guidol Posted January 18, 2018 Share Posted January 18, 2018 12 hours ago, Jota79 said: Showing Temperature is missing in last two kernels: root@zeus:/sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0# uname -a Linux zeus 4.14.13-sunxi64 #35 SMP Tue Jan 16 17:51:14 CET 2018 aarch64 GNU/Linux root@zeus:/sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0# armbianmonitor -m Stop monitoring using [ctrl]-[c] Time CPU load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq C.St. 20:50:25: 816MHz 1.82 22% 3% 3% 4% 10% 0% 0/2 20:50:30: 816MHz 1.83 16% 3% 1% 6% 5% 0% 0/2 On my Zero Plus H5 its working: ARMBIAN 5.37.180117 nightly Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) 4.14.13-sunxi64 Linux opi-zeroplus 4.14.13-sunxi64 #35 SMP Tue Jan 16 17:51:14 CET 2018 aarch64 GNU/Linux root@opi-zeroplus:~# armbianmonitor -m Stop monitoring using [ctrl]-[c] Time CPU load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq CPU C.St. 14:47:32: 816MHz 0.00 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 43.4°C 0/2 14:47:38: 816MHz 0.00 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 42.8°C 0/2 14:47:43: 816MHz 0.00 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 42.5°C 0/2 14:47:48: 816MHz 0.00 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 42.8°C 0/2 root@opi-zeroplus:~# ls -la /etc/armbianmonitor/datasources/soctemp lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 47 Jan 14 08:17 /etc/armbianmonitor/datasources/soctemp -> /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone0/temp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jota79 Posted January 18, 2018 Share Posted January 18, 2018 9 hours ago, guidol said: On my Zero Plus H5 its working: ARMBIAN 5.37.180117 nightly Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) 4.14.13-sunxi64 Linux opi-zeroplus 4.14.13-sunxi64 #35 SMP Tue Jan 16 17:51:14 CET 2018 aarch64 GNU/Linux root@opi-zeroplus:~# armbianmonitor -m Stop monitoring using [ctrl]-[c] Time CPU load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq CPU C.St. 14:47:32: 816MHz 0.00 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 43.4°C 0/2 14:47:38: 816MHz 0.00 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 42.8°C 0/2 14:47:43: 816MHz 0.00 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 42.5°C 0/2 14:47:48: 816MHz 0.00 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 42.8°C 0/2 root@opi-zeroplus:~# ls -la /etc/armbianmonitor/datasources/soctemp lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 47 Jan 14 08:17 /etc/armbianmonitor/datasources/soctemp -> /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone0/temp It is very strange..... I have lost symbolyc link to /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone0/temp: root@zeus:~# armbianmonitor -m Stop monitoring using [ctrl]-[c] Time CPU load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq C.St. 20:47:06: 816MHz 0.33 14% 1% 5% 2% 3% 0% 0/2^C root@zeus:~# ls -la /etc/armbianmonitor/datasources/soctemp ls: cannot access '/etc/armbianmonitor/datasources/soctemp': No such file or directory I have to create it manually and voila! : root@zeus:~# ln -s /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone0/temp /etc/armbianmonitor/datasources/soctemp root@zeus:~# armbianmonitor -m Stop monitoring using [ctrl]-[c] Time CPU load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq CPU C.St. 20:52:46: 816MHz 1.79 14% 1% 5% 2% 3% 0% 64.6°C 0/2 20:52:51: 816MHz 1.81 30% 5% 7% 4% 11% 1% 63.4°C 0/2^C It is very strange.... Thank you guidol! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jota79 Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 Guidol... Do you have any active cooling? Your temperatures are very low... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guidol Posted January 21, 2018 Share Posted January 21, 2018 12 hours ago, Jota79 said: Guidol... Do you have any active cooling? Your temperatures are very low... No - only passive inside a black cube Raspberry Zero Case - but my Opi Zero Plus is almost idle You could see my "modified" black qube cas here: but my case does stand on the side (heat can flow away and the room temperature is aroud 20 degree): root@opi-zeroplus:~# armbianmonitor -m Stop monitoring using [ctrl]-[c] Time CPU load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq CPU C.St. 12:36:14: 816MHz 0.07 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 42.2°C 0/2 12:36:19: 816MHz 0.06 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 43.3°C 0/2 12:36:24: 816MHz 0.06 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 41.9°C 0/2 12:36:29: 816MHz 0.05 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 43.4°C 0/2 12:36:34: 816MHz 0.05 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 42.7°C 0/2 As attachment some temperatures - out of my NodeRed Dashboard - to compare Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jota79 Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 On 21/1/2018 at 10:38 AM, guidol said: No - only passive inside a black cube Raspberry Zero Case - but my Opi Zero Plus is almost idle You could see my "modified" black qube cas here: but my case does stand on the side (heat can flow away and the room temperature is aroud 20 degree): root@opi-zeroplus:~# armbianmonitor -m Stop monitoring using [ctrl]-[c] Time CPU load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq CPU C.St. 12:36:14: 816MHz 0.07 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 42.2°C 0/2 12:36:19: 816MHz 0.06 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 43.3°C 0/2 12:36:24: 816MHz 0.06 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 41.9°C 0/2 12:36:29: 816MHz 0.05 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 43.4°C 0/2 12:36:34: 816MHz 0.05 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 42.7°C 0/2 As attachment some temperatures - out of my NodeRed Dashboard - to compare uooohhhh!!!!! What a tiny "big" CPD!!!!! ;-) Thank you very much, guidol. It is a very good reference for me. Now, I have moved my orange pi zero plus H5 to a very open-space ( it was inside a very closed furniture before.... ). I have moved it behind my plasma TV ;-). And now, almost idle, temperature is in normal values ( with 21C room temperature ): root@zeus:~# armbianmonitor -m Stop monitoring using [ctrl]-[c] Time CPU load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq CPU C.St. 22:02:28: 816MHz 0.36 10% 1% 1% 3% 3% 0% 47.2°C 0/2 22:02:33: 816MHz 0.33 4% 1% 2% 0% 0% 0% 44.4°C 0/2 22:02:38: 816MHz 0.31 2% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 45.0°C 0/2 22:02:43: 816MHz 0.28 2% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 42.2°C 0/2 22:02:49: 816MHz 0.34 2% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 44.3°C 0/2 22:02:54: 816MHz 0.31 3% 1% 2% 0% 0% 0% 45.3°C 0/2 22:02:59: 816MHz 0.29 2% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 46.2°C 0/2 22:03:04: 816MHz 0.34 2% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 43.0°C 0/2 22:03:09: 816MHz 0.32 6% 1% 5% 0% 0% 0% 47.2°C 0/2 22:03:14: 816MHz 0.29 2% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 44.5°C 0/2 22:03:19: 816MHz 0.27 3% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 43.9°C 0/2 22:03:24: 816MHz 0.25 3% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 45.4°C 0/2 22:03:29: 816MHz 0.23 2% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 44.9°C 0/2 22:03:34: 816MHz 0.21 5% 1% 3% 0% 0% 0% 45.4°C 0/2 Time CPU load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq CPU C.St. 22:03:39: 816MHz 0.19 2% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 44.2°C 0/2 22:03:44: 816MHz 0.17 2% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 44.6°C 0/2 22:03:50: 816MHz 0.16 3% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 44.3°C 0/2 I use my OP Zero for NAS Server ( samba/nfs ) and for p2p downloads with mldonkey. You can see my brico-project with an old celeron heatsink ( I am very worried with temperatures, perhaps I am a little friki... ): 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jota79 Posted February 12, 2018 Share Posted February 12, 2018 (edited) Another time poor network throughput with last kernel ( 5.37.180117 - 4.14.18-sunxi64 ). Is it possible to select another kernel ? At last It was an issue in my PC, at samba client side. My PC connects to 2.4Ghz instead of 5Ghz one Thanks in advance Edited February 26, 2018 by Jota79 It was my fault, not kernel issue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jota79 Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 On 12/2/2018 at 9:50 PM, Jota79 said: Another time poor network throughput with last kernel ( 5.37.180117 - 4.14.18-sunxi64 ). Is it possible to select another kernel ? Thanks in advance It is probabily for my weak charger/psu. I only need 0.5a but my weak charger/psu only get 4.88v at 0.45a. With an estimated vdroop of 0.2-0.3 with my usb cable ( 1 meter, not AWG20... ) my orange pi probabily get 4.6v. I am not very sure, I am going testing that some days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jota79 Posted February 26, 2018 Share Posted February 26, 2018 On 15/2/2018 at 10:53 PM, Jota79 said: It is probabily for my weak charger/psu. I only need 0.5a but my weak charger/psu only get 4.88v at 0.45a. With an estimated vdroop of 0.2-0.3 with my usb cable ( 1 meter, not AWG20... ) my orange pi probabily get 4.6v. I am not very sure, I am going testing that some days. At last the guilty was not my weak charger/psu, the issue was at client side. My PC, my samba client, connects to 2.4Ghz wifi sometimes and connects to 5Ghz wifi anothertimes. 2.4Ghz -> poor network throughput, 5Ghz -> good network throughput. It was not a kernel problem, nor power/hardware issue. It is my fault, sorry for confusion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts