... unfortunately I see at position 4 only /dev/md0 instead of the M.2 Sata on /dev/sda
root@helios64:/dev# lsblk
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
sda 8:0 0 119.2G 0 disk
sdb 8:16 0 3.7T 0 disk
└─md0 9:0 0 7.3T 0 raid5 /srv/dev-disk-by-label-nas
sdc 8:32 0 3.7T 0 disk
└─md0 9:0 0 7.3T 0 raid5 /srv/dev-disk-by-label-nas
sdd 8:48 0 3.7T 0 disk
└─md0 9:0 0 7.3T 0 raid5 /srv/dev-disk-by-label-nas
mmcblk2 179:0 0 14.6G 0 disk
└─mmcblk2p1 179:1 0 14.4G 0 part /
mmcblk2boot0 179:32 0 4M 1 disk
mmcblk2boot1 179:64 0 4M 1 disk
root@helios64:/dev#
does anyone know what my error is here?
I use OMV and have 3 hard disk running in RAID 5.
Previously the hard drives were connected to SATA 1, SATA 3 and SATA 5.
I had to change the hard drive on SATA 1 to 2, because the M.2 needs the SATA 1.
Is it perhaps because of this?
You can post now and register later.
If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.
Question
TDCroPower
Hi to all,
after the 16GB of the eMMC is slowly reaching my limits, I installed a 128GB M.2 SSD and wanted to use the kobol tutorial to transfer the system data on it...
https://wiki.kobol.io/helios64/install/transfer/#transfer-rootfs-from-emmc-to-sata-or-usb
... unfortunately I see at position 4 only /dev/md0 instead of the M.2 Sata on /dev/sda
root@helios64:/dev# lsblk NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT sda 8:0 0 119.2G 0 disk sdb 8:16 0 3.7T 0 disk └─md0 9:0 0 7.3T 0 raid5 /srv/dev-disk-by-label-nas sdc 8:32 0 3.7T 0 disk └─md0 9:0 0 7.3T 0 raid5 /srv/dev-disk-by-label-nas sdd 8:48 0 3.7T 0 disk └─md0 9:0 0 7.3T 0 raid5 /srv/dev-disk-by-label-nas mmcblk2 179:0 0 14.6G 0 disk └─mmcblk2p1 179:1 0 14.4G 0 part / mmcblk2boot0 179:32 0 4M 1 disk mmcblk2boot1 179:64 0 4M 1 disk root@helios64:/dev#
does anyone know what my error is here?
I use OMV and have 3 hard disk running in RAID 5.
Previously the hard drives were connected to SATA 1, SATA 3 and SATA 5.
I had to change the hard drive on SATA 1 to 2, because the M.2 needs the SATA 1.
Is it perhaps because of this?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
4 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.