Fail to fetch files

[Technicavolous]

For some days now I get the following error trying to build C4 images.

 

 

I attempted the --fix-missing, apt update apt upgrade etc, still this after some time in compilation.

Running in a Virtualbox direct session, no Vagrant or the like. Had been working fine for quite some time, went a few weeks and decided to rebuild and got this error.

Is it trying to download from my own machine? 

 

What to do?

[Igor]

12 minutes ago, Technicavolous said:

What to do?

It's Ubuntu's infrastructure / repository error. Try again?

[Werner]

Not necessarily. My guess is an issue with aptly. Try purging and retry.

[Igor]

1 minute ago, Werner said:

My guess is an issue with aptly.

You mean with apt-catcher? Perhaps, but unlikely ... aptly is not in function here.

[martinayotte]

It seems to be a simple network timeout, since the file seem to be present on this server...

[Technicavolous]

so

apt purge (that package name) ? 

 

Always on the same filename. Will try purge tonight when I get back.  Data package resets on the 18th, if it isn't fixed by then I'll start over with a new clone from github.

[Technicavolous]

6 hours ago, martinayotte said:

It seems to be a simple network timeout, since the file seem to be present on this server...

I'm on a metered nbIoT connection so I'm used to timeouts - usually just restart the build and it picks up from there. This is somehow different.

 

Is it trying to connect to 127.0.0.1 port 3142? Or is that reporting that localhost can't find it?

[lanefu]

sudo systemctl status apt-cacher-ng
sudo systemctl stop apt-cache-ng
sudo rm -rf /var/cache/apt-cacher-ng/*
sudo systemctl start apt-cacher-ng
sudo systemctl status apt-cacher-ng

 

[Technicavolous]

ended up doing 

apt purge
apt autoremove

and it ran fine.  The only thing different was at the end I got a warning 

[ warn ] GPG signing skipped - no GPG_PASS [ Armbian_20.08.0-trunk_OdroidC4_focal_current_5.6.19_desktop.img ]

Not sure that's new, just noticed it this time ...

[Igor]

9 hours ago, Technicavolous said:

Not sure that's new, just noticed it this time ...

If you are not plan to sign with PGP and distribute those files, its safe to ignore.