guidol

When you got if solved via the gnome-Terminal its sound you used a X/Desktop. console-setup does only change the console at boot before the desktop-manager

What kind of files did you transfer? Many small files or one big file? For not getting to much overhead with small files I do test with the image-files of armbian or other distros (.ISO) I have to test it with the NanpPi Neo2 NAS (will post results later) - but with my Synology-NAS I do get up to 75MB/second on uncompressed Image-Files.

Maybe the network is running 100MBit or a bad 1000MBit?

are you using a armbian-Linux? https://www.armbian.com/orange-pi-one/ For the Orange Pi One there is only a legacy kernel 3.x and you got 4.11.12 h3disp isnt available in othe linux distros - I think.

Thats sounds exactly like the problem on the Duo - maybe this patch is missing or has be longer on the Duo?

@Igor I changed from ondemand to interactive or performance in /etc/default/cpufrequtils but after a reboot there is no difference. First Sound is cut, second command after 3-5 seconds is OK but when the command is started 7-10 seconds after the first audio is cut again. and this on the actual ARMBIAN 5.34.171111 nightly Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) 4.13.12-sunxi After 5-7 seconds I can hear a low noise like "click" - sound like shuting down the ampfiler. So from espeak -s145 "Hello, how are you today"?" you will get only the "are you today?" in the first try while getting the fill text when using the same command 3-5 seconds after the first one. This is for "espeak TTS". While using Internetradio with mpg123/mplayer there is a continuous audio-stream without problems because of no audio-break. @zador.blood.stained How can I check if I do use the patched driver?

For me - on my Duo -it looks like there is some energy-saving-management at the audio-out. when some seconds the audio isnt used it seems to shutdown the amplifier Did hear that problem while using espeak TTS, where the first word are missing on th first command....on the second command all word could be heard.... but after some seonds the same did appear to the sound output....

I found them on eBay now, but for 21,21EUR incl. postage: https://www.ebay.de/itm/Banana-Pi-BPI-M2-Zero-Board-Allwinner-H2-A7-Quad-core-512M-W-WIFI-Bluetooth/253249024998

NanoPi Air Webpage ( http://www.friendlyarm.com/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=151 ) show as eMMC: KLM8G1WEPD-B031 ( http://www.samsung.com/semiconductor/products/flash-storage/emmc/KLM8G1WEPD-B031?ia=2324 )

I know not much more lighter than a NanoPi Neo..... only a AcmeSystems Arietta G25 ( https://www.acmesystems.it/arietta ), a NodeMCU 8266 or a VoCore2 ( http://vocore.io/ )

Thats right...they are from Sven Kayser...I asked him now on Facebook about the pictures. [EDIT] He did say: Please do.

Yes - as I can see for booting from sd.... Installation seems to be possible, but why does the user dd from device /dev/zero to /dev/mmcblk0 after the emmc installtion? The process complete and I launch the "dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/mmcblk0 bs=1024 seek=8 count=1" command directly after. The system does not boot anymore with and without the SD inserted. wouldnt a emtpy mmcblk0 bad for booting? where did he get this command?

for getting it back to life - did you try the eflasher images from FriendlyElec/FriendlyARM?: http://wiki.friendlyarm.com/wiki/index.php/NanoPi_M1_Plus#Flash_image_to_eMMC_with_eflasher If that didnt work you could ask for the u-boot parameters in the FriendlyARM-Forum at NanoPi M1/Plus,NanoPi NEO/Air/NEO2/NEO Plus2 Hardware http://www.friendlyarm.com/Forum/viewforum.php?f=47 Maybe someone could help you getting your board back to life/booting.

Yes - for sure - if it do help with the Fake-6.0.1 Android...its inly a Kitkat 4.4 - so no KODI 17.5 - only KODI 16.1 Her are pictures from @tkaiser - maybe you can use them also? what did you say Thomas?

I dont expect real quality, but I want to check if it is the ethernet-port or the streaming-app or the driver for ethernet of the os. The "dirty cheap" Orange Pi Zero (with Expansion PCB) is streaming Internet-Radio without problems and has also a Allwinner-SoC.

Its not about people or being personally - but about finding solutions for problems.... So I found these quotes better: Coming together is a beginning; keeping together is progress; working together is success. [Henry Ford] or Let's not forget it's you and me vs. the problem... NOT you vs. me. [Steve Maraboli]

here V2.0 - but only viewable. not downloadable without account https://de.scribd.com/document/237650383/PCI-Express-Mini-CEM-2-0-pdf But the Pinout is already in the Wikipedia: ( pins 36/38 on mPCIe compliant devices carry the USB2 data lines ) https://www.crypt.space/freewiki/?query=mini PCI Express &lang=de

I also got a little heatsink on top of the cpu of my OrangePi R1- but i would like to see a picture of your passive solution

if the costs are rising to fast - how about installing a standard-eMMC socket like on the ODROID C2 or inside the Pinebook? I think this would cost only a few cents? For me that would be fine - then while I upgraded my Pinebook to 32GB eMMC I could use the old 16Gb eMMC on my ODROID C2 AND if the market will supply faster/bigger eMMC modules I can swap out the slower/smaller against a faster/bigger one

Mine isnt commented out (but one of the last via /etc/network/interfaces - now using nmtui since debian stretch): root@nanopiduo:~# more /etc/network/interfaces source /etc/network/interfaces.d/* # Wired adapter #1 # allow-hotplug eth0 # no-auto-down eth0 # iface eth0 inet dhcp auto eth0 iface eth0 inet static address 192.168.6.113 netmask 255.255.255.0 gateway 192.168.6.1 dns-nameservers 192.168.6.3 192.168.6.3 is my own DNS-Server because Iam using pi-hole https://pi-hole.net/

then it would be better like on the NanoPi Duo with PCIe-SSD....booting from uSD and using / root on the PCIe: https://www.cnx-software.com/2017/10/30/nanopi-duo-quick-start-guide-ubuntu-breadboard-mini-shield-msata-ssd/#nanopi-duo-with-mini-shield-and-ssd Its a shame for the eMMC (also if they could read up to 130MB/sec)

As price idea: A H3 NanoPi Neo does cost $7,99 (256MB version) plus $2 if 512MB Ram =$9,99 A H3 NanoPi Neo Air does cost $19,99 and has WiFi (no ethernet) but also has 8GB eMMC A H3 NanoPi Neo Air with 32GB eMMC does cost $35 (+ $15,01 on top to the normal NanoPi Neo Air). So for the 8GB a bit more than a uSD of 8GB, but for me thats OK, because eMMC should be faster and has to be soldered by the company

I think nobody has a complete "perfect" product....neither "Orange Pi" nor "Banana Pi" nor "Nano Pi" nor "Raspberry Pi". Every product has some details that could be better (lower heat, better documentation, better linux-images, better cases, less binary blobs). So I got some of every sort But - I personally - like the wiki from FriendlyElec/FriendlyARM at http://wiki.friendlyarm.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page Most - NOT ALL - pages does include very interesting and valuable informations for me (PinOuts and HowTos, FAQ). OK some should be more actual - but there are many pages for many diffrent models and if ne page hasnt the information then I could find mostly the information at a page of a other model. The downside - their forum seems mostly supported from users to users. No technican seem to take a look here on a daily basis

Yes - your system could ping 8.8.8.8 over 30 times. So connection to the internet s there - but without DNS-resolving. You could try to ping a DNS-Name like: ping armbian.com No - thats OK to have more than one DNS-Server but you could configure them with one line (one space between the IPs): dns-nameservers 8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4

the force didnt seem to break it was no problem, because it was my "old" 8GB Class6 uSD - and in the meantime I installed it on a 16GB Class 10 SanDisk uSD But there is no big difference to the new u-boot which did idle at 57-59 degree (also Grad Celsius ). While running armbianmonitor -m I did press the finger at the heatsink....no problem. But without the finger it raise again up: root@orangepi:~# armbianmonitor -m Stop monitoring using [ctrl]-[c] Time CPU load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq CPU C.St. 20:02:21: 912MHz 0.00 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 57°C 0/7 20:02:26: 240MHz 0.00 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 58°C 0/7 20:02:31: 240MHz 0.00 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 57°C 0/7 20:02:36: 240MHz 0.00 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 57°C 0/7 20:02:42: 240MHz 0.00 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 56°C 0/7 20:02:47: 240MHz 0.00 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 56°C 0/7 20:02:52: 240MHz 0.00 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 56°C 0/7 20:02:57: 240MHz 0.08 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 57°C 0/7 20:03:03: 240MHz 0.07 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 57°C 0/7 20:03:08: 240MHz 0.06 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 56°C 0/7 20:03:13: 912MHz 0.06 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 55°C 0/7 20:03:18: 240MHz 0.05 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 54°C 0/7 20:03:24: 240MHz 0.05 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 53°C 0/7 20:03:29: 240MHz 0.05 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 53°C 0/7 Time CPU load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq CPU C.St. 20:03:34: 240MHz 0.04 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 51°C 0/7 20:03:39: 240MHz 0.04 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 52°C 0/7 20:03:45: 240MHz 0.04 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 51°C 0/7 20:03:50: 240MHz 0.03 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 51°C 0/7 20:03:55: 240MHz 0.03 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 50°C 0/7 20:04:01: 240MHz 0.03 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 51°C 0/7 20:04:06: 240MHz 0.03 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 52°C 0/7 20:04:11: 240MHz 0.02 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 52°C 0/7 20:04:16: 240MHz 0.02 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 54°C 0/7 20:04:22: 240MHz 0.02 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 53°C 0/7 20:04:27: 240MHz 0.02 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 54°C 0/7 20:04:32: 240MHz 0.02 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 52°C 0/7 20:04:37: 240MHz 0.02 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 54°C 0/7 20:04:43: 240MHz 0.09 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 53°C 0/7 20:04:48: 240MHz 0.08 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 54°C 0/7 Time CPU load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq CPU C.St. 20:04:53: 240MHz 0.07 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 53°C 0/7 20:04:59: 240MHz 0.07 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 54°C 0/7 20:05:04: 240MHz 0.06 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 53°C 0/7