Jump to content

Switching SUNXI-DEV to 5.5.y

dolphs

By dolphs
in Advanced users - Development

 Share

Recommended Posts

dolphs

dolphs

Posted
Posted

While 5.4.y is not in ( sunxi64_common.inc ) current yet, at this time of writing I like to explore  " KERNELBRANCH="branch:orange-pi-5.5" ".

Except for just updating to this branch, I noticed it is just too early as megous github branch is not prepared yet for 5.5-RC1.

I am curious to see if any of these have been applied already and what new fun stuff needs to be considered in the kernel .config

Igor

Igor

Posted
Posted

If you like to explore, just do it. If something doesn't work or if patches are not applying well - which is expected - dig in and fix them.

Werner

Werner

Posted
Posted

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/diff/?id=v5.5-rc1&id2=v5.4&dt=2

Check this for changes compared to 5.4

 

Examples for things you can find:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=2fabf6dd77014f19d45fc71c01f1b073c03df255

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=46b257b1852fccdc4edaf4bbc6fdb59be0b94f0d

dolphs

dolphs

Posted
  • Author
Posted

First attempt (5.5-rc2), thanks to @megi who added rc2 to the 5.5-branch

 

This build resulted in compile errors at once, which was to be expected.

Just reporting here in case DEV will be switched to 5.5 this month.

The log attached holds "duplicate_label" as "well duplicate_node_names"-errors.

compilation.log

Igor

Igor

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, dolphs said:

Just reporting here in case DEV will be switched to 5.5 this month.

 

It will 100% not unless you will do the job of adjusting and clearing patches.

Werner

Werner

Posted
Posted
On 12/16/2019 at 9:55 AM, dolphs said:

compilation.log 2.97 kB · 7 downloads

Probably some patches are new obsolete since their content has been merged into mainline. Though they getting applied anyways which results in duplicate note errors. Same procedure as every time when a new kernel is released.

Try to find the unneeded patches and disable them.

martinayotte

martinayotte

Posted
Posted

I've committed the sunxi-dev switch to 5.5.y !

The only patches that I didn't took time to fix, so I've disabled them, are :


  

0128-drm-bridge-extract-some-Analogix-I2C-DP-common-code.patch-disabled
0130-drm-bridge-Add-Analogix-anx6345-support.patch-disabled
v3-1-2-si2168-Set-TS-clock-mode-and-frequency.patch-disabled
v3-2-2-dvbsky-Add-support-for-MyGica-T230C-v2.patch-disabled

But I will try again later ...

1
Werner

Werner

Posted
Posted

aufs5-standalone.patch fails to apply to the sources and therefore the build fails obviously. I will retry without AuFS.

 

Edit: Yep, works.

guidol

guidol

Posted
Posted
17 hours ago, martinayotte said:

I've committed the sunxi-dev switch to 5.5.y !

"only" sunxi-dev or also sunxi64-dev? ;) 

guidol

guidol

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, martinayotte said:

Both ! :P

I still have to test some boards but 75% of my garden is now on 5.5.0-rc2 ...

My sunxi64-dev SBCs (3x NPI Neo2 + NPi A64)  does startup fine:
  

Neo2:
Welcome to Armbian Buster with Linux 5.5.0-rc2-sunxi64
package bsp-kernel[19.11.5] u-boot[19.11.5] dtb[19.11.5] firmware[19.11.5] config[19.11.5]
branch[dev]

A64:
Welcome to Debian Buster with Armbian Linux 5.5.0-rc2-sunxi64
package bsp-kernel[19.11.5] u-boot[19.11.5] dtb[19.11.3] firmware[19.11.5] config[19.11.5]
branch[dev]

Thanks :)
Now I could start to compile for sunxi-dev ;) 

Igor

Igor

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, Werner said:

aufs5-standalone.patch fails to apply to the sources and therefore the build fails obviously.


Its expected to fail.

 

It would be probably best to add AUFS="no" here:
https://github.com/armbian/build/blob/master/config/sources/families/include/sunxi64_common.inc#L30

or even to 
https://github.com/armbian/build/blob/master/config/sources/arm64.conf
under if $BRANCH = dev

Werner

Werner

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, Igor said:


Its expected to fail.

 

 

Of course I did not expect everything works out of the box. Though I wanted to mention it anyways ;).

guidol

guidol

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, Werner said:

Of course I did not expect everything works out of the box. Though I wanted to mention it anyways ;).

I did compile with  

./compile.sh EXPERT=yes WIREGUARD=no AUFS=no BUILD_KSRC=no

and it did also work for for my non-64Bit-sunxi SBCs OPi Zero, OPi One and my BPi M2 Berry ;)

At this time I have no need for WireGuard.

1
Igor

Igor

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Werner said:

Though I wanted to mention it anyways ;).


Yes, I know. Thanks!

I only proposed to by default disable advanced features such as AUFS, WG, BUILD_KSRC perhaps even WIFI on DEV branches since they - in many cases - fail to build, build longer and its unnecessary trouble in development / testing stage.

martinayotte

martinayotte

Posted
Posted
On 12/28/2019 at 6:01 AM, Werner said:

aufs5-standalone.patch fails to apply to the sources

If I remember, it was already broken in 5.4 ...

3 hours ago, guidol said:

WIREGUARD=no AUFS=no

That is what I'm doing since months ...

Igor

Igor

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, martinayotte said:

it was already broken in 5.4 ...

 

Yes, it was only fixed few days ago by the AUFS maintainer.

Igor

Igor

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, martinayotte said:

So, no more needs to default it to "no" ?

 

5.4.y is supported, while for 5.5.y I didn't tried it yet.

Werner

Werner

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, guidol said:

I did compile with  


./compile.sh EXPERT=yes WIREGUARD=no AUFS=no BUILD_KSRC=no

and it did also work for for my non-64Bit-sunxi SBCs OPi Zero, OPi One and my BPi M2 Berry ;)

At this time I have no need for WireGuard.

Wireguard seems to work in 5.5.0-rc2. It compiled at least. 

  LD [M]  drivers/net/wireguard/wireguard.ko
  LD [M]  net/wireguard/wireguard.ko
  INSTALL drivers/net/wireguard/wireguard.ko
  INSTALL net/wireguard/wireguard.ko

 

Werner

Werner

Posted
Posted

Looking decent. 

  ___  ____  _    ___
 / _ \|  _ \(_)  / _ \ _ __   ___
| | | | |_) | | | | | | '_ \ / _ \
| |_| |  __/| | | |_| | | | |  __/
 \___/|_|   |_|  \___/|_| |_|\___|

Welcome to Armbian Buster with Linux 5.5.0-rc2-sunxi
[...]
root@honeypot:~# lsmod
Module                  Size  Used by
wireguard              57344  0

 

 

Edit: OPi0+ looking good too. 

  ___  ____  _   _____                ____  _
 / _ \|  _ \(_) |__  /___ _ __ ___   |  _ \| |_   _ ___
| | | | |_) | |   / // _ \ '__/ _ \  | |_) | | | | / __|
| |_| |  __/| |  / /|  __/ | | (_) | |  __/| | |_| \__ \
 \___/|_|   |_| /____\___|_|  \___/  |_|   |_|\__,_|___/

Welcome to Armbian buster with Linux 5.5.0-rc2-sunxi64

Though CPU is capped to 1.01GHz while the H5 should work at 1.2GHz.

Found this: 

[    6.037059] core: _opp_supported_by_regulators: OPP minuV: 1320000 maxuV: 1320000, not supported by regulator
[    6.037083] cpu cpu0: _opp_add: OPP not supported by regulators (1104000000)
[    6.037167] core: _opp_supported_by_regulators: OPP minuV: 1320000 maxuV: 1320000, not supported by regulator
[    6.037174] cpu cpu0: _opp_add: OPP not supported by regulators (1200000000)
[    6.037301] core: _opp_supported_by_regulators: OPP minuV: 1340000 maxuV: 1340000, not supported by regulator
[    6.037309] cpu cpu0: _opp_add: OPP not supported by regulators (1296000000)
[    6.037392] core: _opp_supported_by_regulators: OPP minuV: 1400000 maxuV: 1400000, not supported by regulator
[    6.037400] cpu cpu0: _opp_add: OPP not supported by regulators (1368000000)

Maybe something missing in the dts?

1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Guidelines

  I accept