Active threads

Been trying to enable multiple overlays on kernel 6.12 (orange pi 5) but I am not able to get any pwm device in /sys/class/pwm/ The i2c also seems to be missing. Is going back to 6.1 the safest option? Thanks

Armbian 24.5 works normally, but this issue occurs in versions 24.8, 25.5 and 25.8 [ 0.872698] dwhdmi-rockchip ff940000.hdmi: supply avdd-0v9 not found, using dummy regulator [ 0.872852] dwhdmi-rockchip ff940000.hdmi: supply avdd-1v8 not found, using dummy regulator [ 2.361552] dwhdmi-rockchip ff940000.hdmi: supply avdd-0v9 not found, using dummy regulator [ 2.361723] dwhdmi-rockchip ff940000.hdmi: supply avdd-1v8 not found, using dummy regulator [ 2.361912] dwhdmi-rockchip ff940000.hdmi: Detected HDMI TX controller v2.11a with HDCP (DWC HDMI 2.0 TX PHY) [ 2.363007] rockchip-drm display-subsystem: bound ff940000.hdmi (ops 0xffff80008120fe60) [ 22.444508] hdmi-audio-codec hdmi-audio-codec.8.auto: Only one simultaneous stream supported! [ 22.444524] hdmi-audio-codec hdmi-audio-codec.8.auto: ASoC: error at snd_soc_dai_startup on i2s-hifi: -22 [ 0.871390] rockchip-drm display-subsystem: bound ff8f0000.vop (ops 0xffff80008120b5e8) [ 0.872604] rockchip-drm display-subsystem: bound ff900000.vop (ops 0xffff80008120b5e8) [ 2.360057] rockchip-drm display-subsystem: bound ff8f0000.vop (ops 0xffff80008120b5e8) [ 2.361397] rockchip-drm display-subsystem: bound ff900000.vop (ops 0xffff80008120b5e8) [ 2.363007] rockchip-drm display-subsystem: bound ff940000.hdmi (ops 0xffff80008120fe60) [ 2.364674] [drm] Initialized rockchip 1.0.0 20140818 for display-subsystem on minor 0 [ 2.510919] rockchip-drm display-subsystem: [drm] fb0: rockchipdrmfb frame buffer device

Providing logs with armbianmonitor -u helps with troubleshooting and significantly raises chances that issue gets addressed.

I just did some new experiments, trying to get touch working in ili9488 LCD v2.1 Increasing or decreasing the SPI MHz in both the LCD and touch section of the DTS DONT WORK... I couldn't get touch working Next is to use a software defined SPI with spi-gpio (based on my experience in my ili9341 thread)

And could you tell me how to add a patch to my .dtb or .dts file. I installed linux-headers but I don't know what to do next with the patch posted above by c0rnelius.

I was having some trouble with newer ili9488 LCD v2.1, and I didn't have ili9488 LCD v1.1, so I decided to experiment again with ili9341 LCD v1.2. I found that this DTS https://forum.armbian.com/topic/44191-orangepi-zero-lts-ili9341-tft-lcd-and-later-orangepi-zero-3/#findComment-204672 Doesn't work with the touch chip. By accident, I ran the ili9488 driver on this ili9341, and I saw garbled graphics... but the good news: touch was working. Something in the ili9488 DTS which doesn't work for the ili9488 LCD, works for ili9341. I found the difference was not in the ads7846 section, but in the spi speed for the ili9xxx part. I switched back to the ili9341 DTS (with adafruit driver), but changed the SPI speed from 24MHZ to 40MHz.... then the ili9341 DTS was working with graphics and touch again ALTHOUGH the graphics have some flashing pseudo-colors in some places. Maybe the 40MHZ is too much, but I re-gained touch in ili9341 LCD v1.1. I will keep doing experiments. Playing with the SPI Mhz didn't help with the ili9488

Images were tested. Do you perhaps use Etcher for flashing? And try minimal image. That might even work with Etcher.

So I was able to reproduce the issue when trying to boot via NVMe after using armbian-config to switch from emmc. Using rkdeveloptool to flash the SPI with https://dl.radxa.com/rock5/sw/images/loader/rock-5b+/release/rock-5b+-spi-image-8ea7ee4-20240730.img (short guide in the spoiler) I was able to boot into the NVMe. Looking into fixing the broken SPI installation

Check here https://github.com/armbian/community/releases/tag/25.5.0-trunk.256 or on a mirror with archive https://docs.armbian.com/Mirrors/#current-mirrors for what you are looking for. We're aware that some links are broken for yet to be determined reason.

I think using the ubuntu keyserver is good as well but that this is a 'small' issue, it is easy to miss a small thing in a project this huge consider the number of boards, kernels, and distributions (including the different releases). if this little thing breaks, we can fix in our installed os using these methods.

moved

this soldering is visionally not very attractive 😛 , but at lest the result is what counts 👍

We don't deal with Android. Better check xda developers forums.

Description As per title How Has This Been Tested? [ ] hasn't Checklist: [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas [ ] My changes generate no new warnings [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules View the full article

Description This is a draft/wip for adding https proxy caching. This is especially designed for machines hosting lots of github runners to reduce their bandwidth usage by sacrificing disk space. http caching has been merged already and only needed minor changes. Caching https however is way more complicated. Encryption needs to be broken and rewrapped and then obviously downloads will fail due to cert issues. Classic MITM. So a new certificate authority (CA) needs to be put in place to allow these "fake" certs. Why is this even necessary? Well one major part is downloads from upstream apt repositories. The other major part is downloading 3rd party repositories and artifacts from OCI/ORAS/whatever the correct name for that system is. They do not allow plain http downloads but redirect to https. So in order to cache these encryption must be broken on the fly. On custom runs this works already with the mentioned extension. However when the build framework is used within a GH Actions Runner environment it would need to detect this and enable the extension automatically. No clue how to do that or overall if it is worth diving even deeper into this topic. Therefore this RFC to collect feedback. Also lots of fail-safe checks are missing. Sometimes I had to mix run_host_command_logged and chroot_sdcard since pipes don't work using latter. Documentation summary for feature / change Yes, this would need documentation. How Has This Been Tested? [x] custom builds with ENABLE_EXTENSION [ ] Test B Checklist: [no idea] My code follows the style guidelines of this project [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas [x] My changes generate no new warnings [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules View the full article

Description as per title How Has This Been Tested? [x] build [ ] nope, no hw on hand right now Checklist: [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas [x] My changes generate no new warnings [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules View the full article

Okay I will try that patch and the build switch that you mentioned. About the RAM: It is SKHynix 966.3MB(989480kB) https://linux-sunxi.org/File:A088_Board_Front_3.jpg I then tried an archived image for the cubieboard and so far no errors and runs quite stable: https://armbian.atomonetworks.com/archive/cubieboard/archive/ Is this a kernel issue then? Maybe I should compile with an older kernel. The stable one is 6.1.63 Thanks a lot for your continued support, Shivam

Hi, Tried this Opi5-Plus with kernel-6.15.2-edge-rockchip64 but mpv doesn't seems to have vpu hardware acceleration Does this repository works on RK3588 - Orange Pi 5 Plus Debian Trixie with mainline kernel 6.15.2-edge-rockchip64?

I think @amazingfate made a custom Chromium package at some point that included optimizations for rk35xx but no clue about its status. Might be even included in mesa-vpu extension? Firefox probably won't work since that would need adjustments as well and I think messing with browsers is a pita already. topics merged as duplicates.

I don't know. I don't have this board nor is the Armbian team aware of its state since it is community supported. This looks like some upstream (Debian to say) uboot package which certainly does not support this board. IIRC u-boot versions for rk3588, depending on family are something like 2017.09 or 2024.01 (both vendor cases) and 2025.01 or .04 for current/edge.

Same problem here, but enabling the audio codec on armbian-config was not sucessfull on this version: v25.5.1 for Orange Pi Zero running Armbian Linux 6.12.30-current-sunxi Any solution?

i need help too.... please

Hello, @sicxnull, Thanks for all your work on the H96X box. I'm trying to install Armbian on my x96q V5.1, your image (Armbian-unofficial_24.11.0-trunk_X96q-v5-1_bookworm_current_6.6.44_mate_desktop.img.xz) works great apart from I'd really like a server instead of desktop. I'm just wanting to use it for a VPN (Tailscale) exit node. Would it be hard to build a server version? I have no Linux experience.

I don't know what else to do... I usually research and learn on the go Search the 88xxau.c in your downloaded linux source. Try to find any link to documentation or github. Search 8812au in the respberry pi forum

Update maintainers and board status synced status from the database rename to .csc where we don't have anyone If you want to become a board maintainer, adjust data here. Ref: Board Maintainers Procedures and Guidelines Contribute View the full article