kometchtech

Hello Igor, In past threads, it seems a bit argued about the zram module, but will not the zram module be enabled by default on other arm boards? I am using odroid-c2, but it is effective in hardkernel? It seems that it is becoming. If possible, if Armbian seems to have no problem, I want it to be valid. https://forum.odroid.com/viewtopic.php?f=136&t=20116 $ grep "ZRAM" /boot/config-3.14.79-odroidc2 CONFIG_ZRAM=y # CONFIG_ZRAM_LZ4_COMPRESS is not set # CONFIG_ZRAM_DEBUG is not set $ lsmod | grep zram $ cat /etc/armbian-release # PLEASE DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE BOARD=odroidc2 BOARD_NAME="Odroid C2" VERSION=5.31 LINUXFAMILY=odroidc2 BRANCH=default ARCH=arm64 IMAGE_TYPE=stable Best regards.

Hi, All ARM 64 get support plate. http://www.banana-pi.org/m64.html Spec: If it is like the 3.10 series kernel,?!?

So do not arm64 in the following source is apparently not compile. Do you have a solution? https://github.com/friendlyarm/linux-3.4.y

Thanks,@wildcat_paris Shown below, seems to not compile. # CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- ARCH=arm64 make clean defconfig Makefile:568: /home/linux-3.4.y/arch/arm64/Makefile: No such file or directory make[1]: *** No rule to make target `/home/linux-3.4.y/arch/arm64/Makefile'. Stop. make: *** [clean] Error 2

@wildcat_paris I do not know how to aarch64 because the official Git doesn't work like that. The Forum is not working actively. edit:https://github.com/friendlyarm/

@wildcat_paris Thanks for the Info! Or better still you recompiled in aarch64... Only official, there is that way.

FYI tkaiser uname -a Linux dns02.kometch.local 3.4.39-s5p6818 #2 SMP PREEMPT Fri May 20 15:51:46 HKT 2016 armv7l GNU/Linux cat /proc/version Linux version 3.4.39-s5p6818 (root@jensen) (gcc version 4.9.3 (ctng-1.21.0-229g-FA) ) #2 SMP PREEMPT Fri May 20 15:51:46 HKT 2016

FYI. NanoPC-T3 result. time sysbench --test=cpu --cpu-max-prime=20000 --num-threads=8 run sysbench 0.4.12: multi-threaded system evaluation benchmark Running the test with following options: Number of threads: 8 Doing CPU performance benchmark Threads started! Done. Maximum prime number checked in CPU test: 20000 Test execution summary: total time: 57.1916s total number of events: 10000 total time taken by event execution: 457.3030 per-request statistics: min: 45.43ms avg: 45.73ms max: 166.89ms approx. 95 percentile: 45.73ms Threads fairness: events (avg/stddev): 1250.0000/1.00 execution time (avg/stddev): 57.1629/0.01 real 0m57.223s user 7m36.520s sys 0m0.068s

Hi all. In response to aarch64 because the images have been distributed to the official NanoPC-T3 and NanoPC-M3 arm7l and Armbian you want to distribute. From the official not working so actively hard? http://wiki.friendlyarm.com/wiki/index.php/NanoPC-T3 https://github.com/friendlyarm/ Thanks.

NanoPC-T3 heatsink with photo uploads. Parameter to that I was reading about the temperature, it is not.

I bought the same system configuration NanoPC-T3. Image has been distributed from the FriendlyARM and is distributed in the form of arm7l, in the form of aarch64 is like. And would convey expectations to the other side, but will support the Armbian!

@tkaisar It was situation understanding. We decided to wait until the branch of the problem is resolved.

Octacore "voluntary design (ARM64) you can buy cheaper, so personally hoping for Armbian.

@tkaiser Bananapi M3 Armbian images are not public? I think the source.list contain Banana pi m2plus Armbian I debian-lite image has the Armbian based on published in banana pi Forum, but because poor conditions.

The version of the past? So were working. Would do should wait until it is fixed.