ebin-dev Posted yesterday at 01:55 PM Author Posted yesterday at 01:55 PM On 1/30/2025 at 12:15 PM, kantantana said: But still, iperf3 says barely 200mbit/s, this is on the 1gbit interface. Another laptop towards same server, on same lan same switch gets 950mbit/s. Since only one of your laptops is affected by the reduced transfer speed I would rather search for any issues there (update NIC driver, check NIC configuration, exclude cable/connection issues, etc.). 0 Quote
kantantana Posted yesterday at 02:26 PM Posted yesterday at 02:26 PM I did the tests on helios64, from 2 different laptops and one desktop, between the desktops and laptops I always get 950mbit/s, it is only helios64 which gets close to 200mbit/s to any of them. They are all on the same switch and same lan. Even worse, for helios64 with iperf3 -u (udp) I get barely 1mbit/s. I did another test today, this time checked cpufreq-info helios was on 480Mhz so maybe it was too slow to increase freq? So I did dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null bs=1M and let it run, it was burning 1 cpu core, helios went to 1.2Ghz, did the iperf3 test and same results, barely 200Mbit/s. ethtool does say 1000 full duplex on that interface. Also tried the ethtool -k tso gso gro on and so on, no difference. The 2.5gbit/tests I did with a cable from the helios directly to an odroid h4+ which also has a 2.5gbit port, no switch inbetween at all, that test failed stability and the link was resetting on the helios64. btw this is the sha256sum a538d69ca94b31fdf91d047ec7c54970465f7d008081738baaaa5fc09be97e94 of the dtb /lib/linux-image-6.12.11-current-rockchip64/rockchip/rk3399-kobol-helios64.dtb Im using taken from this thread 0 Quote
ebin-dev Posted yesterday at 02:45 PM Author Posted yesterday at 02:45 PM (edited) 22 hours ago, kantantana said: I did another test today, this time checked cpufreq-info helios was on 480Mhz so maybe it was too slow to increase freq? So I did dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null bs=1M and let it run, it was burning 1 cpu core, helios went to 1.2Ghz, did the iperf3 test and same results, barely 200Mbit/s. ethtool does say 1000 full duplex on that interface. Also tried the ethtool -k tso gso gro on and so on, no difference. I have only checked the performance of the 2.5G interface with linux 6.12.10 - not the 1G interface. Could you check if the issue remains if you use linux 6.6.74 ? (install with 'dpkg -i linux*'; replace the dtb with the one attached; execute 'update-initramfs -u'; reboot) Edit: The 2.5G interface needs the hardware fix in order to operate reliably in mode 2500baseT/Full too: during ethernet handshaking 1G speeds could be established transiently. I think that this might have happened during the test with odroid h4+. Edit: You mentioned that helios went to 1.2GHz during the transfer. If the load is handled by a little core that may be the reason for the reduced transfer speed. A big core should be assigned to it. Therefore, the following code in /etc/rc.local is very helpful in this context (it also configures the ondemand governor and makes it responsive) [armbian-hardware-optimization is disabled on my system]: cd /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq for cpufreqpolicy in 0 4 ; do echo 1 > policy${cpufreqpolicy}/ondemand/io_is_busy echo 25 > policy${cpufreqpolicy}/ondemand/up_threshold echo 10 > policy${cpufreqpolicy}/ondemand/sampling_down_factor echo $(cat policy${cpufreqpolicy}/cpuinfo_transition_latency) > policy${cpufreqpolicy}/ondemand/sampling_rate done for i in $(awk -F":" "/ahci/ {print \$1}" < /proc/interrupts | sed 's/\ //g'); do echo 10 > /proc/irq/$i/smp_affinity done for i in $(awk -F":" "/xhci/ {print \$1}" < /proc/interrupts | sed 's/\ //g'); do echo 20 > /proc/irq/$i/smp_affinity done exit 0 While transferring data to/from Helios64 some processes are involved such as iperf3 - or netatalk in my case. Those processes should also be executed on a big core. If iperf3 tests are performed or if helios64 is mounted as a remote drive I call the following script that assigns a big core and a preferred io scheduling class to those processes (to be adapted to your needs). This helps to make your nas_processes faster (kudos to @tkaiser) . # cat /usr/local/bin/make_nas_processes_faster.sh #!/bin/sh -e for i in `pgrep "afpd|cnid|iperf3|netatalk"` ; do ionice -c1 -p $i ; taskset -c -p 4 $i; done # >/dev/null 2>&1 rk3399-kobol-helios64.dtb-6.6.xx-L2-hs400-opp Edited 4 hours ago by ebin-dev 0 Quote
prahal Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago The 2.5Gbps hardware issue is when operating in 1Gbps mode only (2.5Gbps was always fine hardware wise) https://blog.kobol.io/2020/11/13/helios64-2-5g-ethernet-issue/ 0 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.