05 MBytes 8.78 Mbits/sec [ 9] 0.00-1.00 sec 920 KBytes 7.54 Mbits/sec [ 11] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.08 MBytes 9.02 Mbits/sec [SUM] 0.00-1.00 sec 4.64 MBytes 39.0 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 1.32 MBytes 11.0 Mbits/sec [ 7] 1.00-2.00 sec 990 KBytes 8.11 Mbits/sec [ 9] 1.00-2.00 sec 779 KBytes 6.38 Mbits/sec [ 11] 1.00-2.00 sec 918 KBytes 7.52 Mbits/sec [SUM] 1.00-2.00 sec 3.94 MBytes 33.0 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 1.64 MBytes 13.7 Mbits/sec [ 7] 2.00-3.00 sec 1.37 MBytes 11.5 Mbits/sec [ 9] 2.00-3.00 sec 848 KBytes 6.95 Mbits/sec [ 11] 2.00-3.00 sec 1.08 MBytes 9.07 Mbits/sec [SUM] 2.00-3.00 sec 4.92 MBytes 41.3 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 1.12 MBytes 9.43 Mbits/sec [ 7] 3.00-4.00 sec 1.75 MBytes 14.7 Mbits/sec [ 9] 3.00-4.00 sec 840 KBytes 6.88 Mbits/sec [ 11] 3.00-4.00 sec 776 KBytes 6.36 Mbits/sec [SUM] 3.00-4.00 sec 4.46 MBytes 37.4 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 1017 KBytes 8.33 Mbits/sec [ 7] 4.00-5.00 sec 1.92 MBytes 16.1 Mbits/sec [ 9] 4.00-5.00 sec 842 KBytes 6.89 Mbits/sec [ 11] 4.00-5.00 sec 685 KBytes 5.61 Mbits/sec [SUM] 4.00-5.00 sec 4.40 MBytes 36.9 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr [ 5] 0.00-5.00 sec 7.43 MBytes 12.5 Mbits/sec 31 sender [ 5] 0.00-5.00 sec 6.70 MBytes 11.2 Mbits/sec receiver [ 7] 0.00-5.00 sec 7.78 MBytes 13.1 Mbits/sec 24 sender [ 7] 0.00-5.00 sec 7.05 MBytes 11.8 Mbits/sec receiver [ 9] 0.00-5.00 sec 4.48 MBytes 7.51 Mbits/sec 23 sender [ 9] 0.00-5.00 sec 4.13 MBytes 6.93 Mbits/sec receiver [ 11] 0.00-5.00 sec 4.97 MBytes 8.34 Mbits/sec 23 sender [ 11] 0.00-5.00 sec 4.48 MBytes 7.52 Mbits/sec receiver [SUM] 0.00-5.00 sec 24.7 MBytes 41.4 Mbits/sec 101 sender [SUM] 0.00-5.00 sec 22.4 MBytes 37.5 Mbits/sec receiver iperf Done. root@rk322x-box:/etc/wireguard# So as you see there is no diffrence to the messurement without wireguard and what I expected. - I mean the major thing is that we get something like Hardware-NAT like (SFE or NAT-Offloading in OpenWRT) to work with these devices, but even without that hardware-nat I expect from a machine with 4x1200 MHz something like 200 Mbit/s - 300 Mbit/s at least for wireguard! With the old TP-Link WR841 I got already around 40 Mbit/s via Ethernet from LAN<->WAN with a very slow (but very little power consumpting) 400 MHz Single-Core Atheros-Chipset. I will also do a messurement via cable if you want, but I don't expect less than the maximum speed of the ethernet port. If you have slow speed I actually expect your ISP slows it down. - Maybe change the ListenPort of your VPN. - I test everything just via INTRANET to minimize the outside trouble. I just use the wireguard interface IP's for the messurement and forces the traffic to get through it. Update: Here are the results from ethernetport-wireguard messurement: root@rk322x-box:~# iperf3 -c 10.66.66.1 -i 1 -t 5 -P 1 Connecting to host 10.66.66.1, port 5201 [ 5] local 10.66.66.1 port 45120 connected to 10.66.66.1 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 96.2 MBytes 805 Mbits/sec 0 1.25 MBytes [ 5] 1.00-2.01 sec 87.5 MBytes 730 Mbits/sec 0 1.25 MBytes [ 5] 2.01-3.00 sec 95.0 MBytes 801 Mbits/sec 0 1.25 MBytes [ 5] 3.00-4.01 sec 87.5 MBytes 731 Mbits/sec 0 1.25 MBytes [ 5] 4.01-5.00 sec 96.2 MBytes 812 Mbits/sec 0 1.25 MBytes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr [ 5] 0.00-5.00 sec 462 MBytes 776 Mbits/sec 0 sender [ 5] 0.00-5.00 sec 462 MBytes 776 Mbits/sec receiver iperf Done. root@rk322x-box:~# iperf3 -c 10.66.66.1 -i 1 -t 5 -P 1 -R Connecting to host 10.66.66.1, port 5201 Reverse mode, remote host 10.66.66.1 is sending [ 5] local 10.66.66.1 port 45124 connected to 10.66.66.1 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 90.0 MBytes 755 Mbits/sec [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 97.3 MBytes 816 Mbits/sec [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 89.2 MBytes 748 Mbits/sec [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 98.5 MBytes 826 Mbits/sec [ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 91.0 MBytes 763 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr [ 5] 0.00-5.00 sec 466 MBytes 782 Mbits/sec 0 sender [ 5] 0.00-5.00 sec 466 MBytes 782 Mbits/sec receiver iperf Done. root@rk322x-box:~# This is the result of a messurement of local-address through LAN. That means it's a loop and tests the maximum CPU-performance and as I expected the device is able to push and pull more than 500 Mbit/s. It's pretty much the same like my BananaPI with 1GbE interface is able to use even when the CPU there is slower as far as I remeber... Ok, but what's interesting for you and me: If I make some messurements to other machines in LAN the performance for the RX direction is a bit to weak: root@rk322x-box:~# iperf3 -c 10.66.66.2 -i 1 -t 5 -P 1 -R Connecting to host 10.66.66.2, port 5201 Reverse mode, remote host 10.66.66.2 is sending [ 5] local 10.66.66.1 port 55234 connected to 10.66.66.2 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 4.51 MBytes 37.8 Mbits/sec [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 4.41 MBytes 37.0 Mbits/sec [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 4.83 MBytes 40.5 Mbits/sec [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 5.06 MBytes 42.5 Mbits/sec [ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 4.62 MBytes 38.8 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr [ 5] 0.00-5.00 sec 27.0 MBytes 45.3 Mbits/sec 0 sender [ 5] 0.00-5.00 sec 23.4 MBytes 39.3 Mbits/sec receiver iperf Done. root@rk322x-box:~# iperf3 -c 10.66.66.2 -i 1 -t 5 -P 1 Connecting to host 10.66.66.2, port 5201 [ 5] local 10.66.66.1 port 55238 connected to 10.66.66.2 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 11.1 MBytes 92.9 Mbits/sec 2 132 KBytes [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 10.5 MBytes 87.9 Mbits/sec 1 152 KBytes [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 10.9 MBytes 91.0 Mbits/sec 2 126 KBytes [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 10.5 MBytes 88.0 Mbits/sec 1 142 KBytes [ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 10.9 MBytes 91.1 Mbits/sec 1 154 KBytes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr [ 5] 0.00-5.00 sec 53.8 MBytes 90.2 Mbits/sec 7 sender [ 5] 0.00-5.00 sec 53.3 MBytes 89.4 Mbits/sec receiver iperf Done. root@rk322x-box:~# it's just around the same like with wifi around 40 Mbit/s. BUT I noticed it's the same performance if I just use the real ip addresses without the wireguard-tunnel. - So the break is the Ethernet/IP Interface in general. root@rk322x-box:~# iperf3 -c 192.168.178.2 -i 1 -t 5 -P 1 -R Connecting to host 192.168.178.2, port 5201 Reverse mode, remote host 192.168.178.2 is sending [ 5] local 192.168.178.174 port 48678 connected to 192.168.178.2 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 4.43 MBytes 37.2 Mbits/sec [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 5.67 MBytes 47.6 Mbits/sec [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 5.02 MBytes 42.1 Mbits/sec [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 5.21 MBytes 43.7 Mbits/sec [ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 4.97 MBytes 41.7 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr [ 5] 0.00-5.00 sec 25.7 MBytes 43.1 Mbits/sec 0 sender [ 5] 0.00-5.00 sec 25.3 MBytes 42.4 Mbits/sec receiver iperf Done. root@rk322x-box:~# BUT if I use my Banana-PI (192.168.178.193) instead of my PC (192.168.178.2): root@rk322x-box:~# iperf3 -c 192.168.178.193 -i 1 -t 5 -P 1 -R Connecting to host 192.168.178.193, port 5201 Reverse mode, remote host 192.168.178.193 is sending [ 5] local 192.168.178.174 port 38722 connected to 192.168.178.193 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 11.2 MBytes 93.7 Mbits/sec [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 11.2 MBytes 94.1 Mbits/sec [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 11.2 MBytes 93.7 Mbits/sec [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 11.2 MBytes 94.2 Mbits/sec [ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 11.1 MBytes 93.6 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr [ 5] 0.00-5.00 sec 56.0 MBytes 94.0 Mbits/sec 442 sender [ 5] 0.00-5.00 sec 55.9 MBytes 93.8 Mbits/sec receiver iperf Done. root@rk322x-box:~# iperf3 -c 192.168.178.193 -i 1 -t 5 -P 1 Connecting to host 192.168.178.193, port 5201 [ 5] local 192.168.178.174 port 38726 connected to 192.168.178.193 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 11.6 MBytes 97.0 Mbits/sec 0 123 KBytes [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 11.2 MBytes 94.4 Mbits/sec 0 130 KBytes [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 11.2 MBytes 93.8 Mbits/sec 0 130 KBytes [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 11.2 MBytes 93.8 Mbits/sec 0 130 KBytes [ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 11.2 MBytes 94.3 Mbits/sec 0 130 KBytes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr [ 5] 0.00-5.00 sec 56.4 MBytes 94.7 Mbits/sec 0 sender [ 5] 0.00-5.00 sec 56.1 MBytes 94.1 Mbits/sec receiver iperf Done. root@rk322x-box:~# So I guess either it's some driver problem in Armbian or switch in my network and maybe that's the same issue for you if you have a very weak wireguard performance. - In my opinion for a wireguard server/client is this device already very powerfull! Btw... just if you are confused with the local-loop-test. Here is my local-loop of my PC: ubuntu-PC:/etc/wireguard$ iperf3 -c 10.66.66.2 -t 5 -i 1 -P 1 Connecting to host 10.66.66.2, port 5201 [ 4] local 10.66.66.2 port 41980 connected to 10.66.66.2 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr Cwnd [ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.79 GBytes 15.4 Gbits/sec 0 2.25 MBytes [ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 1.79 GBytes 15.4 Gbits/sec 0 2.69 MBytes [ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 1.98 GBytes 17.0 Gbits/sec 8 2.69 MBytes [ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 2.11 GBytes 18.1 Gbits/sec 0 2.69 MBytes [ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 1.95 GBytes 16.7 Gbits/sec 0 2.94 MBytes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr [ 4] 0.00-5.00 sec 9.61 GBytes 16.5 Gbits/sec 8 sender [ 4] 0.00-5.00 sec 9.60 GBytes 16.5 Gbits/sec receiver iperf Done. ubuntu-PC:/etc/wireguard$ iperf3 -c 10.66.66.2 -t 5 -i 1 -P 1 -R Connecting to host 10.66.66.2, port 5201 Reverse mode, remote host 10.66.66.2 is sending [ 4] local 10.66.66.2 port 41986 connected to 10.66.66.2 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.93 GBytes 16.6 Gbits/sec [ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 2.24 GBytes 19.2 Gbits/sec [ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 2.17 GBytes 18.6 Gbits/sec [ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 1.95 GBytes 16.7 Gbits/sec [ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 2.08 GBytes 17.8 Gbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr [ 4] 0.00-5.00 sec 10.4 GBytes 17.8 Gbits/sec 9 sender [ 4] 0.00-5.00 sec 10.4 GBytes 17.8 Gbits/sec receiver iperf Done. So as you see a PC is still a bit more powerfull, but I think these devices are powerfull enough for that purpose. Tbh. I thought maybe about a wireless-network-speaker-device-purpose for these boxes. - I think it could also be very interesting to use it as a network-sound-output device to diffrent speakers in your smart-home.
  5. _ _________ ____ _ _ __| | _|___ /___ \|___ \__ __ | |__ _____ __ | '__| |/ / |_ \ __) | __) \ \/ /____| '_ \ / _ \ \/ / | | | < ___) / __/ / __/ > <_____| |_) | (_) > < |_| |_|\_\____/_____|_____/_/\_\ |_.__/ \___/_/\_\ Welcome to Armbian Focal with Linux 4.4.194-rk322x No end-user support: built from trunk System load: 5.36 5.08 4.99 Up time: 1:02 Memory usage: 24 % of 979MB IP: CPU temp: 59°C Usage of /: 27% of 6.9G Last login: Sun May 3 11:56:04 2020 from 192.168.178.178 root@rk322x-box:~# hexdump -C /sys/bus/nvmem/devices/rockch p-efuse0/nvmem 00000000 52 4b 23 92 81 f0 70 55 52 4b 50 30 35 30 31 36 |RK#...pURKP05016| 00000010 00 00 00 00 08 05 1f 04 00 03 01 00 00 80 00 00 |................| 00000020 root@rk322x-box:~# root@rk322x-box:~# iperf3 -c 192.168.178.193 -i 1 -t 5 -P 4 -R Connecting to host 192.168.178.193, port 5201 Reverse mode, remote host 192.168.178.193 is sending [ 5] local 192.168.178.192 port 52158 connected to 192.168 178.193 port 5201 [ 7] local 192.168.178.192 port 52160 connected to 192.168 178.193 port 5201 [ 9] local 192.168.178.192 port 52162 connected to 192.168 178.193 port 5201 [ 11] local 192.168.178.192 port 52164 connected to 192.168 178.193 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.57 MBytes 13.2 Mbits/sec [ 7] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.06 MBytes 8.90 Mbits/sec [ 9] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.10 MBytes 9.27 Mbits/sec [ 11] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.08 MBytes 9.08 Mbits/sec [SUM] 0.00-1.00 sec 4.82 MBytes 40.4 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 1.75 MBytes 14.7 Mbits/sec [ 7] 1.00-2.00 sec 1.08 MBytes 9.06 Mbits/sec [ 9] 1.00-2.00 sec 1.14 MBytes 9.52 Mbits/sec [ 11] 1.00-2.00 sec 1.11 MBytes 9.33 Mbits/sec [SUM] 1.00-2.00 sec 5.08 MBytes 42.6 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 1.43 MBytes 12.0 Mbits/sec [ 7] 2.00-3.00 sec 1.04 MBytes 8.72 Mbits/sec [ 9] 2.00-3.00 sec 1.67 MBytes 14.0 Mbits/sec [ 11] 2.00-3.00 sec 1012 KBytes 8.29 Mbits/sec [SUM] 2.00-3.00 sec 5.13 MBytes 43.0 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 1.22 MBytes 10.2 Mbits/sec [ 7] 3.00-4.00 sec 897 KBytes 7.35 Mbits/sec [ 9] 3.00-4.00 sec 1.61 MBytes 13.5 Mbits/sec [ 11] 3.00-4.00 sec 1018 KBytes 8.34 Mbits/sec [SUM] 3.00-4.00 sec 4.69 MBytes 39.4 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 1.38 MBytes 11.5 Mbits/sec [ 7] 4.00-5.00 sec 946 KBytes 7.75 Mbits/sec [ 9] 4.00-5.00 sec 1.81 MBytes 15.2 Mbits/sec [ 11] 4.00-5.00 sec 957 KBytes 7.84 Mbits/sec [SUM] 4.00-5.00 sec 5.05 MBytes 42.3 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr [ 5] 0.00-5.00 sec 8.14 MBytes 13.7 Mbits/sec 7 sender [ 5] 0.00-5.00 sec 7.34 MBytes 12.3 Mbits/sec receiver [ 7] 0.00-5.00 sec 5.47 MBytes 9.17 Mbits/sec 7 sender [ 7] 0.00-5.00 sec 4.98 MBytes 8.35 Mbits/sec receiver [ 9] 0.00-5.00 sec 8.14 MBytes 13.7 Mbits/sec 14 sender [ 9] 0.00-5.00 sec 7.33 MBytes 12.3 Mbits/sec receiver [ 11] 0.00-5.00 sec 5.62 MBytes 9.43 Mbits/sec 13 sender [ 11] 0.00-5.00 sec 5.11 MBytes 8.58 Mbits/sec receiver [SUM] 0.00-5.00 sec 27.4 MBytes 45.9 Mbits/sec 41 sender [SUM] 0.00-5.00 sec 24.8 MBytes 41.5 Mbits/sec receiver iperf Done. root@rk322x-box:~# root@rk322x-box:~# iperf3 -c 192.168.178.193 -i 1 -t 5 -P 4 Connecting to host 192.168.178.193, port 5201 [ 5] local 192.168.178.192 port 52168 connected to 192.168 178.193 port 5201 [ 7] local 192.168.178.192 port 52170 connected to 192.168 178.193 port 5201 [ 9] local 192.168.178.192 port 52172 connected to 192.168 178.193 port 5201 [ 11] local 192.168.178.192 port 52174 connected to 192.168 178.193 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.06 MBytes 8.85 Mbits/sec 1 42.4 KBytes [ 7] 0.00-1.00 sec 494 KBytes 4.04 Mbits/sec 0 28.3 KBytes [ 9] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.53 MBytes 12.8 Mbits/sec 0 60.8 KBytes [ 11] 0.00-1.00 sec 568 KBytes 4.66 Mbits/sec 0 31.1 KBytes [SUM] 0.00-1.00 sec 3.62 MBytes 30.4 Mbits/sec 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 1.00 MBytes 8.40 Mbits/sec 0 42.4 KBytes [ 7] 1.00-2.00 sec 587 KBytes 4.81 Mbits/sec 0 28.3 KBytes [ 9] 1.00-2.00 sec 1.38 MBytes 11.5 Mbits/sec 1 60.8 KBytes [ 11] 1.00-2.00 sec 358 KBytes 2.93 Mbits/sec 0 31.1 KBytes [SUM] 1.00-2.00 sec 3.30 MBytes 27.7 Mbits/sec 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 959 KBytes 7.85 Mbits/sec 0 42.4 KBytes [ 7] 2.00-3.00 sec 419 KBytes 3.43 Mbits/sec 0 28.3 KBytes [ 9] 2.00-3.00 sec 1.26 MBytes 10.6 Mbits/sec 0 60.8 KBytes [ 11] 2.00-3.00 sec 522 KBytes 4.27 Mbits/sec 0 31.1 KBytes [SUM] 2.00-3.00 sec 3.12 MBytes 26.2 Mbits/sec 0 192.168.178.192 is the Rk3229 device and 192.168.178.193 my Gigabit Iperf3 server. As I mentioned with Ethernet it's around 90-95 Mbit/s up and down. root@rk322x-box:~# iperf3 -c 192.168.178.193 -i 1 -t 5 -P 1 Connecting to host 192.168.178.193, port 5201 [ 5] local 192.168.178.192 port 52178 connected to 192.168 178.193 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 2.53 MBytes 21.2 Mbits/sec 1 32.5 KBytes [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 2.29 MBytes 19.2 Mbits/sec 0 32.5 KBytes [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 2.30 MBytes 19.3 Mbits/sec 0 32.5 KBytes [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 2.23 MBytes 18.7 Mbits/sec 0 32.5 KBytes [ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 2.48 MBytes 20.8 Mbits/sec 0 32.5 KBytes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr [ 5] 0.00-5.00 sec 11.8 MBytes 19.8 Mbits/sec 1 sender [ 5] 0.00-5.00 sec 11.8 MBytes 19.8 Mbits/sec receiver iperf Done. root@rk322x-box:~# iperf3 -c 192.168.178.193 -i 1 -t 5 -P 1 -R Connecting to host 192.168.178.193, port 5201 Reverse mode, remote host 192.168.178.193 is sending [ 5] local 192.168.178.192 port 52182 connected to 192.168 178.193 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 3.66 MBytes 30.7 Mbits/sec [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 3.80 MBytes 31.8 Mbits/sec [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 5.03 MBytes 42.2 Mbits/sec [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 5.00 MBytes 41.9 Mbits/sec [ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 5.10 MBytes 42.8 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr [ 5] 0.00-5.00 sec 24.5 MBytes 41.0 Mbits/sec 40 sender [ 5] 0.00-5.00 sec 22.6 MBytes 37.9 Mbits/sec receiver iperf Done. root@rk322x-box:~#
  6. Thanks for your comments! I can provide you later the informations of your comments if it helps. I flashed now your newest Ubuntu Desktop image and used the profile Rk3229 Mars Profile. This actually worked out and I can also use wifi with the ssv6051 chipset. Beside my FritzBox I can reach 72 Mbit/s and I think that's the maximum with this 1x1 hardware. Iperf3 measurement to my Gigabit Iperf3 Server showed up with a maximum Rx Rate around 35-40 Mbit/s and Tx of around 15-20 Mbit/s. With the 100 Mbit/s Ethernet I can reach around 90-95 Rx and TX. Unfortunately the sound is lagging and crackling if I try to play radio from a web page or YouTube. - So I still don't see a useful browser desktop scenario with the device... But I'm quite happy for now and will start trying to test wireguard performance soon. The major problem with the former image disappeared now of course and didn't show up even after the newest apt update && apt upgrade. So far my highest respect and thank you for your great development steps you did already with this little bitchy rk3229 devices... For me it feels at this stage about the same performance as the rpi 1 b I used before. The rpi 2 still performs a bit more smooth, even when already all 4 cores of the rk3229 work at 1200 MHz on this device.
  7. Did you use the remote control in multitool oder used an extenal USB-Keyboard? It just works to select with external keyboard. So do you see the GPL or does the screen go black?
  8. @fabiobassa: Indeed it is an RK3229 device with 1GB/8GB and NAND-Storage with SSV6051 wireless chipset. Unfortunately since the last apt update && apt upgrade there is a new problem: root@rk322x-v88-mini ~ > sudo apt autoremove Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig Abh�ngigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut. Statusinformationen werden eingelesen.... Fertig 0 aktualisiert, 0 neu installiert, 0 zu entfernen und 0 nicht aktualisiert. 2 nicht vollst�ndig installiert oder entfernt. Nach dieser Operation werden 0 B Plattenplatz zus�tzlich benutzt. console-data (2:1.12-8) wird eingerichtet ... Use of uninitialized value $_[1] in join or string at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 121, <STDIN> line 18. Looking for keymap to install: console-data/keymap/full doesn't exist Benutzung: install-keymap [ Keymap_Datei | NONE | KERNEL ] dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten des Paketes console-data (--configure): �installiertes console-data-Skript des Paketes post-installation�-Unterprozess gab den Fehlerwert 1 zur�ck dpkg: Abh�ngigkeitsprobleme verhindern Konfiguration von console-common: console-common h�ngt ab von console-data; aber: Paket console-data ist noch nicht konfiguriert. dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten des Paketes console-common (--configure): Abh�ngigkeitsprobleme - verbleibt unkonfiguriert Fehler traten auf beim Bearbeiten von: console-data console-common
  9. I have a ssv6051p chipset This is exactly my device So, now I tried the following profiles which don't bring up the device again: rk3229-box-a95xr1 rk3229-box-v884k rk3229-box-hk1mini The only profile which worked out (but without wifi) is rk322x-box (Generic RK322x TV Box board) and now I am a bit bored of waitng after new NAND-flashing after each failure and I guess the NAND-flash doesn't like to get programmed so often before it finally breaks at some point. I also thought about to try Android 8.1 from the link in my post, but would love to get both working Android 8.1 and Armbian. My device has 1GB RAM / 8GB ROM. Maybe the "...mxq-..." profiles could work or the "...modelx", but I am slowly a bit scared about new flashings.
  10. Hey, I got the same message: root@rk322x-box:~# cat "/sys/bus/mmc/devices/mmc1:0001/mmc1:0001:1/modalias" cat: '/sys/bus/mmc/devices/mmc1:0001/mmc1:0001:1/modalias': No such file or directory Actually I tried to adapt the Device-tree with: sudo rk322x-config and tried v884k box since I have a V88mini4k. The device hasn't boot again. So I reflashed to NAND again the legacy-kernel-Ubuntu-image. Any ideas if it's the rk322x-box profile or the rk3229-scishion-modelx? Can you provide some summary which profile is used for which chipset? - With my box the wifi didn't work at the first boot. There is a wifi-symbol in the corner, but it does not find any wifi-networks there. UPDATE: I used now the rk322x-box (generic profile) and the desktop environment bootet again. Playing an H264-1080p file was lagging like the GPU-accellerating is not working. - So I guess either with the profile a problem or in general with the GPU-accelleration. In the first post it said GPU accelleration is working with leagacy-kernel 4.xx So any ideas how I get wifi/bluetooth and GPU-accelleration working?
  11. Great work! @fabiobassa @Maker39 and @jock biggest thanks on earth for the development and that you still hang on finding solutions for NAND boards! Please keep on developing and I think the boards are better choices than raspberry pi's... How is the performance with your images and do we really get gpu acceleration for videos? Is it working with h265 too?
  12. Edit: I made a Iperf3 test. Unfortunately there is just a performance of 100Mbit/s interface, not of 1000 Mbit/s <code> Connecting to host 192.168.178.169, port 5201 Reverse mode, remote host 192.168.178.169 is sending [ 4] local 192.168.178.189 port 39424 connected to 192.168.178.169 port 5201 [ 6] local 192.168.178.189 port 39425 connected to 192.168.178.169 port 5201 [ 8] local 192.168.178.189 port 39426 connected to 192.168.178.169 port 5201 [ 10] local 192.168.178.189 port 39427 connected to 192.168.178.169 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.80 MBytes 15.1 Mbits/sec [ 6] 0.00-1.00 sec 3.04 MBytes 25.4 Mbits/sec [ 8] 0.00-1.00 sec 3.07 MBytes 25.7 Mbits/sec [ 10] 0.00-1.00 sec 3.10 MBytes 26.0 Mbits/sec [SUM] 0.00-1.00 sec 11.0 MBytes 92.2 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 1.85 MBytes 15.5 Mbits/sec [ 6] 1.00-2.00 sec 3.03 MBytes 25.5 Mbits/sec [ 8] 1.00-2.00 sec 3.17 MBytes 26.6 Mbits/sec [ 10] 1.00-2.00 sec 3.07 MBytes 25.8 Mbits/sec [SUM] 1.00-2.00 sec 11.1 MBytes 93.3 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 1.69 MBytes 14.2 Mbits/sec [ 6] 2.00-3.00 sec 2.99 MBytes 25.0 Mbits/sec [ 8] 2.00-3.00 sec 3.33 MBytes 27.9 Mbits/sec [ 10] 2.00-3.00 sec 3.09 MBytes 25.9 Mbits/sec [SUM] 2.00-3.00 sec 11.1 MBytes 93.1 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 1.76 MBytes 14.8 Mbits/sec [ 6] 3.00-4.00 sec 3.08 MBytes 25.8 Mbits/sec [ 8] 3.00-4.00 sec 3.20 MBytes 26.8 Mbits/sec [ 10] 3.00-4.00 sec 3.04 MBytes 25.4 Mbits/sec [SUM] 3.00-4.00 sec 11.1 MBytes 92.9 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 1.75 MBytes 14.7 Mbits/sec [ 6] 4.00-5.00 sec 3.08 MBytes 25.8 Mbits/sec [ 8] 4.00-5.00 sec 3.12 MBytes 26.2 Mbits/sec [ 10] 4.00-5.00 sec 3.15 MBytes 26.4 Mbits/sec [SUM] 4.00-5.00 sec 11.1 MBytes 93.2 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 1.85 MBytes 15.5 Mbits/sec [ 6] 5.00-6.00 sec 3.20 MBytes 26.8 Mbits/sec [ 8] 5.00-6.00 sec 2.99 MBytes 25.1 Mbits/sec [ 10] 5.00-6.00 sec 2.86 MBytes 24.0 Mbits/sec [SUM] 5.00-6.00 sec 10.9 MBytes 91.4 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 2.06 MBytes 17.3 Mbits/sec [ 6] 6.00-7.00 sec 3.67 MBytes 30.8 Mbits/sec [ 8] 6.00-7.00 sec 2.68 MBytes 22.5 Mbits/sec [ 10] 6.00-7.00 sec 2.69 MBytes 22.5 Mbits/sec [SUM] 6.00-7.00 sec 11.1 MBytes 93.1 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 2.10 MBytes 17.6 Mbits/sec [ 6] 7.00-8.00 sec 3.67 MBytes 30.7 Mbits/sec [ 8] 7.00-8.00 sec 2.67 MBytes 22.3 Mbits/sec [ 10] 7.00-8.00 sec 2.67 MBytes 22.4 Mbits/sec [SUM] 7.00-8.00 sec 11.1 MBytes 93.1 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 2.18 MBytes 18.3 Mbits/sec [ 6] 8.00-9.00 sec 3.57 MBytes 29.9 Mbits/sec [ 8] 8.00-9.00 sec 2.67 MBytes 22.4 Mbits/sec [ 10] 8.00-9.00 sec 2.68 MBytes 22.5 Mbits/sec [SUM] 8.00-9.00 sec 11.1 MBytes 93.0 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 2.37 MBytes 19.9 Mbits/sec [ 6] 9.00-10.00 sec 3.25 MBytes 27.2 Mbits/sec [ 8] 9.00-10.00 sec 2.68 MBytes 22.5 Mbits/sec [ 10] 9.00-10.00 sec 2.78 MBytes 23.3 Mbits/sec [SUM] 9.00-10.00 sec 11.1 MBytes 92.9 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 19.7 MBytes 16.6 Mbits/sec 0 sender [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 19.4 MBytes 16.3 Mbits/sec receiver [ 6] 0.00-10.00 sec 33.2 MBytes 27.8 Mbits/sec 0 sender [ 6] 0.00-10.00 sec 32.7 MBytes 27.4 Mbits/sec receiver [ 8] 0.00-10.00 sec 30.0 MBytes 25.2 Mbits/sec 0 sender [ 8] 0.00-10.00 sec 29.6 MBytes 24.8 Mbits/sec receiver [ 10] 0.00-10.00 sec 29.6 MBytes 24.8 Mbits/sec 0 sender [ 10] 0.00-10.00 sec 29.1 MBytes 24.4 Mbits/sec receiver [SUM] 0.00-10.00 sec 112 MBytes 94.3 Mbits/sec 0 sender [SUM] 0.00-10.00 sec 111 MBytes 92.9 Mbits/sec receiver iperf Done. </code>
  13. I deleted the allwinner and rockchip folders, but after another apt upgrade it's the same error (no space left).
  14. what should I do with the full root partition with 256MB ITS WITH EVERY CHANGE OF KERNEL OR BOOT OPTIONS AN ERROR MESSAGE FOR BOOT PARTITION (NO SPACE LEFT)
  15. @balbes150 Thank you for your unique great work! I think also it's a great idea to unify the images and just to replace in uEnv.ini the dtb filename to the correct ones! I used the file Armbian_19.11.5_Aml-g12_bionic_dev_5.5.0-rc4_20191228.img.xz for using it on my CSA93 S912 Amlogic device with 3GB DDR3 and 32GB ROM. The Chipset for Ethernet works! I used aml_autoscript in Android-Update-Firmware-Manually then it just started till the Tiger S912 Logo and hung. After replacing in uEnv.ini the FIRST line to: "dtb_name=/dtb/amlogic/meson-gxm-q200.dtb" then it booted! It seems like meson-gxm-q200.dtb works for S912 devices with 1000 Mbit/s interfaces. Here is my dmesg: So the driver for RTL8211F Gigabit Ethernet works on 100 Mbit/s and 1Gbe/s nearly perfect! I did an iperf3 messurement from PC and Banana PI. From BananaPI the performance was ~800 Mbit/s RX/TX and with my PC the CSA93 performed to 950 Mbit/s RX/TX. Problems: - No sound - No Wifi. I guess it's the problem of ath10k, but thought it's already officially implemented in the newer builds (I have a Qualcomm QCA9377 in my box) - Boot partition is formated to FAT16 and just 256 MB. I can't resize with another system because it says it has to change into FAT32 then and maybe the bootloader doesn't like that. - Reason for this is, that I wanna use wireguard and when it comes to installation it says no space left on boot partition. Actually there is no space left of the 256 MB and it seems to be impossible to extend the size without damaging the fs. Would love if you have some hints how to proceed!