Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello everyone,

 

I've been running my Helios64 for about 2 months now. My system is installed on the eMMC and i'm running a few docker containers (all from linuxserver.io)

  • Radarr
  • Sonarr
  • Bazarr
  • Transmission
  • Jackett
  • Jellyfin

 

I'm having difficulties with Jellyfin and my media library. When lauching tv shows or movies, the CPU rockets to ~97-99% use and the media is constantly stopping to load.

I would like to know what I can do to ease the strain on the CPU and be finally able to use Jellyfin.

Has anyone been able to use hardware acceleration with docker ?

 

What info can I give you to shade light on the matter ?

 

Regards

<
Posted

Actually it is not about hardware acceleration in docker. It is more about hardware acceleration at all that needs to be verified if it works

Posted
5 hours ago, Werner said:

Actually it is not about hardware acceleration in docker. It is more about hardware acceleration at all that needs to be verified if it works

It seems V4L2_M2M acceleration (h264 encode support) is our best option for ffmpeg, however, I have not made much progress beyond learning as I go. If you make progress that'd be great to know.

Posted
On 12/17/2020 at 5:20 PM, louismax said:

Hello everyone,

 

I've been running my Helios64 for about 2 months now. My system is installed on the eMMC and i'm running a few docker containers (all from linuxserver.io)

  • Radarr
  • Sonarr
  • Bazarr
  • Transmission
  • Jackett
  • Jellyfin

 

I'm having difficulties with Jellyfin and my media library. When lauching tv shows or movies, the CPU rockets to ~97-99% use and the media is constantly stopping to load.

I would like to know what I can do to ease the strain on the CPU and be finally able to use Jellyfin.

Has anyone been able to use hardware acceleration with docker ?

 

What info can I give you to shade light on the matter ?

 

Regards

I am struggling as well. 

 

So far Jellyfin seems to be struggling with playing x265 video's. I get the same effect as you.

 

On the other hand x264 seems to be working well, but I didn't extensively test it yet.

 

Any one can explain what we are exactly missing for x265? From what I read the chip should be able to handle it, so I am hopeful. 

Posted

Because there is no real driver for using the rockchips videoengine yet. It uses software transcoding which obviously needs lots of cpu power.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Guidelines