amazingfate

If you are talking about lag with discord webpage, vpu accel won't help because there is no video played in discord. You can check chromium's gpu status at chrome://gpu, see if the gpu driver is working. My ppa only packages chromium for noble, ubuntu 25.04 is not supported. While chromium in my ppa only add patches to let chromium use vpu when playing videos, this should not help improving discord webpage performance.

Hi, There are differences between the bookworm and noble images: - bookworm is running vendor 6.1.99 kernel which is from rockchip's sdk, while noble is running mainline 6.12.13. The SDK kernel may have issues detecting screen resolution, you may wait for a new version 6.1.115 to see if the issue is fixed. - bookworm should be running without gpu driver, you can check it by command "dpkg -l|grep libgl1-mesa-dri", if the version is lower than 24.1, the gpu is not drived, you can try bookworm image built with mesa-vpu extension for example the cinnamon one: https://dl.armbian.com/bananapim7/Bookworm_current_cinnamon-backported-mesa - You are running both images with xfce desktop, so the scaling issue may be desktop environment related, usually wayland session(such as gnome wayland) has better support on HiDPI screens.

I have created a fix pr: https://github.com/radxa-pkg/aic8800/pull/27 You can download debs from workflow artifacts: https://github.com/radxa-pkg/aic8800/actions/runs/13725535037

Please try this fix: https://github.com/armbian/linux-rockchip/pull/328

This commit should be in the source tree if you are using the latest code. I have no idea why the issue happens again. I will check it later.

This is a dkms related issue when BTF is enable. This commit should have fixed it: https://github.com/armbian/linux-rockchip/commit/7294c3d056ca52ba312f1b7cdc5cd2273f7d9766

After 20min of fio test, nvme disk is still fine $ sudo fio --name=randwrite --ioengine=sync --rw=write --bs=4k --numjobs=1 --size=1G --runtime=1200s --time_based --directory=/mnt [sudo] password for jfliu: randwrite: (g=0): rw=write, bs=(R) 4096B-4096B, (W) 4096B-4096B, (T) 4096B-4096B, ioengine=sync, iodepth=1 fio-3.36 Starting 1 process Jobs: 1 (f=1): [W(1)][93.4%][w=93.4MiB/s][w=23.9k IOPS][eta 01m:19s] Jobs: 1 (f=1): [W(1)][100.0%][eta 00m:00s] randwrite: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=5569: Wed Dec 11 10:26:57 2024 write: IOPS=49.7k, BW=194MiB/s (203MB/s)(227GiB/1200478msec); 0 zone resets clat (nsec): min=1166, max=3770.1M, avg=18646.17, stdev=2441229.11 lat (nsec): min=1458, max=3770.1M, avg=18735.33, stdev=2441230.02 clat percentiles (nsec): | 1.00th=[ 1464], 5.00th=[ 1752], 10.00th=[ 2040], | 20.00th=[ 2040], 30.00th=[ 2320], 40.00th=[ 2640], | 50.00th=[ 2640], 60.00th=[ 2928], 70.00th=[ 3216], | 80.00th=[ 3216], 90.00th=[ 4080], 95.00th=[ 4640], | 99.00th=[ 7904], 99.50th=[ 10560], 99.90th=[8716288], | 99.95th=[9109504], 99.99th=[9240576] bw ( KiB/s): min= 24, max=1543457, per=100.00%, avg=227861.36, stdev=262064.21, samples=2093 iops : min= 6, max=385864, avg=56965.30, stdev=65516.07, samples=2093 lat (usec) : 2=7.53%, 4=80.62%, 10=11.27%, 20=0.41%, 50=0.03% lat (usec) : 100=0.01%, 250=0.01%, 500=0.01%, 750=0.01%, 1000=0.01% lat (msec) : 2=0.01%, 4=0.01%, 10=0.13%, 20=0.01%, 50=0.01% lat (msec) : 100=0.01%, 250=0.01%, 500=0.01%, 750=0.01%, 1000=0.01% lat (msec) : 2000=0.01%, >=2000=0.01% cpu : usr=3.12%, sys=17.15%, ctx=251826, majf=0, minf=12 IO depths : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% issued rwts: total=0,59630438,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0 latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=1 Run status group 0 (all jobs): WRITE: bw=194MiB/s (203MB/s), 194MiB/s-194MiB/s (203MB/s-203MB/s), io=227GiB (244GB), run=1200478-1200478msec Disk stats (read/write): nvme0n1: ios=0/265014, sectors=0/414735560, merge=0/734, ticks=0/1115350653, in_queue=1115646197, util=98.45%

I'm having a v1.1 board. Now I boot a noble cli image with 6.1.84 vendor kernel. 120s fio test is fine: $ sudo fio --name=randwrite --ioengine=sync --rw=write --bs=4k --numjobs=1 --size=1G --runtime=120s --time_based --directory=/mnt randwrite: (g=0): rw=write, bs=(R) 4096B-4096B, (W) 4096B-4096B, (T) 4096B-4096B, ioengine=sync, iodepth=1 fio-3.36 Starting 1 process Jobs: 1 (f=1): [W(1)][100.0%][w=1079MiB/s][w=276k IOPS][eta 00m:00s] randwrite: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=4531: Wed Dec 11 01:49:08 2024 write: IOPS=229k, BW=895MiB/s (939MB/s)(105GiB/120116msec); 0 zone resets clat (nsec): min=1166, max=1465.6M, avg=3015.61, stdev=345679.23 lat (nsec): min=1458, max=1465.6M, avg=3105.60, stdev=345687.63 clat percentiles (nsec): | 1.00th=[ 1752], 5.00th=[ 1752], 10.00th=[ 1752], 20.00th=[ 2040], | 30.00th=[ 2040], 40.00th=[ 2040], 50.00th=[ 2040], 60.00th=[ 2320], | 70.00th=[ 3216], 80.00th=[ 3216], 90.00th=[ 3504], 95.00th=[ 4080], | 99.00th=[ 6112], 99.50th=[ 7584], 99.90th=[ 11072], 99.95th=[ 13376], | 99.99th=[749568] bw ( KiB/s): min=49304, max=1457152, per=100.00%, avg=929145.40, stdev=313692.78, samples=236 iops : min=12326, max=364288, avg=232286.35, stdev=78423.29, samples=236 lat (usec) : 2=15.55%, 4=79.07%, 10=5.21%, 20=0.15%, 50=0.01% lat (usec) : 100=0.01%, 250=0.01%, 500=0.01%, 750=0.01%, 1000=0.01% lat (msec) : 2=0.01%, 4=0.01%, 10=0.01%, 20=0.01%, 50=0.01% lat (msec) : 100=0.01%, 2000=0.01% cpu : usr=15.40%, sys=77.45%, ctx=52410, majf=0, minf=22 IO depths : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% issued rwts: total=0,27525121,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0 latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=1 Run status group 0 (all jobs): WRITE: bw=895MiB/s (939MB/s), 895MiB/s-895MiB/s (939MB/s-939MB/s), io=105GiB (113GB), run=120116-120116msec Disk stats (read/write): nvme0n1: ios=1/113583, sectors=8/216264040, merge=0/248, ticks=9/45093762, in_queue=45095689, util=90.05% I'm testing with a 256G NVME SSD.

I'm sorry that the image I downloaed from https://www.armbian.com/armsom-sige7/ is running mainline kernel 6.12.1. I did not check the 6.1 vendor kernel. My board is at home and I don't remember the board version. I will test with 6.1 kernel again when I get home today. BTW what kind of NVME SSD you are using?

Fixed by upstream 131.0.6778.108-1~deb12u1: https://packages.debian.org/source/bookworm/chromium

BPi M7 is produced by armsom, and armsom is invested by BPi so there is a BPi logo on board.

I don't use my nvme disk as root partition, so I use fio to test the io performance: $ sudo fio --name=randwrite --ioengine=sync --rw=write --bs=4k --numjobs=1 --size=1G --runtime=1200s --time_based --directory=/mnt randwrite: (g=0): rw=write, bs=(R) 4096B-4096B, (W) 4096B-4096B, (T) 4096B-4096B, ioengine=sync, iodepth=1 fio-3.36 Starting 1 process Jobs: 1 (f=1): [W(1)][100.0%][eta 00m:00s] randwrite: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=4208: Tue Dec 10 00:35:12 2024 write: IOPS=47.6k, BW=186MiB/s (195MB/s)(219GiB/1205176msec); 0 zone resets clat (nsec): min=875, max=3507.7M, avg=3209.46, stdev=612372.83 lat (nsec): min=1166, max=3507.7M, avg=3291.55, stdev=612373.49 clat percentiles (nsec): | 1.00th=[ 1464], 5.00th=[ 1752], 10.00th=[ 2040], 20.00th=[ 2040], | 30.00th=[ 2040], 40.00th=[ 2320], 50.00th=[ 2320], 60.00th=[ 2320], | 70.00th=[ 2320], 80.00th=[ 2320], 90.00th=[ 2640], 95.00th=[ 3504], | 99.00th=[ 5280], 99.50th=[ 5536], 99.90th=[ 9664], 99.95th=[53504], | 99.99th=[91648] bw ( KiB/s): min= 384, max=1467567, per=100.00%, avg=734206.83, stdev=482602.67, samples=626 iops : min= 96, max=366891, avg=183551.56, stdev=120650.66, samples=626 lat (nsec) : 1000=0.01% lat (usec) : 2=9.80%, 4=86.66%, 10=3.45%, 20=0.03%, 50=0.01% lat (usec) : 100=0.04%, 250=0.01%, 500=0.01%, 750=0.01%, 1000=0.01% lat (msec) : 2=0.01%, 4=0.01%, 10=0.01%, 20=0.01%, 50=0.01% lat (msec) : 100=0.01%, 250=0.01%, 500=0.01%, 750=0.01%, 1000=0.01% lat (msec) : 2000=0.01%, >=2000=0.01% cpu : usr=2.85%, sys=14.76%, ctx=193337, majf=0, minf=21 IO depths : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% issued rwts: total=0,57409537,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0 latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=1 Run status group 0 (all jobs): WRITE: bw=186MiB/s (195MB/s), 186MiB/s-186MiB/s (195MB/s-195MB/s), io=219GiB (235GB), run=1205176-1205176msec Disk stats (read/write): nvme0n1: ios=0/234874, sectors=0/457824096, merge=0/198, ticks=0/281679979, in_queue=281774755, util=92.39%

Just checked ubuntu noble image from https://www.armbian.com/armsom-sige7/, which has 6.1.84 kernel. nvme disk is detected. I did not do a stress test on it. Simple mounting partition, writing some data one it is fine.

Armbian is using zram to configure swap by default, so it has no swap partitrion in its image. I you want separate swap partition you have to install the system on your own, by rsync the whole system to parted NVME root patition, and write correct root partition UUID to /boot/armbianEnv.txt, and config swap in /etc/fstab.

I don't know why the man from kodi recommend opengl instead if opengles, it's arm platform, opengl won't work.