Tantalum Posted December 21, 2018 Share Posted December 21, 2018 Consumption test: (Wifi off. With Gigabit LAN connection) Idle: 2.30W 1-Core: 4.40W 2-Core: 6.70W 4-Core: 7.75W 6-Core: 8.85W 6-Core + IO : 9.50W Idle: Full+IO: 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NicoD Posted December 21, 2018 Share Posted December 21, 2018 You've got an undervoltage before it goes into the board. I wonder what your USB voltage is? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dogshome Posted December 21, 2018 Share Posted December 21, 2018 Regarding hard discs. Getting 300 mbs on Samsung 840 ssd via single usb 3 adaptor. Emmc is about twice as fast as a class A2 SD which is about 40mbs / 80 emmc. I'll get exact numbers as these are from memory! Boot from ssd is noticeably quicker than both, despite some info coming from the emmc initially. Boot time from seeing the first cursor to a compete desktop is about 2 or 3 seconds. I hope integration from web browsers to the gpu might happen, as that is the only thing stopping this sbc being a real desktop alternative. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dogshome Posted December 21, 2018 Share Posted December 21, 2018 6 minutes ago, NicoD said: You've got an undervoltage before it goes into the board. I wonder what your USB voltage is? 2A is causing volt drop from the psu. It'll likely still be 5.1v at the source end. Back in the day, Texas PLCs had a 5V psu. This had a remote sense which had to be connected to the CPU card. I don't recall the exact processor, but it was 5v logic levels and quite power hungry. Thin power cables caused all sorts of problems, even with the remote sense due to fast transient under voltage. 10w is dissipation is notably a lot for this smallish passive heatsink. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NicoD Posted December 21, 2018 Share Posted December 21, 2018 41 minutes ago, dogshome said: 2A is causing volt drop from the psu. It'll likely still be 5.1v at the source end. You say it yourself. 5.1V at the source, and only 4.92 that the board. That's a too big drop. Your cables have a too big resistance. I used cables rated at 4A that can't provide stable 2A at 5V. 90% of the sold USB type-C cables are just not ok above 2A. The USB type c port is better, but the cables stayed the same. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edupv Posted December 22, 2018 Share Posted December 22, 2018 13 hours ago, NicoD said: The 2 left USB3 ports or working over the same controller, so best to use one on the left, and one on the right. Then you can reach max speed on both together. Read/Write speeds depend a lot on file sizes. Small files = slower. 17-21MB/s seems very slow. Is it using a USB3 to SATA adapter? Test what speed the hdd`s is capable of with big files. Then compare with the results you get here. Thanks for your suggestion, but I have to use this enclosure that uses one USB port only. Although 17-21MB/sec (for large files) shown by rsync is quite slow, it is not unacceptable for me, I use it for my backup files only. First time copy took quite a long time, but my daily/weekly change data is not so much, so daily/weekly update to the backup takes only 1-2 minutes or even shorter. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tantalum Posted December 22, 2018 Share Posted December 22, 2018 14 hours ago, NicoD said: You've got an undervoltage before it goes into the board. I wonder what your USB voltage is? IDLE : VDD_5V : 5.05V VCC5V0_SYS : 5.03V FULL: VDD_5V : 4.85V VCC5V0_SYS : 4.80V Powered with a Meanwell GS25E-05, 16AWG wires (12.5mOhm/m). The VDD_5V goes through the AO3415A mosfet. According to the specs it has a 42mOhm Rds(on). That mean a loss of 0.02V@idle and 0.1V@load. I haven't measured the USB 5V voltage, but it's directly connected to VDD_5V over a RT9724GQW load switch I think (Rds(on): 100mOhm), 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edupv Posted December 23, 2018 Share Posted December 23, 2018 On 12/21/2018 at 11:32 AM, edupv said: For reference : btrfs raid 1 rsync writing speed I just want to report that the writing speed from cwrsync (windows 10) to the btrfs raid 1 on NanoPo-M4 is 17MB/sec. (rsync option --info=progress2, during copying shows 21MB/sec, and then 17MB/sec when finished). Note : My 2 harddisks are on the same USB port (one enclosure contains two 2.5" hdd), not sure if each hdd on separated USB port will give better performance or not. 17-21MB/sec is the speed shown by cwrsync. The dd command test results are as the following : root@nanopim4:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=/bigdata/test1.img bs=1G count=1 oflag=dsync 1+0 records in 1+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB, 1.0 GiB) copied, 30.4417 s, 35.3 MB/s root@nanopim4:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=/bigdata/test1.img bs=4G count=1 oflag=dsync 0+1 records in 0+1 records out 2147479552 bytes (2.1 GB, 2.0 GiB) copied, 33.0011 s, 65.1 MB/s root@nanopim4:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=/bigdata/test1.img bs=4G count=2 oflag=dsync dd: warning: partial read (2147479552 bytes); suggest iflag=fullblock 0+2 records in 0+2 records out 4294959104 bytes (4.3 GB, 4.0 GiB) copied, 56.6536 s, 75.8 MB/s root@nanopim4:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=/bigdata/test2.img bs=512 count=1000 oflag=dsync 1000+0 records in 1000+0 records out 512000 bytes (512 kB, 500 KiB) copied, 2.01652 s, 254 kB/s root@nanopim4:~# More tests : root@nanopim4:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=/bigdata/test1.img bs=2G count=2 oflag=dsync dd: warning: partial read (2147479552 bytes); suggest iflag=fullblock 0+2 records in 0+2 records out 4294959104 bytes (4.3 GB, 4.0 GiB) copied, 61.0895 s, 70.3 MB/s root@nanopim4:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=/bigdata/test1.img bs=2G count=1 oflag=dsync 0+1 records in 0+1 records out 2147479552 bytes (2.1 GB, 2.0 GiB) copied, 27.7552 s, 77.4 MB/s root@nanopim4:~# 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dragonlost Posted January 14, 2019 Share Posted January 14, 2019 I just acquired nanopi-m4. I'm shooting with the latest nightly version of ubuntu bionic. When I turn off the card I have 2 bugs. An image remains on the screen. The card warms up hugely without stopping. The heater becomes extremely hot after 1 to 2 minutes while the power supply remains connected. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seasalt Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 9 hours ago, dragonlost said: I'm shooting with the latest nightly version of ubuntu bionic. What happens if you run a stable (non nightly) version of Armbian Bionic? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TCB13 Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 So, did anyone notice issues with Apache + SSL? I'm using Armbian Stretch from here https://dl.armbian.com/nanopim4/Debian_stretch_default.7z and apparently when I enable SSL in Apache, large downloads just hang after a while. I can't reproduce this issue with plain HTTP. Example on `wget` (same behaviour on a browser): wget https://xyz---/test.bin --2019-01-13 18:22:22-- https://xyz---/test.bin Resolving xyz--- (xyz---)... 85.241.xxx.xxx Connecting to xyz--- (xyz---)|85.241.xxx.xxx|:443... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 1073741824 (1,0G) [application/octet-stream] Saving to: 'test.bin.2' test.bin.2 39%[==================> ] 403,66M 11,6MB/s eta 54s It was downloading fine until it reached 403,66M, after this point nothing else happened. On the server side I get this: ssl_engine_io.c(2135): [client 85.243.xxx.xxx:59904] OpenSSL: write 16413/16413 bytes to BIO#5588cd8c50 [mem: 5588a87c23] (BIO dump follows) core_filters.c(525): [client 85.243.xxx.xxx:59904] core_output_filter: flushing because of THRESHOLD_MAX_BUFFER core_filters.c(547): (70007)The timeout specified has expired: [client 85.243.xxx.xxx:59904] core_output_filter: writing data to the network ssl_engine_io.c(2144): [client 85.243.xxx.xxx:59904] OpenSSL: I/O error, 16413 bytes expected to write on BIO#5588cd8c50 [mem: 5588a87c23] (70007)The timeout specified has expired: [client 85.243.xxx.xxx:59904] AH01993: SSL output filter write failed. ssl_engine_io.c(2135): [client 95.239.xxx.xxx:9937] OpenSSL: write 45/45 bytes to BIO#55bd9e23e0 [mem: 55bd9ec213] (BIO dump follows) ssl_engine_io.c(2144): [client 95.239.xxx.xxx:9937] OpenSSL: I/O error, 5 bytes expected to read on BIO#55bd9e9d80 [mem: 55bd9ec213] Here is the configuration of the VHosts serving this requests: <VirtualHost *:443> ServerName xyz--- ServerAdmin tcb13--- DocumentRoot /test ErrorLog /test/error.log CustomLog /test/access.log combined SSLEngine on SSLCertificateFile /mnt/SU1/letsencrypt/config/live/xyz---/fullchain.pem SSLCertificateKeyFile /mnt/SU1/letsencrypt/config/live/xyz---/privkey.pem Header always set Strict-Transport-Security "max-age=15768000" LogLevel trace6 </VirtualHost> I'm sure this isn't a network related problem because: Only happens with SSL enabled, on non-ssl vhosts I can download without issues; Other protocols (FTP and SCP) work just fine to download the same test file; No issues while testing the network with iperf3. Some system info: lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Debian Description: Debian GNU/Linux 9.6 (stretch) Release: 9.6 Codename: stretch uname -a Linux testxyz 4.4.162-rk3399 #41 SMP Fri Oct 26 14:03:47 CEST 2018 aarch64 GNU/Linux apache2ctl -V | grep -i "Server version" Server version: Apache/2.4.25 (Debian) root@testxyz:~# dpkg -l |grep apache2 ii apache2 2.4.25-3+deb9u6 arm64 Apache HTTP Server ii apache2-bin 2.4.25-3+deb9u6 arm64 Apache HTTP Server (modules and other binary files) ii apache2-data 2.4.25-3+deb9u6 all Apache HTTP Server (common files) ii apache2-utils 2.4.25-3+deb9u6 arm64 Apache HTTP Server (utility programs for web servers) ii libapache2-mod-php7.3 7.3.0-2+0~20181217092659.24+stretch~1.gbp54e52f arm64 server-side, HTML-embedded scripting language (Apache 2 module) Thank you all. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TCB13 Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 Meanwhile the iotop command is also broken: iotop Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/sbin/iotop", line 17, in main() File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/iotop/ui.py", line 620, in main main_loop() File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/iotop/ui.py", line 610, in main_loop = lambda: run_iotop(options) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/iotop/ui.py", line 508, in run_iotop return curses.wrapper(run_iotop_window, options) File "/usr/lib/python3.5/curses/init.py", line 94, in wrapper return func(stdscr, *args, **kwds) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/iotop/ui.py", line 501, in run_iotop_window ui.run() File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/iotop/ui.py", line 155, in run self.process_list.duration) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/iotop/ui.py", line 434, in refresh_display lines = self.get_data() File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/iotop/ui.py", line 415, in get_data return list(map(format, processes)) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/iotop/ui.py", line 388, in format cmdline = p.get_cmdline() File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/iotop/data.py", line 292, in get_cmdline proc_status = parse_proc_pid_status(self.pid) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/iotop/data.py", line 196, in parse_proc_pid_status key, value = line.split(':\t', 1) ValueError: not enough values to unpack (expected 2, got 1) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikegleasonjr Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 Hey guys, just exploring the possibility of having kernel 4.20 at some point for the NanoPi m4. Since it has big/little improvements in it, it would be great for us! Thanks 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pavelectric Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 Hello, friends. Who experimented with GPIO on the M4? Interested in PWM and SPI. SPI I could not include in the official version of Ubuntu from the manufacturer of the board. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
schnitzel Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 Hello to everybody. I have a problem: everytime when i reboot the ip-adress increases. No other OS or System (Raspy, Tablet, Pc) does so. Has somebody an idea to fix this? Thank you 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Igor Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 27 minutes ago, schnitzel said: No other OS or System Most Armbian images do not have this problem as well. 27 minutes ago, schnitzel said: Has somebody an idea to fix this? It should be fixed, but our fix could also be broken - RK3399 has handull of small troubles which is why we actually don't provide end user support yet. When you are approaching with a problem, you always need to provide logs (armbianmonitor -u). 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TCB13 Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 15 hours ago, Igor said: RK3399 has handull of small troubles which is why we actually don't provide end user support yet. Hello, can you confirm that my Apache/OpenSSL I/O issue might be something you guy already know about? https://forum.armbian.com/topic/7511-nanopi-m4/?do=findComment&comment=69785 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Igor Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 Just now, TCB13 said: Hello, can you confirm that my Apache/OpenSSL I/O issue might be something you guy already know about? I didn't encounter them by myself, but I think somebody brought up troubles when copying large files via USB3 drives. Check older posts in this subforum. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TCB13 Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 34 minutes ago, Igor said: I didn't encounter them by myself, but I think somebody brought up troubles when copying large files via USB3 drives. Check older posts in this subforum. Thank you for the answer, however if you look closely at my apache config I was trying to get the file from the eMMC card (because I was afraid of those issues you are taking about). I only had the SSL certifications on external media. Also tried with the certificates on the eMMC, same issue. I don't think its an USB3 issue because if I get a 10GB file stored on a USB disk via SCP it works just fine. Another strange thing: if I wget the file on the device itself it works fine, it doesn't stop, so maybe a network issue and the OpenSSL errors aren't that important? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Igor Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 Just now, TCB13 said: Another strange thing: if I wget the file on the device itself it works fine, it doesn't stop, so maybe a network issue and the OpenSSL errors aren't that important? Problems are outside user space levels otherwise we would notice such problems on other boards, but we don't. Kernel is the king and the troublemaker 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TCB13 Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 1 hour ago, Igor said: Problems are outside user space levels otherwise we would notice such problems on other boards, but we don't. Kernel is the king and the troublemaker I did have the same issue with downloads using wget on the device itself. It was fixed by an update 2 days ago (cleaned log bellow) I've no idea about which package update fixed the issue locally. libsystemd0:arm64 (232-25+deb9u7) over (232-25+deb9u6) libnss-myhostname:arm64 (232-25+deb9u7) over (232-25+deb9u6) libpam-systemd:arm64 (232-25+deb9u7) over (232-25+deb9u6) systemd (232-25+deb9u7) over (232-25+deb9u6) udev (232-25+deb9u7) over (232-25+deb9u6) libudev1:arm64 (232-25+deb9u7) over (232-25+deb9u6) systemd-sysv (232-25+deb9u7) over (232-25+deb9u6) php7.3-zip (7.3.1-1+0~20190113101756.25+stretch~1.gbp15aaa9) over (7.3.0-2+0~20181217092659.24+stretch~1.gbp54e52f) php7.3-intl (7.3.1-1+0~20190113101756.25+stretch~1.gbp15aaa9) over (7.3.0-2+0~20181217092659.24+stretch~1.gbp54e52f) php7.3-readline (7.3.1-1+0~20190113101756.25+stretch~1.gbp15aaa9) over (7.3.0-2+0~20181217092659.24+stretch~1.gbp54e52f) php7.3-mysql (7.3.1-1+0~20190113101756.25+stretch~1.gbp15aaa9) over (7.3.0-2+0~20181217092659.24+stretch~1.gbp54e52f) php7.3-xml (7.3.1-1+0~20190113101756.25+stretch~1.gbp15aaa9) over (7.3.0-2+0~20181217092659.24+stretch~1.gbp54e52f) php7.3-opcache (7.3.1-1+0~20190113101756.25+stretch~1.gbp15aaa9) over (7.3.0-2+0~20181217092659.24+stretch~1.gbp54e52f) php7.3-curl (7.3.1-1+0~20190113101756.25+stretch~1.gbp15aaa9) over (7.3.0-2+0~20181217092659.24+stretch~1.gbp54e52f) php7.3-imap (7.3.1-1+0~20190113101756.25+stretch~1.gbp15aaa9) over (7.3.0-2+0~20181217092659.24+stretch~1.gbp54e52f) php7.3-json (7.3.1-1+0~20190113101756.25+stretch~1.gbp15aaa9) over (7.3.0-2+0~20181217092659.24+stretch~1.gbp54e52f) php7.3-mbstring (7.3.1-1+0~20190113101756.25+stretch~1.gbp15aaa9) over (7.3.0-2+0~20181217092659.24+stretch~1.gbp54e52f) php7.3-cli (7.3.1-1+0~20190113101756.25+stretch~1.gbp15aaa9) over (7.3.0-2+0~20181217092659.24+stretch~1.gbp54e52f) libapache2-mod-php7.3 (7.3.1-1+0~20190113101756.25+stretch~1.gbp15aaa9) over (7.3.0-2+0~20181217092659.24+stretch~1.gbp54e52f)] php7.3-common (7.3.1-1+0~20190113101756.25+stretch~1.gbp15aaa9) over (7.3.0-2+0~20181217092659.24+stretch~1.gbp54e52f) linux-dtb-rk3399 (5.70) over (5.65) update-initramfs: Deleting /boot/initrd.img-4.4.162-rk3399 Removing obsolete file uInitrd-4.4.162-rk3399 linux-image-rk3399 (5.70) over (5.65) linux-stretch-root-nanopim4 (5.70) over (5.65) linux-u-boot-nanopim4-default (5.70) over (5.65) php7.3 (7.3.1-1+0~20190113101756.25+stretch~1.gbp15aaa9) over (7.3.0-2+0~20181217092659.24+stretch~1.gbp54e52f) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TCB13 Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 (edited) On 1/17/2019 at 11:14 AM, Igor said: Problems are outside user space levels otherwise we would notice such problems on other boards, but we don't. Kernel is the king and the troublemaker @Igor just found out the source of my problems. It's the on-board network. I just added a cheap USB 3 to Ethernet adaptor and I'm able to download files without issues at all. Maybe there is some strange bug with the driver for the built in network? However I don't get why it only manifests itself on HTTPS, other protocols such as SSH work just fine. Thank you all. ---------------- Update: I manage to find out that this issues are caused by TCP offloading. Disabling it with `ethtool -K eth0 rx off tx off` fixed the issue, no more errors on downloads. Edited January 18, 2019 by TCB13 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
littlema Posted January 19, 2019 Share Posted January 19, 2019 On 1/18/2019 at 7:52 AM, TCB13 said: @Igor just found out the source of my problems. It's the on-board network. I just added a cheap USB 3 to Ethernet adaptor and I'm able to download files without issues at all. Maybe there is some strange bug with the driver for the built in network? However I don't get why it only manifests itself on HTTPS, other protocols such as SSH work just fine. Thank you all. ---------------- Update: I manage to find out that this issues are caused by TCP offloading. Disabling it with `ethtool -K eth0 rx off tx off` fixed the issue, no more errors on downloads. I have the same problem with you. When I download bittorrent file from web,the network crashed,and when I use usb network card,every work good. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TCB13 Posted January 19, 2019 Share Posted January 19, 2019 3 hours ago, littlema said: I have the same problem with you. When I download bittorrent file from web,the network crashed,and when I use usb network card,every work good. @littlema can you try ethtool -K eth0 rx off tx off with the built in network adaptor and see if it helps? Check my answer here to survive reboots https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/495378/23085 . 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
littlema Posted January 19, 2019 Share Posted January 19, 2019 9 minutes ago, TCB13 said: @littlema can you try ethtool -K eth0 rx off tx off with the built in network adaptor and see if it helps? Check my answer here to survive reboots https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/495378/23085 . I try it in kernel 4.4.167. Thank you for your help. I am very excited that it can work very well. But I also try it in the latest kernel 4.20,but get 'don't support the operation'. I don't know why. But I can have a good work in the 4.4.167. Thank you very much!!! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TCB13 Posted January 19, 2019 Share Posted January 19, 2019 4 minutes ago, littlema said: I try it in kernel 4.4.167. Thank you for your help. I am very excited that it can work very well. But I also try it in the latest kernel 4.20,but get 'don't support the operation'. I don't know why. But I can have a good work in the 4.4.167. Thank you very much!!! Great, where did you get 4.20 from? Is there a link for it? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
littlema Posted January 19, 2019 Share Posted January 19, 2019 26 minutes ago, TCB13 said: Great, where did you get 4.20 from? Is there a link for it? of course, bro ,just a little trick. https://dl.armbian.com/nanopim4/ there is the download dir. And It has many imgs. if you find the 4.20 can work. I would be grateful for that. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williamv Posted January 19, 2019 Share Posted January 19, 2019 (edited) linux newbe. just installed latest armbian from sd to mmc, configured wifi on my new nanoPi M4 2MB. Will do NodeJS dev and Docker. Thought NanoPi M4 board supports 4K HDMI desktop? But looks like 1920x1080 is highest possible resolution. With FriendlyArm Ubuntu 18.04 same result. Update; found looking at MickMake's NanoPI Neo4 review #251 NanoPi NEO4: Smallest RK3399 SBC. What is real? less /var/logs/Xorg.0.log xrandr --newmode "3840x2160"x0.0 297.00 3840 4016 4104 4400 2160 2168 2178 2250 +hsync +vsync xrandr --addmode HDMI-1 "3840x2160x0.0" xrandr –output HDMI-1 –mode "3840x2160x0.0" Edited January 31, 2019 by williamv found solution 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mio75 Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 Hi, I have been struggling with a strange problem causing my Domoticz app to crash ever 5-10 days. I have noted that my dmesg has a lot of these messages: [3672676.299218] bcmsdh_sdmmc: Failed to Write byte F1:@0x1001f=00, Err: -5 [3672676.301072] bcmsdh_sdmmc: Failed to Write byte F1:@0x1001f=00, Err: -5 [3672676.302952] bcmsdh_sdmmc: Failed to Write byte F1:@0x1001f=00, Err: -5 [3672676.303863] bcmsdh_sdmmc: Failed to Read byte F1:@0x1001f=ff, Err: -5 [3672676.305737] bcmsdh_sdmmc: Failed to Read byte F1:@0x1001f=ff, Err: -5 [3672676.307589] bcmsdh_sdmmc: Failed to Read byte F1:@0x1001f=ff, Err: -5 [3672676.310518] bcmsdh_sdmmc: Failed to Write byte F1:@0x1001f=00, Err: -5 [3672676.312353] bcmsdh_sdmmc: Failed to Write byte F1:@0x1001f=00, Err: -5 [3672676.314268] bcmsdh_sdmmc: Failed to Write byte F1:@0x1001f=00, Err: -5 [3672676.315088] bcmsdh_sdmmc: Failed to Read byte F1:@0x1001f=ff, Err: -5 [3672676.316924] bcmsdh_sdmmc: Failed to Read byte F1:@0x1001f=ff, Err: -5 [3672676.318833] bcmsdh_sdmmc: Failed to Read byte F1:@0x1001f=ff, Err: -5 [3672676.319786] bcmsdh_sdmmc: Failed to Write byte F1:@0x1001f=00, Err: -5 [3672676.321644] bcmsdh_sdmmc: Failed to Write byte F1:@0x1001f=00, Err: -5 [3672676.323486] bcmsdh_sdmmc: Failed to Write byte F1:@0x1001f=00, Err: -5 I'm booting from an SD card with ARMBIAN 5.65 stable Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS 4.4.162-rk3399 running off an USB3 SSD. I need help to where these errors originate from - I guess it's the SD, right? But is it a driver/kernel issue or a HW issue?? Many thanks! /M 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mio75 Posted January 31, 2019 Share Posted January 31, 2019 On 1/28/2019 at 11:26 AM, mio75 said: Hi, I have been struggling with a strange problem causing my Domoticz app to crash ever 5-10 days. I have noted that my dmesg has a lot of these messages: [3672676.299218] bcmsdh_sdmmc: Failed to Write byte F1:@0x1001f=00, Err: -5 [3672676.301072] bcmsdh_sdmmc: Failed to Write byte F1:@0x1001f=00, Err: -5 [3672676.302952] bcmsdh_sdmmc: Failed to Write byte F1:@0x1001f=00, Err: -5 [3672676.303863] bcmsdh_sdmmc: Failed to Read byte F1:@0x1001f=ff, Err: -5 [3672676.305737] bcmsdh_sdmmc: Failed to Read byte F1:@0x1001f=ff, Err: -5 [3672676.307589] bcmsdh_sdmmc: Failed to Read byte F1:@0x1001f=ff, Err: -5 [3672676.310518] bcmsdh_sdmmc: Failed to Write byte F1:@0x1001f=00, Err: -5 [3672676.312353] bcmsdh_sdmmc: Failed to Write byte F1:@0x1001f=00, Err: -5 [3672676.314268] bcmsdh_sdmmc: Failed to Write byte F1:@0x1001f=00, Err: -5 [3672676.315088] bcmsdh_sdmmc: Failed to Read byte F1:@0x1001f=ff, Err: -5 [3672676.316924] bcmsdh_sdmmc: Failed to Read byte F1:@0x1001f=ff, Err: -5 [3672676.318833] bcmsdh_sdmmc: Failed to Read byte F1:@0x1001f=ff, Err: -5 [3672676.319786] bcmsdh_sdmmc: Failed to Write byte F1:@0x1001f=00, Err: -5 [3672676.321644] bcmsdh_sdmmc: Failed to Write byte F1:@0x1001f=00, Err: -5 [3672676.323486] bcmsdh_sdmmc: Failed to Write byte F1:@0x1001f=00, Err: -5 I'm booting from an SD card with ARMBIAN 5.65 stable Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS 4.4.162-rk3399 running off an USB3 SSD. I need help to where these errors originate from - I guess it's the SD, right? But is it a driver/kernel issue or a HW issue?? Many thanks! /M I uploaded a "armbianmonitor -u" here: http://ix.io/1zCr Does anybody have an idea what could be wrong? Thanks! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.