All Activity
- Past hour
-
nanopi-r4s, enp1s0 ethernet device not found after reboot
Werner replied to Junkman's topic in NanoPi R4S
Another attempt, again check https://testing.armbian.de/r4s/?C=M&O=D for most recent debs. This time adding an artificial bus scan delay into the r4s dts. Another poke in the dark but perhaps... - Today
-
See inline comments. Dirty SPI may cause this but without logs from serial console this is just a guess
-
Is there mainline support for a7a now
-
I will try downgrading u-boot next once I find the older package somewhere. Kernel does not seem to be the cause given that it has been working fine with both my own build 6.6.122 and 6.6.128 before and rolling back not helping. New device is something I had on my mind for a while. But given the RAM and SSD prices these days, I do not really want to overspend. Not to mention that the SBC landscape has not been that great lately when it comes to compact NAS offerings. HC4 is five years old at this point. Many even recommend N100 but this is a whole different size category.
-
I would not be surprised if there has always been a HW initialization issue. It is just that now with newer Linux (whole systemd stuff etc) you hit this problem. I always liked this HC1, but it is not even on Odroid WiKi anymore. You might need to focus on version/build of U-Boot in combination with kernel and DTB. I have some examples (Rockchip based SBC's) were it is make-or-break, e.g. if I just take latest U-Boot whole system / use-case is useless / gone. So I need to stick to legacy U-Boot or just buy other HW/platform.
-
This could be, but something has changed and is now triggering this behaviour. Warm reboots have been working fine for years.
-
Is the much trouble USB-SATA chip, I have it as 'cable', but unused as it at least fails with RPI4 when SSD. It looks like a sequencing/timing issue. You can treat it like external maybe and/or reset the USB device node. That usually works for various USB connected HW that fails at boot but when Linux/platform fully up and running, a reset then somehow avoids timing issues.
-
Good day, I have recently purchased an Orange Pi 5 Pro and want to use Armbian on it. Armbian (Debian 13 Trixie) does not boot and gives a initramfs error. I have read on erasing the SPI flash memory, but have a few questions. Will erasing the SPI flash memory affect the booting of other operating systems. Is it safe to erase the SPI flash memory? What is the issue around Armbian not booting because of the SPI flash memory? How exactly would I safely erase the SPI flash memory? Thank You
-
Other packages upgraded by unattended-upgrades: Start-Date: 2026-03-15 10:51:39 Commandline: apt upgrade Requested-By: julas (1000) Upgrade: linux-base:armhf (4.12~bpo12+1, 4.12.1~bpo12+1) End-Date: 2026-03-15 10:51:51 Start-Date: 2026-03-16 06:20:00 Commandline: /usr/bin/unattended-upgrade Upgrade: linux-image-current-odroidxu4:armhf (25.11.2.3, 26.2.1) End-Date: 2026-03-16 06:21:56 Start-Date: 2026-03-16 06:22:47 Commandline: /usr/bin/unattended-upgrade Upgrade: base-files:armhf (25.11.2-12.4+deb12u12-bookworm, 26.2.1-12.4+deb12u13-bookworm), armbian-bsp-cli-odroidxu4-current:armhf (25.11.2, 26.2.1) End-Date: 2026-03-16 06:23:48 Start-Date: 2026-03-16 06:24:54 Commandline: /usr/bin/unattended-upgrade Upgrade: armbian-firmware:armhf (25.11.2, 26.2.1) End-Date: 2026-03-16 06:26:03 Start-Date: 2026-03-16 06:26:48 Commandline: /usr/bin/unattended-upgrade Upgrade: linux-dtb-current-odroidxu4:armhf (25.11.2.3, 26.2.1) End-Date: 2026-03-16 06:26:52 Start-Date: 2026-03-16 06:27:35 Commandline: /usr/bin/unattended-upgrade Upgrade: linux-u-boot-odroidxu4-current:armhf (25.11.2, 26.2.1) End-Date: 2026-03-16 06:27:37 Unfortunately, the previous versions seem to be gone from the repos. Is there any way of getting these back?
-
Rolling "back" linux-{dtb,image}-current to my self-built 6.6.128 did not help.
-
I was able to see the data on the drive just fine when connected to another machine via eSATA cable. Oddly enough, the partition showed back up again after reattaching it to the odroid and starting it again. I have then rebooted the odroid again, and the partition went away once again. So it appears to be some sort of cold vs warm boot difference.
-
Hello, I have updated my Odroid HC1 to 26.2.1 - just the kernel, u-boot and such. I have been running a self-built 6.6.128 prior so kernel version itself is unlikely the issue. After rebooting, my SATA drive seems dead - no partitions are detected, only the main sda device. This is what the journal said before: Mar 05 15:51:31 kernel: usb 4-1: new SuperSpeed USB device number 2 using xhci-hcd Mar 05 15:51:31 kernel: usb 4-1: New USB device found, idVendor=152d, idProduct=0578, bcdDevice=31.02 Mar 05 15:51:31 kernel: usb 4-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3 Mar 05 15:51:31 kernel: usb 4-1: Product: USB to ATA/ATAPI Bridge Mar 05 15:51:31 kernel: usb 4-1: Manufacturer: JMicron Mar 05 15:51:31 kernel: usb 4-1: SerialNumber: 0123456789ABCDEF Mar 05 15:51:31 kernel: SCSI subsystem initialized Mar 05 15:51:31 kernel: usbcore: registered new interface driver usb-storage Mar 05 15:51:31 kernel: scsi host0: uas Mar 05 15:51:31 kernel: usbcore: registered new interface driver uas Mar 05 15:51:31 kernel: scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access JMicron Generic 3102 PQ: 0 ANSI: 6 Mar 05 15:51:31 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 3907029168 512-byte logical blocks: (2.00 TB/1.82 TiB) Mar 05 15:51:31 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 4096-byte physical blocks Mar 05 15:51:31 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off Mar 05 15:51:31 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 53 00 00 08 Mar 05 15:51:31 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Disabling FUA Mar 05 15:51:31 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA Mar 05 15:51:31 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Preferred minimum I/O size 4096 bytes Mar 05 15:51:31 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Optimal transfer size 33553920 bytes not a multiple of preferred minimum block size (4096 bytes) Mar 05 15:51:31 kernel: sda: sda1 Mar 05 15:51:31 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk This is what it says now: Mar 19 09:36:34 kernel: usb 4-1: New USB device found, idVendor=152d, idProduct=0578, bcdDevice=31.02 Mar 19 09:36:34 kernel: usb 4-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3 Mar 19 09:36:34 kernel: usb 4-1: Product: USB to ATA/ATAPI Bridge Mar 19 09:36:34 kernel: usb 4-1: Manufacturer: JMicron Mar 19 09:36:34 kernel: usb 4-1: SerialNumber: 0123456789ABCDEF Mar 19 09:36:34 kernel: SCSI subsystem initialized Mar 19 09:36:34 kernel: usbcore: registered new interface driver usb-storage Mar 19 09:36:34 kernel: scsi host0: uas Mar 19 09:36:34 kernel: usbcore: registered new interface driver uas Mar 19 09:36:34 kernel: scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access JMicron Generic 3102 PQ: 0 ANSI: 6 Mar 19 09:36:34 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Unit Not Ready Mar 19 09:36:34 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Sense Key : 0x4 [current] Mar 19 09:36:34 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] ASC=0x44 <<vendor>>ASCQ=0x81 Mar 19 09:36:34 kernel: r8152-cfgselector 6-1: reset SuperSpeed USB device number 2 using xhci-hcd Mar 19 09:36:34 kernel: r8152 6-1:1.0: load rtl8153a-3 v2 02/07/20 successfully Mar 19 09:36:34 kernel: r8152 6-1:1.0 eth0: v1.12.13 Mar 19 09:36:34 kernel: r8152-cfgselector 6-1: reset SuperSpeed USB device number 2 using xhci-hcd Mar 19 09:36:34 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Read Capacity(16) failed: Result: hostbyte=0x07 driverbyte=DRIVER_OK Mar 19 09:36:34 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Sense Key : 0x4 [current] Mar 19 09:36:34 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] ASC=0x44 <<vendor>>ASCQ=0x81 Mar 19 09:36:34 kernel: r8152 6-1:1.0: load rtl8153a-3 v2 02/07/20 successfully Mar 19 09:36:34 kernel: r8152 6-1:1.0 eth0: v1.12.13 Mar 19 09:36:34 kernel: r8152 6-1:1.0 enx001e06326076: renamed from eth0 Mar 19 09:36:34 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Read Capacity(10) failed: Result: hostbyte=0x07 driverbyte=DRIVER_OK Mar 19 09:36:34 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Sense Key : 0x4 [current] Mar 19 09:36:34 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] ASC=0x44 <<vendor>>ASCQ=0x81 Mar 19 09:36:34 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 0 512-byte logical blocks: (0 B/0 B) Mar 19 09:36:34 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 0-byte physical blocks Mar 19 09:36:34 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Test WP failed, assume Write Enabled Mar 19 09:36:34 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Asking for cache data failed Mar 19 09:36:34 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Assuming drive cache: write through Mar 19 09:36:34 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Preferred minimum I/O size 4096 bytes not a multiple of physical block size (0 bytes) Mar 19 09:36:34 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Optimal transfer size 33553920 bytes not a multiple of physical block size (0 bytes) Mar 19 09:36:34 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk I will try attaching the drive to another PC to exclude a poorly timed hardware failure.
-
hi all. any hints to merge olimex imx8 board and compile armbian kernel 6.x and deb12 ?
-
Armbian for H313 X96-Q LPDDR3 TV-Box
lavieautrement replied to sicxnull's topic in Allwinner CPU Boxes
hello ,my box is mortal t1 2g8rom and motherboard show mortal t2 v2.0 it's broken and i wanna make linux boot what's the most version to be able for my box -
nanopi-r4s, enp1s0 ethernet device not found after reboot
Igor replied to Junkman's topic in NanoPi R4S
[ 1.234958] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: PCIe link training gen1 timeout! [ 1.235032] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: probe with driver rockchip-pcie failed with error -110 PCI support on this SoC has never been fully stable. Patch that tries to mitigate the issue, exists: https://github.com/armbian/build/blob/main/patch/kernel/archive/rockchip64-6.18/rk3399-fix-pci-phy.patch Not really much we can do more - use a kernel that it works, try current one with few reboots, ... I know its not perfect but we have nobody that can afford investing few weeks trying to fix this. Imagine the frustration if nothing will be improved - which I highly suspect for this case. -
nanopi-r4s, enp1s0 ethernet device not found after reboot
Werner replied to Junkman's topic in NanoPi R4S
Hm. Well. Im out of ideas. Perhaps openwrt will find something when they're going to work on 6.18. Unmarked the old solution for now since it no longer applies. -
I don't know if it's useful, but folks have been attaching external GPUs to low power boards for a while. My personal favorite was sacking and desoldering a USB3 controller to reuse it's PCIE lane: https://mloduchowski.com/raspberry-pi-4-b-pci-express/ Others have run into the same BAR limitation you noted: https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2020/external-gpus-and-raspberry-pi-compute-module-4/ From a practical perspective, I'm not sure how many folks would be interested in discrete GPUs, as I'm not sure these sorts of boards would have the CPU or PCIE lanes to really make use of that extra horsepower. Most would get a dedicated embedded system, or a bespoke NVidia setup. For what it's worth, I ran into an issue where the kernel was too big for u-boot to boot it, and would just throw a synchronous abort and reset. The difference between working and not working was 7 MB.
- Yesterday
-
That is true that there are images that target server vs. desktop. But they share the same kernel. I find what you are working on an interesting idea. Good luck getting it working.
-
Yes, it is a fair point that I've not demonstrated that it can actually be made to work yet, I'm working on that part,.... and as you say, it's also a fair question to ask how much impact compiling those drivers as modules has on systems not using them. That latter question I /can/ answer. The increase in the kernel in memory is about 5MB, and the increase in the /lib/modules/ is about 26MB I did notice when I went through the build process to make a new kernel/image (That's pretty impressive work BTW, great job!)... that there is a distinction between a server and desktop image... obviously in the server build this wouldn't be a thing, and the desktop image would probably be useless on a machine that couldn't spare 5MB... Point taken tho, I'll post some updates here once it's working.
-
Hi Armbian_25.5.1_Rpi4b_bookworm_current_6.12.28 broken after last upgrade. I run apt upgrade which installed kernel 6.18.10. It breaks ZFS. Provided ZFS version, 2.3.2, supports kernels up to 6.14. Don't forget a snapshot before "apt upgrade" 🙂 Regards, Chris
-
Ultimately, once you have this working, you should submit a PR and justify the inclusion of this feature with details on the pros and cons.
-
How much size does it add? Remember there are a wide variety of boards supported some with limited storage and ram.
-
Hmm, after a lot of fiddling, I have concluded that the particular GPU I have needs a BAR size larger than the hardware platform can deliver... the stock DTB supplied with Armbian limits it to 1GB, and I managed to increase it to 2GB without issue... but the card requires 2GB+ 2MB, and so it fails every time. It seems that some other cards, both older and newer have more flexible VBIOS, so I'm going to try to obtain one of those, and lets see where we get to. I'd still like to ask that AMDGPU and XE graphics modules be enabled in the regular Armbian kernel, it doesn't seem like a big overhead!... Updates once I find another card.
-
nanopi-r4s, enp1s0 ethernet device not found after reboot
ArmUser replied to Junkman's topic in NanoPi R4S
First of all, thank you for the quick reply. I installed the new deb files over the old ones. Unfortunately, the enp1s0 interface is still missing. Here are the new log files after installing the new deb files: https://paste.armbian.com/ivofogiqeb -
nanopi-r4s, enp1s0 ethernet device not found after reboot
Werner replied to Junkman's topic in NanoPi R4S
https://testing.armbian.de/r4s/?C=M&O=D Check for the more recent files. This has a different attempt to fix it by reverting some stuff to be more like 6.12
