rvalle Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 Hi! I am looking into OdroidM1 network performance with kernel 6.6.47-current-rockchip64 ( 24.8.1 ) For some reason network performance is x10 faster (upstream) in bookworm and noble, when compared to jammy. Downstream performance is fine, delivering the same performance in jammy and the other distributions. Since all of them are using the same kernel, I assume that there must be some configuration that jammy is missing, or? Any idea about what could be going on? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rvalle Posted September 12 Author Share Posted September 12 @Igor , thanks for your comment: Quote Jammy, Noble, Bookworm ... are not different in this. Pay attention to kernel version. Its a known regression, also found on official Hardkernel images. No solution yet. I am getting some variation, but perhaps all of them are degraded anyway. While I wait for the upstream fix, is it possible to build armbian on the last working kernel version? How would that go? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rvalle Posted September 14 Author Share Posted September 14 @Igor this recent fix seems like it: https://lore.kernel.org/all/E1sbJvd-001rGD-E3@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk/#r apparently the driver was decoding the duplex mode incorrectly. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usual user Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 1 hour ago, rvalle said: this recent fix seems like it Allready landed in mainline, you get the fix out-of-the-box since v6.11-rc3. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Igor Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 4 hours ago, rvalle said: this recent fix seems like it If patch was not back-ported already by kernel.org to stable branches, pull them into CURRENT and EDGE with a patch and we can ship an update right away: https://github.com/armbian/build/tree/main/patch/kernel/archive/rockchip64-6.10 https://github.com/armbian/build/tree/main/patch/kernel/archive/rockchip64-6.6 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Igor Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 Before: [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 63.5 MBytes 532 Mbits/sec 250 22.6 KBytes [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 71.2 MBytes 598 Mbits/sec 234 21.2 KBytes [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 68.6 MBytes 576 Mbits/sec 246 25.5 KBytes [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 68.5 MBytes 575 Mbits/sec 250 26.9 KBytes [ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 68.6 MBytes 576 Mbits/sec 243 18.4 KBytes [ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 67.9 MBytes 570 Mbits/sec 252 29.7 KBytes [ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 68.9 MBytes 577 Mbits/sec 248 28.3 KBytes [ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 67.2 MBytes 564 Mbits/sec 250 28.3 KBytes [ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 70.1 MBytes 589 Mbits/sec 242 15.6 KBytes [ 5] 9.00-10.01 sec 69.8 MBytes 580 Mbits/sec 243 19.8 KBytes After: [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 87.4 MBytes 732 Mbits/sec 143 24.0 KBytes [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 92.1 MBytes 773 Mbits/sec 153 65.0 KBytes [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 89.1 MBytes 748 Mbits/sec 165 39.6 KBytes [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 89.2 MBytes 749 Mbits/sec 167 31.1 KBytes [ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 85.8 MBytes 719 Mbits/sec 180 38.2 KBytes [ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 88.6 MBytes 743 Mbits/sec 173 12.7 KBytes [ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 88.4 MBytes 741 Mbits/sec 171 59.4 KBytes [ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 89.9 MBytes 754 Mbits/sec 158 28.3 KBytes [ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 89.0 MBytes 747 Mbits/sec 164 21.2 KBytes [ 5] 9.00-10.01 sec 87.6 MBytes 729 Mbits/sec 182 39.6 KByte 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solution Igor Posted September 14 Solution Share Posted September 14 Made a PR https://github.com/armbian/build/pull/7245 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rvalle Posted September 15 Author Share Posted September 15 If patch was not back-ported already by kernel.org to stable branches, pull them into CURRENT and EDGE with a patch and we can ship an update right away: https://github.com/armbian/build/tree/main/patch/kernel/archive/rockchip64-6.10 https://github.com/armbian/build/tree/main/patch/kernel/archive/rockchip64-6.6Sorry, have never done this... Will check how you did.Sent from my 2201116SG using Tapatalk 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rvalle Posted September 15 Author Share Posted September 15 Made a PR https://github.com/armbian/build/pull/7245Nice!Sent from my 2201116SG using Tapatalk 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rvalle Posted September 17 Author Share Posted September 17 On 9/14/2024 at 6:45 PM, Igor said: pull them into CURRENT and EDGE with a patch and we can ship an update right away: @Igor I am trying to understand the publishing method. How are patches turned into updates? I guess updates are pushed from armbian-firmware repo, or? But I cant see the relationship between the builder and the firmware repos.... You mentions updates go out right away. how does it work? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Werner Posted September 17 Share Posted September 17 Updates are published via our own apt repository. Those packages are generated with the same build framework you can find on Github plus some additional scripts which are there as well (probably in a different repo though). Maintainers can trigger an update to publish a new kernel version so end-users can update with a simple apt upgrade. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Igor Posted September 17 Share Posted September 17 1. Script build all changed packages every 4 hours or manually in-between: https://github.com/armbian/os/actions/workflows/complete-artifact-matrix-all.yml 2. If this is successful repository rebuild follows (rolling and stable) https://github.com/armbian/os/actions/workflows/repository-update.yml 3. Once finished, packages are pushed to rolling release repository http://beta.armbian.com (which is stable enough for this hardware and most of end users). As kernel covers many devices, pushing to default stable repo https://apt.armbian.com happens manually after observing this https://github.com/armbian/os?tab=readme-ov-file#latest-smoke-tests-results None of other distributions or distributions provided by vendors have this kind of quality control. Sadly, not even this is enough, but better we can't afford. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rvalle Posted September 18 Author Share Posted September 18 On 9/17/2024 at 11:30 AM, Igor said: None of other distributions or distributions provided by vendors have this kind of quality control. Sadly, not even this is enough, but better we can't afford. I agree, yes. It is very nice and Agile. I can see the new kernel release .51 in beta apt repo. Will test it in the environment I saw the problems. R. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.