Igor

Yes, it does. But AFAIK only for selecting a correct board: https://docs.armbian.com/User-Guide_Armbian-Config/System/#select-odroid-board-configuration If you know what you are doing, no problem. That's why. And yes, you need to edit boot.ini. We had an idea to remove this Hardkernel proprietary configuration, but never managed to moved to modern boot loader. This HW is 10 years old, if someone wants to change this, else it will stay in this (a bit confusing) state. But it should work. Bigger problem is dying armhf architecture and complex suites such as OMV, might not be build-able anymore and there is nothing we can do about. Alternatively, one can use general tools like Samba / NFS for storage.

Via web: https://packages.ubuntu.com/ by checking dependencies https://packages.ubuntu.com/jammy-updates/zfsutils-linux and figuring out what is the next numbers. As its not always n+1 Askig AI: https://chatgpt.com/share/67e04381-7ecc-8005-b3c3-ade19c10e450

Yes. If you stay with Jammy, you are on old stable user-space, updated directly from Ubuntu, kernels from us. Packages on (old) stable base are rarely updated, usually only if some security problem is detected. If you want to have all packages updating, you need to use Plucky nightly build for your board - accessible at the bottom of download pages. There much more packages will be receiving updates, daily, but that also means bigger risk for running into troubles.

But you can step up and maintain this for everyone? We don't provide direct contact email, as we don't have capacity to deal with all packages that exists in open source world and as you discovered by yourself, some maintainers are not longer with us, so many packages doesn't really have anyone doing this. In our system - all you need to do is changing / bumping numbers and open PR. If build and test succeeds, someone with merge rights, merge it into the system and within few hours, packages are available on repository. PR: https://github.com/armbian/os/pull/300 Pool and test install was successful: https://github.com/armbian/os/actions/runs/14016836904/job/39243546741 Merge follows, packages will be out with next repo sync.

We had to gave up with maintaining this hardware so there is absolutely no warranty that it builds and boots. To verify if your build environment is operational, try to build some supported targets by using a switch ARTIFACT_IGNORE_CACHE=yes This will force recompilation and will tell you if everything is alright. Try with Raspberry Pi or any other supported target to see if things are right at your side.

By community is already supported for some time we even discussed option for official support in cooperation with its maker. We do that for their CB1. Which is Allwinner based, thus pretty different. As @Werner proposed, build is best, also there you can enable HA extension and build with preinstalled Home Assistant. We don't make stable pre-build images, but nighties are generating https://github.com/armbian/os/releases/

If its not in https://archive.armbian.com/, then we don't have it anymore.

If you are using kernel 6.12.y, perhaps related: https://www.armbian.com/newsflash/armbian-weekly-highlights-11/ -> https://github.com/armbian/build/commit/bf9ffa6eedd5df804e3f9a86c84e00607289cd59 which means fix just landed nightly builds.

https://docs.armbian.com/User-Guide_Armbian-Config/System/#install-alternative-kernels

Best recommendation is to drop vendor kernel and start using mainline derived (6.12.y at this point). Can be switched to (CURRENT) in armbian-config. Features that are missing are not much relevant for server setup. We are using RK3588 with mainline kernel in build farm for about a year (even with some development kernel). There ZFS will work without issues / the same as on x86 mainstream Linux distro. This kernel comes from https://github.com/armbian/linux-rockchip and might be very different then kernel.org

- reducing DRAM speed (u-boot) - reading this to get some ideas https://github.com/crust-firmware/crust (it was implemented into Armbian some time ago https://github.com/armbian/build/pulls?q=is%3Apr+crust+is%3Aclosed)

We are having an alias - probably bad move, removing: https://github.com/armbian/build/pull/7962

Single board computers are purpose oriented devices, where booting and using live OS is common. This is how installer was designed - you can boot and run OS from SD card. And move OS to internal memory at any moment - freshly & clean, after one year, never.

Please buy hardware we recommend. Thank you.

Its an old hardware and most popular board with this SoC was Orangepi Zero with which they share most of the problems. I think the only (small) difference related to the temperature is due to physical size and voltage regulation, which can be done differently as its an SoC outside component.

This should be fixed in 1h - i forgot to move latest images to the download area.

We have invested considerable effort in ensuring a seamless experience without relying on the proprietary Petitboot boot-loader. While our solution has the potential to support additional operating systems, our primary focus has been on achieving the current functionality. Expanding support for other OSes is certainly possible (similar as done by Petitboot), but it would require external contributions from users or third parties, as we will not be undertaking this development ourselves. However, we have no problems to merge it and provide it by default. We understand that certain features may be desirable, but the resources required to implement them have already been substantial. By supporting Hardkernel customers, we have already dedicated months of effort without any return. Additionally, it appears that DietPi may be repackaging an official Hardkernel Debian image rather than Armbian, or potentially a hybrid of both. If we were to develop full-featured support, there is a strong likelihood that DietPi would adopt and integrate our solution almost immediately. This is the way to go. It runs fine from USB without any Petitboot. And once you have our bootloader on SPI flash, you can directly flash Armbian to USB key and it should boot off directly. It is what it said. This occasionally occurs due to the complexity of maintaining our extensive mirroring infrastructure. Our goal is to ensure fast and reliable downloads and upgrades for users worldwide, minimizing issues related to slow speeds. It's unlikely. The kernel plays a crucial role in system functionality - if sound worked on one version, an upgrade (or different kernel) could potentially break it, which is a common occurrence. This is normal MO in open-source development.

apt-cache policy zfsutils-linux zfsutils-linux: Installed: 2.3.1-1arter97~ubuntu24.04.1 Candidate: 2.3.1-1arter97~ubuntu24.04.1 Version table: *** 2.3.1-1arter97~ubuntu24.04.1 500 500 https://apt.armbian.com noble/noble-utils arm64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status works as expected / OOB: root@orangepi5:~# modinfo zfs filename: /lib/modules/6.12.19-current-rockchip64/updates/dkms/zfs.ko version: 2.3.1-1arter97~ubuntu24.04.1 license: CDDL license: Dual BSD/GPL license: Dual MIT/GPL author: OpenZFS description: ZFS alias: zzstd alias: zcommon alias: zunicode alias: znvpair alias: zlua alias: icp alias: zavl alias: devname:zfs alias: char-major-10-249 srcversion: 2742833EE1C14D857611F06 depends: spl name: zfs vermagic: 6.12.19-current-rockchip64 SMP preempt mod_unload aarch64 https://paste.armbian.com/unumubupog

Partially if you are going to install it via armbian-config https://github.com/armbian/configng/commit/b49c9fd6710f42ef253659c86c57b1db55615a77 For example: i am running 6.13.5-edge-x86 and I don't have an option to install ZFS as there is no support for it. On another system, where kernel is lower (6.12.17): (Ubuntu userspace) Edit: let me also try to install it.

It seems that this forum/project, along with similar initiatives, faces challenges in effectively addressing bugs that naturally arise in open-source software. Unfortunately, last year, one such project was even shut down due to various and constant pressures, while many open-source developers quietly walk away. DietPi users are Armbian users, though most of them may not be aware of it. A more concerning issue is the way DietPi prevents its users from understanding where the actual value comes from. When users compliment their work - often based on our contributions - DietPi accepts the praise. However, when issues arise, the blame is deflected elsewhere, with responses like, "I contacted the author of the U-Boot patch," or "This is an Armbian bug," instead of acknowledging responsibility.

Reported working on: - Pine64 2GB https://github.com/armbian/distribution/issues/5#issuecomment-2721078142

By default we mount all containers (data and config) folders under /armbian which has rights of 1st normal user of the OS - most expected use case scenario. If you want more complex deployment, you need to create your own Docker run / compose and mount containers folder elsewhere or try to bind mount what you need - on the OS level. Armbian-config is designed for inexperienced Linux users that would likely use default setup scenario. We purpusefully don't allow too many config options which would be confusing or / and would require additional learning in the process of installation. If you want to do it more on your own, please check this article https://docs.linuxserver.io/images/docker-nextcloud/ This is the fundation behind armbian-config way.

Exactly. I am not aware of this problem but am sure this is not the only one. Allwinner support quality (and hw itself) is not on the level of mainstream hardware. Many of those devices are - "be happy that you can use them for something", fix problems on your own. We do a lot of fixing, we provide you tools for that, but our resources can't match mountain of problems that can be find in super cheap hardware ... that are leaving factories light speed and their solo mission is to be sold

Does it work on Armbian X86 and Armbian for Rpi?

Check if getty is running on ttyS2 and stop it: sudo systemctl stop getty@ttyS2