Jump to content

Igor

Administrators
  • Posts

    14558
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Igor

  1. 10 hours ago, t-bob said:

    then it's OK so i expect the issue  is in armbian-firmware

    Nightly / WIP / preview / development firmware (must) have bugs, otherwise we would call it "stable" :) We provide those builds with purpose of bug hunting and since people expect that they should work (before job is done), we will stop providing them. We waste a lot of time explaining, that it's normal that things breaks, than fixing an actual problem. I made quick check, but can't find where is the problem.

     

    Last time I was testing this feature, it worked as expected - from armbian-config, which does this: https://github.com/armbian/config/blob/dev/debian-config#L601-L615 when issuing "freeze kernel".

  2. Installing KODI is not trivial on any general OS / Debian / Ubuntu, not even on x86 machine. Second, you try to install it on modern 4.x kernel, which arrived on XU4 months ago and it's not matured. I have no idea if this is already possible. Third. Armbian is not focused to provide multimedia / closed source drivers by default, while I think it should be possible to build KODI on top of Armbian. In any case, start rather with old legacy kernel, check (at hardkernel forum) which additional libraries are needed and than you have much better chances to succeed,

  3. 22 hours ago, tkaiser said:

    Since while supporting such devices might be absolutely wrong but board bring up could be fun we could treat these devices simply as 'WiP forever'.


    What about having yet another section with "Limited support". This means they are still getting updates, but no end user support exists for those?

    "No support" section will need some extra work for now and for the future - if we want to have it solved in same design as those boards. If only a link to some .md or forum post, than this is no problem.

  4. 12 hours ago, Tido said:

    Will you open a section in the forum '.unsupported' - so there is a place where those Threads can be put as well ?


    What about just removing unsupported board(s) from forum description & closing new topics with "no more active support"? I don't expect much if any activity on those boards.

     

    If no objections pops out, those four will get last update with 5.30 and will be moved our from armbian mainline support.

  5. On 28. 5. 2017 at 8:52 PM, zador.blood.stained said:

    Prepare a list of boards that should be phased out and reasons for that (no HW samples, no vendor (BSP) development, no mainline development, no documentation, HW design flaws)


    My proposal for removal:

    https://www.armbian.com/orange-pi-mini/ (limited edition, no samples, never sold)

    https://www.armbian.com/orange-pi/ (limited edition, no samples, never sold)

    https://www.armbian.com/lemaker-guitar/ (no development for some time, design flaws, no mainline)

    https://www.armbian.com/roseapple-pi/ (no development for some time, design flaws, no mainline, never sold)

  6. Rules or protocols saves time and helps us to cope with problems regardless if this project is powered by this or that motivation. Well, we can't hire people, since our budget is on "let's go for a beer level", but we have to be more creative. We can talk about and I am sure, we have enough smart people around to come up and go with the plan.

     

    • nightly images. If they are moved "somewhere back", we solved the other half of the problem. We already added lot's of warnings and we can add them more to the download page. Do we really need nightly images? If not, let's cut them down to minimum and focus to beta images, images build a week before major release? This way the testing protocol get's somehow simplified - there will be no question "where is the image which i need to test" -> "test last image from download", little less confusions, than using nightly images. 
    • support. If we already dropped the idea of commercial support, we could at least limit it to validated users / images and provide commercial support - as option. Since this is not mandatory it's more like a yet another donate button, but can help funding the project. Some cash will always be needed. This way we also cut off supporting 3rd party builders, which they have to take care of support on their own.
    • config files and download page for unsupported / old creations. There were few ideas exposed, but I have some doubts on implementation. Build script .unsupported is good, but for download page I am not sure. Two examples - I would like to add new board to download page, we want users to try out and to see that we started to work on, but we don't provide end user support and on the other end we have some exotic board, which we want to move out from download page. We have one on without support and one off without support. This way?

     

    Quote

    doing only stupid support jobs in the forum, no more fun developing stuff


    We need to limit support. Agree, but how not to make damage?

     

    My personal involvements are going above fun stuff sometimes - bigger the project, more comm and more coordinating. This can be fun, but it's usually dealing with people, where no schematics is available :D 

     

    Just saying.

     

    Quote

    There's no one except Igor who could define rules

     

    I can take veto, where and if needed, but I would prefer not to play part in every decision process, which is/will be going on. If core decision / active group expands more, than we might need to think about changing rules again. So far - in a small group - exposing a problem, talking about and making consensus is the way to go. IMHO Areas, where we all know what to do, we anyway do and no talk is needed. Here, probably we don't have unified standpoints and we shall clear them out, before any action is taken and resources wasted. Yes.
     

    Quote

     but as resources are not endless and one huge problem of every OSS-Project is to attract new developer and so MythBuntu died

     

    I understand your concern, but usually there are many reasons involved. In any case, we are developing and attracting people, but the speed of overall development and users is faster / bigger.

  7. No NEXT (which can be identified / understand as stable kernel 4.x branch) for H3, while this situation already happened for older chips: A10 / A20 and Odroid XU4, Imx6.

     

    Nightly images are not directly related. There will always be some development branches ... DEV will remain.

  8. - default means old legacy kernel. Pretty much works, but ofc no docker support since kernel is too old.

    - nightly indicates automated builds with whatever kernel

    - we usually don't provide "DEV" images. Usually they are in nightly builds or you can made them manually

    - in build higher than 5.27 (current betas) is it possible to switch kernels from armbian-config menu. So you don't need to worry about ... 

    - default will stay default for ever or at least for some time. DEV will become NEXT which indicates "Next kernel generation"

  9. 2 minutes ago, jethro said:

    What would be the recommended way of getting a Docker compatible kernel? I.e. safest path for most vanilla, repeatable, process, facilitating future upgrade?


    You are using the most compatible kernel. This "DEV" will once become "NEXT" and that will indicate that we are satisfied with quality. That kernel updates will be from stable branches, currently they are not.

  10. 8 hours ago, t-bob said:

     

    Igor, yes i understand that they are very beta but I wasnt sure if it was a me issue or one that effected everyone. So far I have experienced only small issues which is really nice. armbian is pretty dang good !!!

     

    I have found several other issues/'features' ... do i post them here or is there somewhere else to log them ?

     

    I wouldnt mind having having the hamradio stuff setup in the kernel as a default ... with whom do i speak with about that ?

     


    Thank you :)

    I used to operate in hamradio field back in the old days, but I have no idea about current needs in kernel. If you provide a list of options (open a new issue at Github), we can include them in no time. Like this one. The same goes for other options you might miss in the kernel.

  11. 46 minutes ago, jernej said:

    I think that H3 will get DRM HDMI/TVE driver in 4.13 and Icenowy already tested mali driver (x11 version), which works. So it is not so distant future, but it will take some months for sure.

     

    That's good news. I heard stories, but didn't know, that we are that close. Thanks for update.

  12. Quote

    how long has the dev branch supported docker (i.e. 2 weeks or 6 months)?


    We start to implement Docker in late 2015. I would not worry about that, but dev branch has still some low level glitches.

     

    4 hours ago, jethro said:

    - any known issues with the dev branch beyond 3d rendering / audio (my application is headless so that's ok)


    There will be no 3D rendering in mainline kernel for next few years / never, perhaps someday in 3rd party branch. Audio works.

     

    4 hours ago, jethro said:

    any idea when a stable mainline build will be available for the OPIPlus 2E?


    It's stable enough, but I won't use it in production at this stage yet. Or at least do severe testing on your app, before deployment. Few months. But not withing main line exactly (www.kernel.org), since support there is still minimal, development branches within Armbian.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Guidelines