kometchtech

Members
  • Content Count

    48
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About kometchtech

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Recent Profile Visitors

726 profile views
  1. Hello Igor, In past threads, it seems a bit argued about the zram module, but will not the zram module be enabled by default on other arm boards? I am using odroid-c2, but it is effective in hardkernel? It seems that it is becoming. If possible, if Armbian seems to have no problem, I want it to be valid. https://forum.odroid.com/viewtopic.php?f=136&t=20116 $ grep "ZRAM" /boot/config-3.14.79-odroidc2 CONFIG_ZRAM=y # CONFIG_ZRAM_LZ4_COMPRESS is not set # CONFIG_ZRAM_DEBUG is not set $ lsmod | grep zram $ cat /etc/armbian-release # PLEASE DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE BOARD=odroidc2 BOARD_NAME="Odroid C2" VERSION=5.31 LINUXFAMILY=odroidc2 BRANCH=default ARCH=arm64 IMAGE_TYPE=stable Best regards.
  2. in the mainline kernel, and I get the data in power from the GPIO. The output of the power supply adapter is 5V/3A is written. kometch@pine64:~$ iperf3 -c 192.168.122.223 Connecting to host 192.168.122.223, port 5201 [ 4] local 192.168.122.176 port 38366 connected to 192.168.122.223 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr Cwnd [ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 57.6 MBytes 483 Mbits/sec 17 253 KBytes [ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 56.2 MBytes 471 Mbits/sec 127 253 KBytes [ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 55.9 MBytes 469 Mbits/sec 129 247 KBytes [ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 55.8 MBytes 468 Mbits/sec 194 180 KBytes [ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 56.2 MBytes 471 Mbits/sec 183 167 KBytes [ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 56.4 MBytes 473 Mbits/sec 0 256 KBytes [ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 56.4 MBytes 473 Mbits/sec 165 236 KBytes [ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 55.7 MBytes 468 Mbits/sec 208 180 KBytes [ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 55.7 MBytes 467 Mbits/sec 80 181 KBytes [ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 56.8 MBytes 476 Mbits/sec 0 256 KBytes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 563 MBytes 472 Mbits/sec 1103 sender [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 561 MBytes 471 Mbits/sec receiver iperf Done.
  3. @zador.blood.stained This data is the result of running with microUSB powered by mainline kernel. @tkaiser Because I do not own a multi-meter, it will not be able to measure the data.
  4. @tkaiser As far as I tried measured in iperf it seems out speed. However, perhaps because of Packet loss, it takes a very time situation to apt-get update. kometch@pine64:~$ iperf3 -c 192.168.122.223 Connecting to host 192.168.122.223, port 5201 [ 4] local 192.168.122.171 port 42206 connected to 192.168.122.223 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr Cwnd [ 4] 0.00-1.01 sec 46.6 MBytes 386 Mbits/sec 130 215 KBytes [ 4] 1.01-2.00 sec 34.7 MBytes 295 Mbits/sec 70 90.5 KBytes [ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 45.6 MBytes 382 Mbits/sec 10 173 KBytes [ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 55.9 MBytes 468 Mbits/sec 94 164 KBytes [ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 56.0 MBytes 470 Mbits/sec 120 191 KBytes [ 4] 5.00-6.01 sec 57.7 MBytes 480 Mbits/sec 55 245 KBytes [ 4] 6.01-7.00 sec 45.0 MBytes 381 Mbits/sec 59 141 KBytes [ 4] 7.00-8.01 sec 45.4 MBytes 377 Mbits/sec 17 178 KBytes [ 4] 8.01-9.02 sec 53.9 MBytes 447 Mbits/sec 120 133 KBytes [ 4] 9.02-10.00 sec 56.5 MBytes 484 Mbits/sec 38 198 KBytes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 497 MBytes 417 Mbits/sec 713 sender [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 496 MBytes 416 Mbits/sec receiver iperf Done.
  5. Hi, All ARM 64 get support plate. http://www.banana-pi.org/m64.html Spec: If it is like the 3.10 series kernel,?!?
  6. So do not arm64 in the following source is apparently not compile. Do you have a solution? https://github.com/friendlyarm/linux-3.4.y
  7. Thanks,@wildcat_paris Shown below, seems to not compile. # CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- ARCH=arm64 make clean defconfig Makefile:568: /home/linux-3.4.y/arch/arm64/Makefile: No such file or directory make[1]: *** No rule to make target `/home/linux-3.4.y/arch/arm64/Makefile'. Stop. make: *** [clean] Error 2
  8. @wildcat_paris I do not know how to aarch64 because the official Git doesn't work like that. The Forum is not working actively. edit:https://github.com/friendlyarm/
  9. @wildcat_paris Thanks for the Info! Or better still you recompiled in aarch64... Only official, there is that way.
  10. FYI tkaiser uname -a Linux dns02.kometch.local 3.4.39-s5p6818 #2 SMP PREEMPT Fri May 20 15:51:46 HKT 2016 armv7l GNU/Linux cat /proc/version Linux version 3.4.39-s5p6818 (root@jensen) (gcc version 4.9.3 (ctng-1.21.0-229g-FA) ) #2 SMP PREEMPT Fri May 20 15:51:46 HKT 2016
  11. FYI. NanoPC-T3 result. time sysbench --test=cpu --cpu-max-prime=20000 --num-threads=8 run sysbench 0.4.12: multi-threaded system evaluation benchmark Running the test with following options: Number of threads: 8 Doing CPU performance benchmark Threads started! Done. Maximum prime number checked in CPU test: 20000 Test execution summary: total time: 57.1916s total number of events: 10000 total time taken by event execution: 457.3030 per-request statistics: min: 45.43ms avg: 45.73ms max: 166.89ms approx. 95 percentile: 45.73ms Threads fairness: events (avg/stddev): 1250.0000/1.00 execution time (avg/stddev): 57.1629/0.01 real 0m57.223s user 7m36.520s sys 0m0.068s
  12. Hi all. In response to aarch64 because the images have been distributed to the official NanoPC-T3 and NanoPC-M3 arm7l and Armbian you want to distribute. From the official not working so actively hard? http://wiki.friendlyarm.com/wiki/index.php/NanoPC-T3 https://github.com/friendlyarm/ Thanks.
  13. NanoPC-T3 heatsink with photo uploads. Parameter to that I was reading about the temperature, it is not.
  14. I bought the same system configuration NanoPC-T3. Image has been distributed from the FriendlyARM and is distributed in the form of arm7l, in the form of aarch64 is like. And would convey expectations to the other side, but will support the Armbian!
  15. @tkaisar It was situation understanding. We decided to wait until the branch of the problem is resolved.