1 1
dolphs

Switching SUNXI-DEV to 5.5.y

Recommended Posts

While 5.4.y is not in ( sunxi64_common.inc ) current yet, at this time of writing I like to explore  " KERNELBRANCH="branch:orange-pi-5.5" ".

Except for just updating to this branch, I noticed it is just too early as megous github branch is not prepared yet for 5.5-RC1.

I am curious to see if any of these have been applied already and what new fun stuff needs to be considered in the kernel .config

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you like to explore, just do it. If something doesn't work or if patches are not applying well - which is expected - dig in and fix them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First attempt (5.5-rc2), thanks to @megi who added rc2 to the 5.5-branch

 

This build resulted in compile errors at once, which was to be expected.

Just reporting here in case DEV will be switched to 5.5 this month.

The log attached holds "duplicate_label" as "well duplicate_node_names"-errors.

compilation.log

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, dolphs said:

Just reporting here in case DEV will be switched to 5.5 this month.

 

It will 100% not unless you will do the job of adjusting and clearing patches.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/16/2019 at 9:55 AM, dolphs said:

Probably some patches are new obsolete since their content has been merged into mainline. Though they getting applied anyways which results in duplicate note errors. Same procedure as every time when a new kernel is released.

Try to find the unneeded patches and disable them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've committed the sunxi-dev switch to 5.5.y !

The only patches that I didn't took time to fix, so I've disabled them, are :


 

0128-drm-bridge-extract-some-Analogix-I2C-DP-common-code.patch-disabled
0130-drm-bridge-Add-Analogix-anx6345-support.patch-disabled
v3-1-2-si2168-Set-TS-clock-mode-and-frequency.patch-disabled
v3-2-2-dvbsky-Add-support-for-MyGica-T230C-v2.patch-disabled

But I will try again later ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, martinayotte said:

Both ! :P

I still have to test some boards but 75% of my garden is now on 5.5.0-rc2 ...

My sunxi64-dev SBCs (3x NPI Neo2 + NPi A64)  does startup fine:
 

Neo2:
Welcome to Armbian Buster with Linux 5.5.0-rc2-sunxi64
package bsp-kernel[19.11.5] u-boot[19.11.5] dtb[19.11.5] firmware[19.11.5] config[19.11.5]
branch[dev]

A64:
Welcome to Debian Buster with Armbian Linux 5.5.0-rc2-sunxi64
package bsp-kernel[19.11.5] u-boot[19.11.5] dtb[19.11.3] firmware[19.11.5] config[19.11.5]
branch[dev]

Thanks :)
Now I could start to compile for sunxi-dev ;) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Werner said:

aufs5-standalone.patch fails to apply to the sources and therefore the build fails obviously.


Its expected to fail.

 

It would be probably best to add AUFS="no" here:
https://github.com/armbian/build/blob/master/config/sources/families/include/sunxi64_common.inc#L30

or even to 
https://github.com/armbian/build/blob/master/config/sources/arm64.conf
under if $BRANCH = dev

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Igor said:


Its expected to fail.

 

 

Of course I did not expect everything works out of the box. Though I wanted to mention it anyways ;).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Werner said:

Of course I did not expect everything works out of the box. Though I wanted to mention it anyways ;).

I did compile with 

./compile.sh EXPERT=yes WIREGUARD=no AUFS=no BUILD_KSRC=no

and it did also work for for my non-64Bit-sunxi SBCs OPi Zero, OPi One and my BPi M2 Berry ;)

At this time I have no need for WireGuard.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Werner said:

Though I wanted to mention it anyways ;).


Yes, I know. Thanks!

I only proposed to by default disable advanced features such as AUFS, WG, BUILD_KSRC perhaps even WIFI on DEV branches since they - in many cases - fail to build, build longer and its unnecessary trouble in development / testing stage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/28/2019 at 6:01 AM, Werner said:

aufs5-standalone.patch fails to apply to the sources

If I remember, it was already broken in 5.4 ...

3 hours ago, guidol said:

WIREGUARD=no AUFS=no

That is what I'm doing since months ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, guidol said:

I did compile with 


./compile.sh EXPERT=yes WIREGUARD=no AUFS=no BUILD_KSRC=no

and it did also work for for my non-64Bit-sunxi SBCs OPi Zero, OPi One and my BPi M2 Berry ;)

At this time I have no need for WireGuard.

Wireguard seems to work in 5.5.0-rc2. It compiled at least.

  LD [M]  drivers/net/wireguard/wireguard.ko
  LD [M]  net/wireguard/wireguard.ko
  INSTALL drivers/net/wireguard/wireguard.ko
  INSTALL net/wireguard/wireguard.ko

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking decent.

  ___  ____  _    ___
 / _ \|  _ \(_)  / _ \ _ __   ___
| | | | |_) | | | | | | '_ \ / _ \
| |_| |  __/| | | |_| | | | |  __/
 \___/|_|   |_|  \___/|_| |_|\___|

Welcome to Armbian Buster with Linux 5.5.0-rc2-sunxi
[...]
root@honeypot:~# lsmod
Module                  Size  Used by
wireguard              57344  0

 

 

Edit: OPi0+ looking good too.

  ___  ____  _   _____                ____  _
 / _ \|  _ \(_) |__  /___ _ __ ___   |  _ \| |_   _ ___
| | | | |_) | |   / // _ \ '__/ _ \  | |_) | | | | / __|
| |_| |  __/| |  / /|  __/ | | (_) | |  __/| | |_| \__ \
 \___/|_|   |_| /____\___|_|  \___/  |_|   |_|\__,_|___/

Welcome to Armbian buster with Linux 5.5.0-rc2-sunxi64

Though CPU is capped to 1.01GHz while the H5 should work at 1.2GHz.

Found this:

[    6.037059] core: _opp_supported_by_regulators: OPP minuV: 1320000 maxuV: 1320000, not supported by regulator
[    6.037083] cpu cpu0: _opp_add: OPP not supported by regulators (1104000000)
[    6.037167] core: _opp_supported_by_regulators: OPP minuV: 1320000 maxuV: 1320000, not supported by regulator
[    6.037174] cpu cpu0: _opp_add: OPP not supported by regulators (1200000000)
[    6.037301] core: _opp_supported_by_regulators: OPP minuV: 1340000 maxuV: 1340000, not supported by regulator
[    6.037309] cpu cpu0: _opp_add: OPP not supported by regulators (1296000000)
[    6.037392] core: _opp_supported_by_regulators: OPP minuV: 1400000 maxuV: 1400000, not supported by regulator
[    6.037400] cpu cpu0: _opp_add: OPP not supported by regulators (1368000000)

Maybe something missing in the dts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
1 1