All Activity

Good afternoon. I bought a NanoPi R76s rev. 2 (3GB RAM + 0 EMMC). It works fine with the manufacturer's firmware. However, it doesn't boot on Armbian (26.02.1). I assume rev. 2 isn't supported. Is it possible to add support? Armbian_26.2.1_Nanopi-r76s_noble_vendor_6.1.115_gnome_desktop.img.xz --- my build from tag 26.02.1: (log https://paste.armbian.com/poduzitifu ) --- vendor ubuntu boot log https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OZqZk48LsbSzFz63fcqMKVp5YkhyNOoT/view?usp=drive_link (rk3576-sd-ubuntu-noble-gnome-desktop-6.1-arm64-20260403.img.gz)

Hey guys and @jock. Thanks for the references. not very fast, but stable and working on a s905w. (guess to be a tx3 mini, but who knows...) kernel 6.18.10 and ssv6051p. Linux aml-s9xx-box 6.18.10-current-meson64 #3 SMP PREEMPT Wed Feb 11 12:42:01 UTC 2026 aarch64 GNU/Linux with speedtest-cli Download: 3.43 Mbit/s Upload: 1.55 Mbit/s yeah, slow. but stable... i guess dmesg [ 11.938463] SSV WLAN driver ssv6200: chip id: RSV6200A0-201311, tag: 2014012420010960 [ 12.006600] SSV WLAN driver ssv6200: attempt to load firmware ssv6051-sw.bin [ 12.021645] SSV WLAN driver ssv6200: firmware upload complete (wrote 80 blocks, verified 80 blocks) [ 12.138546] SSV WLAN driver ssv6200: Firmware version 16380 [ 12.141013] SSV WLAN driver ssv6200: Calibration successful https://github.com/eloirotava/6051 the repo has also the rtl8188fu driver to the same soc/kernel. it is better than the ssv for sure... The trick was tuning the ssv6051-wifi.cfg to disableHT/AMPDU that usually kill the SDIO bus on these SOCs.

Video here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kv2QVMMgRizKrjZIGVVMYK3QxkswTA9K/view?usp=sharing Hi there, I have the following stack: Model: ROC-RK3588S-PC V12 (Linux) SoC: Rockchip RK3588 GPU: Mali-G610 (Panfrost/Panfork) Kernel: 6.1.0-1025-rockchip OS: Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS (Joshua-Riek image v2.4.0) Mesa: Panfork 23.0.5 (git221210 — December 2022) Chromium: 114.0.5735.35 (rkmpp7 from jjriek/rockchip-multimedia PPA) Display: HDMI-1, 1920x1080@60Hz The problem: I'm running a kiosk application in Chromium that plays video fullscreen. The display is physically mounted in portrait mode (9:16), so I need to rotate the output 270°. When rotation is applied, a visible vertical line artifact appears running from top to bottom, approximately 5cm from the right edge of the screen. Without rotation, the image is perfectly clean — no artifacts at all. What I've tried (all failed to fix the issue): CSS rotation (current method): Using transform: rotate(270deg) on the body element. The line artifact appears consistently. xrandr rotation: xrandr --output HDMI-1 --rotate left — same vertical line artifact appears. Kernel DRM rotation: Added video=HDMI-A-1:1920x1080@60,rotate=270 to kernel cmdline in extlinux.conf. Parameter is visible in /proc/cmdline but has no effect — Rockchip DRM driver does not support the rotate parameter. Chromium flags (tested individually and in combinations): --disable-gpu-compositing — moved the line to the center of the screen --disable-gpu-rasterization / --disable-gpu-vsync — made it worse --use-gl=egl — no effect --enable-gpu-rasterization --enable-zero-copy — no effect --default-tile-width=1920 --default-tile-height=1080 — no effect --gpu-rasterization-msaa-sample-count=0 — no effect --force-device-scale-factor=1 — no effect --use-gl=angle --use-angle=gles-egl --use-cmd-decoder=passthrough — crashed Chromium CSS GPU optimization properties: Tested translateZ(0), backface-visibility: hidden, will-change: transform on the rotation container — no effect on the artifact. Chromium 132 upgrade: Installed chromium 132.0.6834.159-1~deb12u1+rkmpp from liujianfeng1994/chromium PPA. The vertical line remained, and video playback became unstable (freezing). Reverted to Chromium 114. Mesa upgrade to Ubuntu noble-updates 25.2.8: Removed Panfork PPA and installed standard Ubuntu Mesa 25.2.8. GPU fell back to llvmpipe (software rendering) — no Panfrost support for Mali-G610 in standard Mesa. Display showed tearing in the center. Reverted to Panfork 23.0.5. Conclusion: The artifact appears with any rotation method (CSS, xrandr, kernel) and persists across Chromium versions and various GPU flags. This strongly suggests the issue is in the Panfork Mesa / Panfrost compositing layer when handling rotated output on Mali-G610. Has anyone encountered this issue? Is there a known fix or workaround? Would upgrading to Panthor (with kernel 6.10+ or the 6.1 backport) potentially resolve this? Any help would be greatly appreciated.

What's new in armbian-config desktops Pick how much desktop you want — at install time and after Three tiers (minimal / mid / full) instead of one monolithic install. Minimal = DE + display manager + a terminal (~500 MB). Mid adds a browser and everyday apps (~1 GB). Full adds office + creative tools (~2.5 GB). And you can move between tiers later — armbian-config knows the delta and only adds or removes what changed, no reinstall. Clean uninstall, every time Every install records a manifest of exactly which packages it added. Removal undoes only those — packages that were already on the system before you installed the desktop stay put. No more "I uninstalled XFCE and lost half my system." One YAML per desktop, no per-distro hacks Each DE is a single declarative file in tools/modules/desktops/yaml/. Adding or maintaining a desktop no longer means editing scripts; you describe what you want and the engine figures out releases, arches, browsers, and overrides. Adding a new desktop is a YAML edit and a parser smoke test, not a hunt through bash. Same desktop, every supported distro and arch Per-release and per-arch overrides handle the awkward edges: missing packages on armhf, the riscv64 ports that lag behind, the package that got renamed in Ubuntu noble. Same YAML works on Debian bookworm/trixie and Ubuntu noble across amd64 / arm64 / armhf / riscv64. Smart browser selection The literal token browser resolves to the right package per platform automatically — Chromium where it exists, Epiphany on platforms where Chromium is broken, Firefox-ESR on Debian riscv64. No more bug reports about "Chromium won't install on RISC-V." Custom vendor archives, done right Optional repo: block per DE with full support for: signed-by GPG keyring (no apt-key), per-release suite paths (e.g. SpacemiT's per-snapshot bianbu archive), multi-suite fan-out (one archive, six deb lines for security/updates/customization channels), wider component lists than main, and APT pin preferences in the same place. Removed cleanly on uninstall. Auto-login that doesn't trash your config Enable / disable autologin for gdm3, sddm, or lightdm via in-place sed edits — your WaylandEnable=false and other customizations stay intact. Branches on ID=ubuntu from /etc/os-release, so it writes to the right file (Debian's daemon.conf vs Ubuntu's custom.conf) without guessing from the codename. A weekly AI driven self-audit catches drift A scheduled workflow scans the YAML matrix against armbian/build's supported releases and the live Debian/Ubuntu archives — flags releases not yet covered, flags packages that no longer exist upstream — then opens a draft PR with proposed YAML fixes. Dead packages and missing releases stop accumulating silently. armbian-config --api module_desktops User documentation: https://docs.armbian.com/User-Guide_Armbian-Config/System/#desktop

This was discussed some time ago. Everybody has the same problem with the 2.5Gb interface. The best you can do is to switch to linux 6.6.xx, replace the dtb, update the firmware in /lib/firmware/rtl_nic and run a script in /etc/rc.local (see here).

I realized there was a fix within the kernel which sounded like it would help: https://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=176887718125147 it seems to be iincorporated into the LTS kernel by now so I used armbian build to get a 6.18.22 kernel. unfortunately that didn't help. Even worse: after a while the system freezes completely am I really the only one hitting this problem?

use balena etcher or rufus, would work just fine! also you can use Hqnicolas have provided earlier, use a USB to TTL converter. works great if nothing works

@Farhan Ishraq yeah sure! here you go: https://github.com/YuzukiHD/YuzukiChameleon although this image is a bit older, it's currently running debian bullseye i guess. if you need armbian, i would suggest the method that @Sadiq Ahmed applied

Hello, I have installed the Armbian 26.2 minimal IOT image based on Debian 13 Trixie - with the 6.18.x kernel - and I noticed the USB2 port (the single, vertical port next to the Ethernet port) is not working. Is this a limitation of the mainstream kernel (6.18.x) - i.e. does this work only with the vendor kernel (6.1.x) ? NB: I upgraded to 6.19 using the 'edge' kernel, but I'm seeing the same behavior. Here's the armbianmonitor outpur - https://paste.armbian.com/raw/udefojuxuk

After over five years of development and collaboration across the Open Source community, mainline Linux support for Rockchip RK3588's video capture hardware has finally landed. View the full article

@Sergioclr are you sure the board has secure boot enabled? You should install a USB-to-UART TTL device.

After compiling many (10+) images, I was not able to boot a single one through SD card and the "toothpick" technique. It is not my character, but I give up. I am grateful for your support and patience. Thank you. Sergioclr.

@Jugo Slaven it seems you are running Android not Armbian. These forums are for Armbian Linux not Android. You should ask your question at a site that deals with Android.

Providing logs with armbianmonitor -u helps with troubleshooting and significantly raises chances that issue gets addressed.

@SteeMan Firmware on my android box is for MXQ 4k 5g, older original version, and I can send you if you want the .img file of the firmware.The CPU of my android box is sun8iw7 Allwinner.When I power OFF the box I can't power on it anymore.

Hi! The board gets unnormally hot with when i attach the 2.5G Router Hat. (Powered though the HAT) I tried vendor and edge kernel. Same result. Using the radxa image, its significantly cooler. First look through dts i cannot find any problem. Maybe someone has a better understanding? Thanks Jakob

The only thing I could manage to get information from was this: I had to rewrite the SPI-flash and now I see: Not sure if this helps: Btw, this is the output when I was using the official OrangePI Ubuntu distro:

Strangely I can't get any outcome from that command: Now I am confused if there is something else going on, however, the OrangePi official distro recognised the nvme disk.

You need the U-Boot source-code version; I at least cannot conclude on it; You can watch the start-up via serial console, then you will see. Or like this: root@rock3a:~# strings /dev/mtdblock0 | grep "U-Boot SPL 20" U-Boot SPL 2017.09-armbian (May 20 2024 - 00:46:51) I see you have 2 options: which U-Boot is used: mtdblock0 (the SPI-flash) or mmcblk0 (SD-card) ??

Hey @eselarm, Thanks for the quick answer. My goal is indeed having a more generic computer for server tasks. The version of the u-boot is: I have switched again to the orangepi5 6.18.10-current-rockchip64 kernel but still not showing nothing. Thank you.

Log shows nothing about PCIE when 6.19.0-edge-rockchip64, it does when 6.18.8-current-rockchip64 If you just upgraded the kernel via apt, then this might be the point where an older U-Boot is incompatible with newer kernel. This is the case for all Rockchip devices I have and not strange. It is like it is, so if you want edge or newest or even standard Debian sid/unstable/testing kernel, you will need to look at that in more detail. I have been spending a lot of time on it, it is simply what you want or need. If you want all RK3588 silicon HW support, so like video encoders, stick to vendor based U-Boot and kernel. I you want a generic computer that is good enough for server tasks and web-browsing etc, use mainline based U-Boot and kernel. Of course something else might be wrong, but reporting U-Boot version would be needed and helpful first I think.

Problem solved. Rather than using an electrical connection I overcame the issue mechanically. When the board was mounted in the box I drilled a hole directly opposite the switch and inserted an old self propelling biro which I cut down to the right length. I left the spting in place but removed the latching mechanism in the lid. Pressing the top of the biro activated the switch🤪

Hi everyone, I just installed Armbian on my OrangePi 5, but I can't get it to recognize the NVMe drive. I've tried the official OrangePi Ubuntu distro, and it detects the NVMe without any issues. However, when using Armbian, it simply doesn't show up. I'm not sure what to do at this point. I would really like to use Armbian, but it seems unable to detect the NVMe on this particular device. Interestingly, I have another OrangePi 5 Pro where I installed Armbian, and it recognizes the NVMe and works perfectly fine — but not on the standard OrangePi 5. Does anyone know how to fix this issue, or can you recommend a good alternative? Thank you in advance.

@Sergioclr Try this one next. 159-add-x96-q-lpddr3-v1.3-defconfig.patch

😳number of lines of code? My bad. Photo with details: